Avoiding theoretical stagnation

a systematic review and framework for measuring public value

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public value theory has become a hot topic in public administration research, but its proponents have long recognised difficulties in empirically testing the theory's central propositions. There has been a lack of clarity about how to measure the extent to which organisations are generating public value, which has rendered researchers unable to quantitatively study the causes, consequences and correlates of public value. The current study systematically reviews the growing literature on public value measurement to identify, evaluate, and synthesise available measures. Through a qualitative synthesis of the themes present in published measures, we identify four key components for measuring public value that appear to be important across a range of policy and national contexts. Our review identifies a promising framework that could be used to structure a comprehensive measure of public value and, in doing so, provides a means to progress theoretical development and testing of the public value approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-86
Number of pages18
JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
Volume77
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Public value
  • Measurement
  • Systematic Review
  • Performance measurement

Cite this

@article{f64030a008bc4c4b83674ed57688afe6,
title = "Avoiding theoretical stagnation: a systematic review and framework for measuring public value",
abstract = "Public value theory has become a hot topic in public administration research, but its proponents have long recognised difficulties in empirically testing the theory's central propositions. There has been a lack of clarity about how to measure the extent to which organisations are generating public value, which has rendered researchers unable to quantitatively study the causes, consequences and correlates of public value. The current study systematically reviews the growing literature on public value measurement to identify, evaluate, and synthesise available measures. Through a qualitative synthesis of the themes present in published measures, we identify four key components for measuring public value that appear to be important across a range of policy and national contexts. Our review identifies a promising framework that could be used to structure a comprehensive measure of public value and, in doing so, provides a means to progress theoretical development and testing of the public value approach.",
keywords = "Public value, Measurement, Systematic Review, Performance measurement",
author = "Nicholas Faulkner and Stefan Kaufman",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8500.12251",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "69--86",
journal = "Australian Journal of Public Administration",
issn = "0313-6647",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Avoiding theoretical stagnation : a systematic review and framework for measuring public value. / Faulkner, Nicholas; Kaufman, Stefan.

In: Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2018, p. 69-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Avoiding theoretical stagnation

T2 - a systematic review and framework for measuring public value

AU - Faulkner, Nicholas

AU - Kaufman, Stefan

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Public value theory has become a hot topic in public administration research, but its proponents have long recognised difficulties in empirically testing the theory's central propositions. There has been a lack of clarity about how to measure the extent to which organisations are generating public value, which has rendered researchers unable to quantitatively study the causes, consequences and correlates of public value. The current study systematically reviews the growing literature on public value measurement to identify, evaluate, and synthesise available measures. Through a qualitative synthesis of the themes present in published measures, we identify four key components for measuring public value that appear to be important across a range of policy and national contexts. Our review identifies a promising framework that could be used to structure a comprehensive measure of public value and, in doing so, provides a means to progress theoretical development and testing of the public value approach.

AB - Public value theory has become a hot topic in public administration research, but its proponents have long recognised difficulties in empirically testing the theory's central propositions. There has been a lack of clarity about how to measure the extent to which organisations are generating public value, which has rendered researchers unable to quantitatively study the causes, consequences and correlates of public value. The current study systematically reviews the growing literature on public value measurement to identify, evaluate, and synthesise available measures. Through a qualitative synthesis of the themes present in published measures, we identify four key components for measuring public value that appear to be important across a range of policy and national contexts. Our review identifies a promising framework that could be used to structure a comprehensive measure of public value and, in doing so, provides a means to progress theoretical development and testing of the public value approach.

KW - Public value

KW - Measurement

KW - Systematic Review

KW - Performance measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019390974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8500.12251

DO - 10.1111/1467-8500.12251

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 69

EP - 86

JO - Australian Journal of Public Administration

JF - Australian Journal of Public Administration

SN - 0313-6647

IS - 1

ER -