Barriers to conducting research

A survey of trainees in emergency medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Research underpins evidence-based practice, but there are significant barriers to conducting research relevant to each clinical discipline. Understanding these barriers could allow strategies to reduce their impact. The present study was undertaken to understand specific barriers to research for emergency medicine (EM) trainees. Methods: EM trainees attending research short courses were surveyed. Free-text responses were classified into themes and a list of pre-specified potential barriers was used for ranking purposes. Results: The responders (n=61/90; 67.8%) were young, mostly male with low confidence in leading a research project and limited previous research experience. There were 155 unique barriers identified from 55 respondents, which fitted into nine categories. The most frequently perceived barrier was time (29%), followed by skills (22.6%) and cultural factors (19.4%). Most trainees (n=54/56, 96.4%) believed that the barriers could be overcome. Strategies suggested included protection of time, mentoring and education, as well as top-down improved research culture. Conclusions: Barriers to research in EM are similar to other specialities and were perceived to be manageable. Reorganisation and refocus of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine training curriculum may be an option to foster an environment to promote research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-209
Number of pages6
JournalEMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Keywords

  • Barriers
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Research
  • Surveys and questionnaires
  • emergency medicine

Cite this

@article{7e3311545dea4e42873473c68bbfe5c0,
title = "Barriers to conducting research: A survey of trainees in emergency medicine",
abstract = "Objective: Research underpins evidence-based practice, but there are significant barriers to conducting research relevant to each clinical discipline. Understanding these barriers could allow strategies to reduce their impact. The present study was undertaken to understand specific barriers to research for emergency medicine (EM) trainees. Methods: EM trainees attending research short courses were surveyed. Free-text responses were classified into themes and a list of pre-specified potential barriers was used for ranking purposes. Results: The responders (n=61/90; 67.8{\%}) were young, mostly male with low confidence in leading a research project and limited previous research experience. There were 155 unique barriers identified from 55 respondents, which fitted into nine categories. The most frequently perceived barrier was time (29{\%}), followed by skills (22.6{\%}) and cultural factors (19.4{\%}). Most trainees (n=54/56, 96.4{\%}) believed that the barriers could be overcome. Strategies suggested included protection of time, mentoring and education, as well as top-down improved research culture. Conclusions: Barriers to research in EM are similar to other specialities and were perceived to be manageable. Reorganisation and refocus of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine training curriculum may be an option to foster an environment to promote research.",
keywords = "Barriers, Evidence-based medicine, Research, Surveys and questionnaires, emergency medicine",
author = "Alexander Olaussen and Jennings, {Paul A} and Gerard O'Reilly and Biswadev Mitra and Cameron, {Peter A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1742-6723.12734",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "204--209",
journal = "EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia",
issn = "1742-6731",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to conducting research

T2 - A survey of trainees in emergency medicine

AU - Olaussen, Alexander

AU - Jennings, Paul A

AU - O'Reilly, Gerard

AU - Mitra, Biswadev

AU - Cameron, Peter A.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Objective: Research underpins evidence-based practice, but there are significant barriers to conducting research relevant to each clinical discipline. Understanding these barriers could allow strategies to reduce their impact. The present study was undertaken to understand specific barriers to research for emergency medicine (EM) trainees. Methods: EM trainees attending research short courses were surveyed. Free-text responses were classified into themes and a list of pre-specified potential barriers was used for ranking purposes. Results: The responders (n=61/90; 67.8%) were young, mostly male with low confidence in leading a research project and limited previous research experience. There were 155 unique barriers identified from 55 respondents, which fitted into nine categories. The most frequently perceived barrier was time (29%), followed by skills (22.6%) and cultural factors (19.4%). Most trainees (n=54/56, 96.4%) believed that the barriers could be overcome. Strategies suggested included protection of time, mentoring and education, as well as top-down improved research culture. Conclusions: Barriers to research in EM are similar to other specialities and were perceived to be manageable. Reorganisation and refocus of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine training curriculum may be an option to foster an environment to promote research.

AB - Objective: Research underpins evidence-based practice, but there are significant barriers to conducting research relevant to each clinical discipline. Understanding these barriers could allow strategies to reduce their impact. The present study was undertaken to understand specific barriers to research for emergency medicine (EM) trainees. Methods: EM trainees attending research short courses were surveyed. Free-text responses were classified into themes and a list of pre-specified potential barriers was used for ranking purposes. Results: The responders (n=61/90; 67.8%) were young, mostly male with low confidence in leading a research project and limited previous research experience. There were 155 unique barriers identified from 55 respondents, which fitted into nine categories. The most frequently perceived barrier was time (29%), followed by skills (22.6%) and cultural factors (19.4%). Most trainees (n=54/56, 96.4%) believed that the barriers could be overcome. Strategies suggested included protection of time, mentoring and education, as well as top-down improved research culture. Conclusions: Barriers to research in EM are similar to other specialities and were perceived to be manageable. Reorganisation and refocus of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine training curriculum may be an option to foster an environment to promote research.

KW - Barriers

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Research

KW - Surveys and questionnaires

KW - emergency medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010510227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1742-6723.12734

DO - 10.1111/1742-6723.12734

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 204

EP - 209

JO - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

JF - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

SN - 1742-6731

IS - 2

ER -