TY - JOUR
T1 - Behavioral and fMRI evidence of the differing cognitive load of domain-specific assessments
AU - Howard, Steven J
AU - Burianova, Hana
AU - Ehrich, John
AU - Kervin, Lisa
AU - Calleia, Alysha
AU - Barkus, Emma
AU - Carmody, John
AU - Humphry, Stephen
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Standards-referenced educational reform has
increased the prevalence of standardized testing; however,
whether these tests accurately measure students? competencies
has been questioned. This may be due to domain-specific
assessments placing a differing domain-general cognitive
load on test-takers. To investigate this possibility, functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to identify and
quantify the neural correlates of performance on current,
international standardized methods of spelling assessment.
Out-of-scanner testing was used to further examine differences
in assessment results. Results provide converging
evidence that: (a) the spelling assessments differed in the
cognitive load placed on test-takers; (b) performance
decreased with increasing cognitive load of the assessment;
and (c) brain regions associated with working memory were
more highly activated during performance of assessments
that were higher in cognitive load. These findings suggest
that assessment design should optimize the cognitive load
placed on test-takers, to ensure students? results are an accurate
reflection of their true levels of competency.
AB - Standards-referenced educational reform has
increased the prevalence of standardized testing; however,
whether these tests accurately measure students? competencies
has been questioned. This may be due to domain-specific
assessments placing a differing domain-general cognitive
load on test-takers. To investigate this possibility, functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to identify and
quantify the neural correlates of performance on current,
international standardized methods of spelling assessment.
Out-of-scanner testing was used to further examine differences
in assessment results. Results provide converging
evidence that: (a) the spelling assessments differed in the
cognitive load placed on test-takers; (b) performance
decreased with increasing cognitive load of the assessment;
and (c) brain regions associated with working memory were
more highly activated during performance of assessments
that were higher in cognitive load. These findings suggest
that assessment design should optimize the cognitive load
placed on test-takers, to ensure students? results are an accurate
reflection of their true levels of competency.
UR - http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0306452215002845/1-s2.0-S0306452215002845-main.pdf?_tid=f0646ed0-269a-11e5-9f4c-00000aacb361&acdnat=1436488440_9a2ff166a2e5cf6c
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84927614960
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.047
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.047
M3 - Article
SN - 0306-4522
VL - 297
SP - 38
EP - 46
JO - Neuroscience
JF - Neuroscience
ER -