TY - JOUR
T1 - Barriers and facilitators to implementing self-directed therapy activities in inpatient rehabilitation settings
AU - Brusco, Natasha K.
AU - Walpole, Brianna
AU - Kugler, Helen
AU - Tilley, Louise
AU - Thwaites, Claire
AU - Devlin, Alicia
AU - Dorward, Emma
AU - Dulfer, Fiona
AU - Lee, Annemarie L.
AU - Morris, Meg E.
AU - Taylor, Nicholas F.
AU - Dawes, Helen
AU - Whittaker, Sara L.
AU - Ekegren, Christina L.
N1 - Funding Information:
A $10,000 grant was received from the Institute's Allied Health Research Centre. The funding body has no role in the design, analysis, or dissemination of the results. Funding information
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Occupational Therapy Australia.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Background: Self-directed therapy activities are not currently part of routine care during inpatient rehabilitation. Understanding patient and clinician perspectives on self-directed therapy is key to increasing implementation. The aim of this study was to investigate barriers and facilitators to implementing a self-directed therapy programme (“My Therapy”) in adult inpatient rehabilitation settings. Methods: My Therapy was recommended by physiotherapists and occupational therapists and completed by rehabilitation inpatients independently, outside of supervised therapy sessions. Physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and patients were invited to complete an online questionnaire comprising open-ended questions on barriers and facilitators to prescribing and participating in My Therapy. A directed content analysis of free-text responses was undertaken, with data coded using categories of the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B model). Results: Eleven patients and 20 clinicians completed the questionnaire. Patient capability was reported to be facilitated by comprehensive education by clinicians, with mixed attitudes towards the format of the programme booklet. Clinician capability was facilitated by staff collaboration. One benefit was the better use of downtime between the supervised therapy sessions, but opportunities for patients to engage in self-directed therapy were compromised by the lack of space to complete the programme. Clinician opportunity was reported to be provided via organisational support but workload was a reported barrier. Patient motivation to engage in self-directed therapy was reported to be fostered by feeling empowered, engaged, and encouraged to participate. Clinician motivation was associated with belief in the value of the programme. Conclusion: Despite some barriers to rehabilitation patients independently practicing therapeutic exercises and activities outside of supervised sessions, both clinicians and patients agreed it should be considered as routine practice. To do this, patient time, ward space, and staff collaboration are required. Further research is needed to scale-up the implementation of the My Therapy programme and evaluate its effectiveness.
AB - Background: Self-directed therapy activities are not currently part of routine care during inpatient rehabilitation. Understanding patient and clinician perspectives on self-directed therapy is key to increasing implementation. The aim of this study was to investigate barriers and facilitators to implementing a self-directed therapy programme (“My Therapy”) in adult inpatient rehabilitation settings. Methods: My Therapy was recommended by physiotherapists and occupational therapists and completed by rehabilitation inpatients independently, outside of supervised therapy sessions. Physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and patients were invited to complete an online questionnaire comprising open-ended questions on barriers and facilitators to prescribing and participating in My Therapy. A directed content analysis of free-text responses was undertaken, with data coded using categories of the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B model). Results: Eleven patients and 20 clinicians completed the questionnaire. Patient capability was reported to be facilitated by comprehensive education by clinicians, with mixed attitudes towards the format of the programme booklet. Clinician capability was facilitated by staff collaboration. One benefit was the better use of downtime between the supervised therapy sessions, but opportunities for patients to engage in self-directed therapy were compromised by the lack of space to complete the programme. Clinician opportunity was reported to be provided via organisational support but workload was a reported barrier. Patient motivation to engage in self-directed therapy was reported to be fostered by feeling empowered, engaged, and encouraged to participate. Clinician motivation was associated with belief in the value of the programme. Conclusion: Despite some barriers to rehabilitation patients independently practicing therapeutic exercises and activities outside of supervised sessions, both clinicians and patients agreed it should be considered as routine practice. To do this, patient time, ward space, and staff collaboration are required. Further research is needed to scale-up the implementation of the My Therapy programme and evaluate its effectiveness.
KW - hospital
KW - implementation
KW - rehabilitation
KW - self-directed therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161701320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1440-1630.12891
DO - 10.1111/1440-1630.12891
M3 - Article
C2 - 37291993
AN - SCOPUS:85161701320
SN - 0045-0766
VL - 70
SP - 617
EP - 626
JO - Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
JF - Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
IS - 5
ER -