TY - JOUR
T1 - BARD
T2 - a structured technique for group elicitation of Bayesian networks to support analytic reasoning
AU - Nyberg, Erik P.
AU - Nicholson, Ann E.
AU - Korb, Kevin B.
AU - Wybrow, Michael
AU - Zukerman, Ingrid
AU - Mascaro, Steven
AU - Thakur, Shreshth
AU - Oshni Alvandi, Abraham
AU - Riley, Jeff
AU - Pearson, Ross
AU - Morris, Shane
AU - Herrmann, Matthieu
AU - Azad, A. K.M.
AU - Bolger, Fergus
AU - Hahn, Ulrike
AU - Lagnado, David
N1 - Funding Information:
This quest for automated explanation of BNs has become a major three‐year spinoff project, “Improving human reasoning with causal Bayes networks: a multimodal approach,” involving several BARD researchers at Monash University and the University of London, and funded by the Australian Research Council. See https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/NCGP/Web/Grant/Grant/DP200100040 .
Funding Information:
In this article, we contribute a detailed description and motivation for our new methodology and application, Bayesian ARgumentation via Delphi (BARD), which combines BNs with a Delphi social process: a systematic method for combining multiple perspectives in a democratic, reasoned, iterative manner (Linstone & Turoff, 1975 ). The initial motivation for BARD was to extend the use of BNs to a new domain: intelligence analysis. Development began as part of the Crowdsourcing Evidence, Argumentation, Thinking and Evaluation (CREATE) program funded by the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) 1
Funding Information:
Funding for the BARD project was provided by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), through their CREATE program under Contract 2017‐16122000003. 31
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - In many complex, real-world situations, problem solving and decision making require effective reasoning about causation and uncertainty. However, human reasoning in these cases is prone to confusion and error. Bayesian networks (BNs) are an artificial intelligence technology that models uncertain situations, supporting better probabilistic and causal reasoning and decision making. However, to date, BN methodologies and software require (but do not include) substantial upfront training, do not provide much guidance on either the model building process or on using the model for reasoning and reporting, and provide no support for building BNs collaboratively. Here, we contribute a detailed description and motivation for our new methodology and application, Bayesian ARgumentation via Delphi (BARD). BARD utilizes BNs and addresses these shortcomings by integrating (1) short, high-quality e-courses, tips, and help on demand; (2) a stepwise, iterative, and incremental BN construction process; (3) report templates and an automated explanation tool; and (4) a multiuser web-based software platform and Delphi-style social processes. The result is an end-to-end online platform, with associated online training, for groups without prior BN expertise to understand and analyze a problem, build a model of its underlying probabilistic causal structure, validate and reason with the causal model, and (optionally) use it to produce a written analytic report. Initial experiments demonstrate that, for suitable problems, BARD aids in reasoning and reporting. Comparing their effect sizes also suggests BARD's BN-building and collaboration combine beneficially and cumulatively.
AB - In many complex, real-world situations, problem solving and decision making require effective reasoning about causation and uncertainty. However, human reasoning in these cases is prone to confusion and error. Bayesian networks (BNs) are an artificial intelligence technology that models uncertain situations, supporting better probabilistic and causal reasoning and decision making. However, to date, BN methodologies and software require (but do not include) substantial upfront training, do not provide much guidance on either the model building process or on using the model for reasoning and reporting, and provide no support for building BNs collaboratively. Here, we contribute a detailed description and motivation for our new methodology and application, Bayesian ARgumentation via Delphi (BARD). BARD utilizes BNs and addresses these shortcomings by integrating (1) short, high-quality e-courses, tips, and help on demand; (2) a stepwise, iterative, and incremental BN construction process; (3) report templates and an automated explanation tool; and (4) a multiuser web-based software platform and Delphi-style social processes. The result is an end-to-end online platform, with associated online training, for groups without prior BN expertise to understand and analyze a problem, build a model of its underlying probabilistic causal structure, validate and reason with the causal model, and (optionally) use it to produce a written analytic report. Initial experiments demonstrate that, for suitable problems, BARD aids in reasoning and reporting. Comparing their effect sizes also suggests BARD's BN-building and collaboration combine beneficially and cumulatively.
KW - Delphi process
KW - probabilistic graphical models
KW - probabilistic reasoning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108331183&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/risa.13759
DO - 10.1111/risa.13759
M3 - Article
C2 - 34146433
AN - SCOPUS:85108331183
VL - 42
SP - 1155
EP - 1178
JO - Risk Analysis
JF - Risk Analysis
SN - 0272-4332
IS - 6
ER -