Abstract
Background Many common disorders across the lifespan feature impaired working memory (WM). Reported benefits of aWM training program include improving inattention in daily life, but this has not been evaluated in a meta-analysis. This study aimed to evaluate whether one WM training method has benefits for inattention in daily life by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched Medline and PsycINFO, relevant journals and contacted authors for studies with an intervention and control group reporting post-training estimates of inattention in daily life. To reduce the influence of differentWM training methods on the findings, the review was restricted to trials evaluating the Cogmed method. A meta-analysis calculated the pooled standardised difference in means (SMD) between intervention and control groups. Results A total of 622 studies were identified and 12 studies with 13 group comparisons met inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed a significant training effect on inattention in daily life, SMD=-0.47, 95 CI -0.65, -0.29, p
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e0119522 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | PLoS ONE |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Research output
- 168 Citations
- 1 Comment / Debate
-
Correction: Benefits of a working memory training program for inattention in daily life: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PLoS ONE (2016) 10:3 (e0119522) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119522)
Spencer-Smith, M. & Klingberg, T., 1 Nov 2016, In: PLoS ONE. 11, 11, e0167373.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment / Debate › Other › peer-review
17 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver