TY - JOUR
T1 - Bayesian network models for environmental flow decision making in the Daly River, Northern Territory, Australia
AU - Chan, Terence
AU - Hart, Barry
AU - Kennard, Mark
AU - Pusey, Bradley
AU - Shenton, Will
AU - Douglas, Michael
AU - Valentine, Eric
AU - Patel, Sandeep
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - This paper reports the development and application of two Bayesian Network models to assist decision making on the environmental
flows required to maintain the ecological health of the Daly River (Northern Territory, Australia). Currently, the Daly River is
unregulated, with only a small volume of water extracted annually for agriculture. However, there is considerable pressure for further
agricultural development in the catchment, particularly with demand for extra water extraction during the dry season (Maya??November).
The abundances of two fish speciesa??barramundi (Lates calcarifer) and sooty grunter (Hephaestus fuliginosus)a??were chosen as the
ecological endpoints for the models, which linked dry season flows to key aspects of the biology of each species. Where available, data were used to define flowa??fish habitat relationships, but most of the relationships were defined by expert opinion because of a lack of quantified ecological knowledge.
AB - This paper reports the development and application of two Bayesian Network models to assist decision making on the environmental
flows required to maintain the ecological health of the Daly River (Northern Territory, Australia). Currently, the Daly River is
unregulated, with only a small volume of water extracted annually for agriculture. However, there is considerable pressure for further
agricultural development in the catchment, particularly with demand for extra water extraction during the dry season (Maya??November).
The abundances of two fish speciesa??barramundi (Lates calcarifer) and sooty grunter (Hephaestus fuliginosus)a??were chosen as the
ecological endpoints for the models, which linked dry season flows to key aspects of the biology of each species. Where available, data were used to define flowa??fish habitat relationships, but most of the relationships were defined by expert opinion because of a lack of quantified ecological knowledge.
UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.1456/pdf
U2 - 10.1002/rra.1456
DO - 10.1002/rra.1456
M3 - Article
SN - 1535-1459
VL - E
SP - 1
EP - 19
JO - River Research and Applications
JF - River Research and Applications
ER -