TY - JOUR
T1 - Barriers to restoration
T2 - Pollution alters nurse effects for an ecosystem engineer
AU - Cameron, Hayley
AU - Amor, Michael D.
AU - Bellgrove, Alecia
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank W. Cameron, M. Cameron, W. Amor, V. Skrzypczyk, A. Hauser, B. Weyers, S. Brown, Z. Naga, S. Matsuno, P. Druce and others for field and laboratory assistance. T. Matthews, D. Mills, T. Slezak and C. Magilton are thanked for providing field and laboratory equipment. G. Quinn provided excellent advice on design and analysis. They are grateful to L. Morris and two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments that greatly improved their manuscript. They warmly acknowledge the cooperation of Wannon Water for providing access to historical data and documentation. Ammonia samples were processed by the Deakin University Water Quality Laboratory. Access to study sites within the Bay of Islands Coastal Park was granted by The Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) and Parks Victoria under permit #10006032.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 British Ecological Society
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Nurse plants modify the environment beneath their canopies to create favourable habitats for propagule recruitment. Nurse plants are potentially valuable tools for ecological restoration—yet empirical tests, particularly in polluted environments, remain rare. The few studies that do exist find that nurse plants positively affect propagule recruitment in polluted environments. Yet most tests have focused on pollution-tolerant species in metal-contaminated environments. Biotic interactions are highly context dependent, however, such that extrapolations to other suites of species and pollutant types appear premature. We examined changes in intraspecific nurse effects across pollution regimes for a pollution-sensitive, macroalgal ecosystem engineer that is a target for intertidal restoration. In a manipulative field experiment, we out-planted propagules in the presence and absence of conspecific canopies at unpolluted control shores and shores that received a partly remediated (low-toxicity) sewage effluent. We then monitored the performance (survival and growth) of these propagules over time. Algal canopies facilitated the survival and early growth of propagules at control sites, but not at partially remediated sites where propagules performed poorly irrespective of canopy presence. Synthesis and applications. Using a pollution-sensitive, macroalgal ecosystem engineer, we show for the first time that nurse-plant effects can be contingent on pollution regime, and that exposure to pollution (even at low levels) can erode nurse effects. We caution that nurse plants are unlikely to be universal tools for ecological restoration, including systems where facilitative nurse effects naturally occur (in our case, macroalgal canopies on unpolluted rocky reefs). Management practitioners should carefully consider the disturbance (e.g. pollution) tolerance of target species, and test whether nurse effects are maintained under current disturbance regimes, before large-scale translocations are attempted.
AB - Nurse plants modify the environment beneath their canopies to create favourable habitats for propagule recruitment. Nurse plants are potentially valuable tools for ecological restoration—yet empirical tests, particularly in polluted environments, remain rare. The few studies that do exist find that nurse plants positively affect propagule recruitment in polluted environments. Yet most tests have focused on pollution-tolerant species in metal-contaminated environments. Biotic interactions are highly context dependent, however, such that extrapolations to other suites of species and pollutant types appear premature. We examined changes in intraspecific nurse effects across pollution regimes for a pollution-sensitive, macroalgal ecosystem engineer that is a target for intertidal restoration. In a manipulative field experiment, we out-planted propagules in the presence and absence of conspecific canopies at unpolluted control shores and shores that received a partly remediated (low-toxicity) sewage effluent. We then monitored the performance (survival and growth) of these propagules over time. Algal canopies facilitated the survival and early growth of propagules at control sites, but not at partially remediated sites where propagules performed poorly irrespective of canopy presence. Synthesis and applications. Using a pollution-sensitive, macroalgal ecosystem engineer, we show for the first time that nurse-plant effects can be contingent on pollution regime, and that exposure to pollution (even at low levels) can erode nurse effects. We caution that nurse plants are unlikely to be universal tools for ecological restoration, including systems where facilitative nurse effects naturally occur (in our case, macroalgal canopies on unpolluted rocky reefs). Management practitioners should carefully consider the disturbance (e.g. pollution) tolerance of target species, and test whether nurse effects are maintained under current disturbance regimes, before large-scale translocations are attempted.
KW - canopy–propagule interactions
KW - ecological restoration
KW - facilitation
KW - foundation species
KW - fucoid
KW - nurse-plant effects
KW - pollution
KW - Stress Gradient Hypothesis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115003419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.14010
DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.14010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85115003419
SN - 0021-8901
VL - 58
SP - 2783
EP - 2796
JO - Journal of Applied Ecology
JF - Journal of Applied Ecology
IS - 12
ER -