Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Australasian Transport Research Forum 2016 Proceedings |
| Place of Publication | Canberra, Australia |
| Publisher | Australasian Transport Research Forum |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Event | Australasian Transport Research Forum 2016 - Melbourne, Australia Duration: 16 Nov 2016 → 18 Nov 2016 Conference number: 38th http://atrf.info/papers/2016/index.aspx |
Conference
| Conference | Australasian Transport Research Forum 2016 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | ATRF 2016 |
| Country | Australia |
| City | Melbourne |
| Period | 16/11/16 → 18/11/16 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- Public transport
- International tourism
- Performance measurement
- Queensland
Cite this
}
Benchmarking public transport for international tourists in Queensland cities. / De Gruyter, Christopher ; Currie, Graham; Reynolds, James; Peel, Victoria ; Yang, Yan.
Australasian Transport Research Forum 2016 Proceedings. Canberra, Australia : Australasian Transport Research Forum, 2016. p. 1-16.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Paper › Research › peer-review
TY - GEN
T1 - Benchmarking public transport for international tourists in Queensland cities
AU - De Gruyter, Christopher
AU - Currie, Graham
AU - Reynolds, James
AU - Peel, Victoria
AU - Yang, Yan
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - High quality public transport is key to supporting the development of international tourism in cities. However, there is little understanding of how public transport is perceived by international tourists. The aim of this research was to benchmark the quality of urban public transport for international tourists using case studies of major cities in Queensland, Australia, and to compare them to Melbourne, London, Paris and Singapore. The selected case study cities were Brisbane, Gold Coast, Sunshine Coast, Cairns and Townsville. A scorecard approach, developed in previous research, was used to assess each city based on 26 weighted criteria covering the areas of information access, fares and ticketing, service levels, and special tourist services. Results showed that the Gold Coast had the highest aggregate score (152.9 out of 200), followed by Brisbane (134.8), Cairns (103.1), Sunshine Coast (100.6) and Townsville (65.0). A comparison to previous research showed that the Gold Coast performs well against international cities such as London (151.9) and Paris (149.8). However, the results also highlight a number of key areas for improvement. While the Gold Coast performed well on fares and ticketing, it could do more to improve special tourist services. While Townsville could improve on information access, there is much room to improve public transport service levels in all Queensland cities. This is in part due to the relatively large spread of tourist attractions, thereby increasing the scale of the transport task for tourism purposes.The results of this research help to identify areas of good performance and gaps in how public transport meets the needs of international tourists in Queensland cities. Future research could refine the approach by incorporating user-based surveys of international tourists.
AB - High quality public transport is key to supporting the development of international tourism in cities. However, there is little understanding of how public transport is perceived by international tourists. The aim of this research was to benchmark the quality of urban public transport for international tourists using case studies of major cities in Queensland, Australia, and to compare them to Melbourne, London, Paris and Singapore. The selected case study cities were Brisbane, Gold Coast, Sunshine Coast, Cairns and Townsville. A scorecard approach, developed in previous research, was used to assess each city based on 26 weighted criteria covering the areas of information access, fares and ticketing, service levels, and special tourist services. Results showed that the Gold Coast had the highest aggregate score (152.9 out of 200), followed by Brisbane (134.8), Cairns (103.1), Sunshine Coast (100.6) and Townsville (65.0). A comparison to previous research showed that the Gold Coast performs well against international cities such as London (151.9) and Paris (149.8). However, the results also highlight a number of key areas for improvement. While the Gold Coast performed well on fares and ticketing, it could do more to improve special tourist services. While Townsville could improve on information access, there is much room to improve public transport service levels in all Queensland cities. This is in part due to the relatively large spread of tourist attractions, thereby increasing the scale of the transport task for tourism purposes.The results of this research help to identify areas of good performance and gaps in how public transport meets the needs of international tourists in Queensland cities. Future research could refine the approach by incorporating user-based surveys of international tourists.
KW - Public transport
KW - International tourism
KW - Performance measurement
KW - Queensland
UR - http://atrf.info/papers/2016/index.aspx
M3 - Conference Paper
SP - 1
EP - 16
BT - Australasian Transport Research Forum 2016 Proceedings
PB - Australasian Transport Research Forum
CY - Canberra, Australia
ER -