Behind the conciliation doors: Settling discrimination complaints in Victoria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The vast majority of discrimination complaints do not reach a substantive hearing. Most are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (ADR), or withdrawn or settled prior to hearing; however, there is little publicly available information on the outcomes the parties negotiate prior to hearing. This article presents a study of settling discrimination complaints in Victoria based on interviews conducted with participants in that process. It explores the reasons why parties decide to settle rather than litigate, and examines what outcome complainants initially seek and what they ultimately settle for. Since many of the findings are consistent with earlier empirical studies, the article concludes by canvassing recent reform options that would address persistent problems with anti-discrimination law and improve its effectiveness in addressing individual complaints and wider discrimination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)778-799
Number of pages22
JournalGriffith Law Review
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{fe861755a9d740959dcf76d3375b203e,
title = "Behind the conciliation doors: Settling discrimination complaints in Victoria",
abstract = "The vast majority of discrimination complaints do not reach a substantive hearing. Most are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (ADR), or withdrawn or settled prior to hearing; however, there is little publicly available information on the outcomes the parties negotiate prior to hearing. This article presents a study of settling discrimination complaints in Victoria based on interviews conducted with participants in that process. It explores the reasons why parties decide to settle rather than litigate, and examines what outcome complainants initially seek and what they ultimately settle for. Since many of the findings are consistent with earlier empirical studies, the article concludes by canvassing recent reform options that would address persistent problems with anti-discrimination law and improve its effectiveness in addressing individual complaints and wider discrimination.",
author = "Dominique Allen",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10854664.2009.10854664",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "778--799",
journal = "Griffith Law Review",
issn = "1038-3441",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Behind the conciliation doors : Settling discrimination complaints in Victoria. / Allen, Dominique.

In: Griffith Law Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.01.2009, p. 778-799.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behind the conciliation doors

T2 - Settling discrimination complaints in Victoria

AU - Allen, Dominique

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - The vast majority of discrimination complaints do not reach a substantive hearing. Most are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (ADR), or withdrawn or settled prior to hearing; however, there is little publicly available information on the outcomes the parties negotiate prior to hearing. This article presents a study of settling discrimination complaints in Victoria based on interviews conducted with participants in that process. It explores the reasons why parties decide to settle rather than litigate, and examines what outcome complainants initially seek and what they ultimately settle for. Since many of the findings are consistent with earlier empirical studies, the article concludes by canvassing recent reform options that would address persistent problems with anti-discrimination law and improve its effectiveness in addressing individual complaints and wider discrimination.

AB - The vast majority of discrimination complaints do not reach a substantive hearing. Most are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (ADR), or withdrawn or settled prior to hearing; however, there is little publicly available information on the outcomes the parties negotiate prior to hearing. This article presents a study of settling discrimination complaints in Victoria based on interviews conducted with participants in that process. It explores the reasons why parties decide to settle rather than litigate, and examines what outcome complainants initially seek and what they ultimately settle for. Since many of the findings are consistent with earlier empirical studies, the article concludes by canvassing recent reform options that would address persistent problems with anti-discrimination law and improve its effectiveness in addressing individual complaints and wider discrimination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951745906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10854664.2009.10854664

DO - 10.1080/10854664.2009.10854664

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 778

EP - 799

JO - Griffith Law Review

JF - Griffith Law Review

SN - 1038-3441

IS - 3

ER -