Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Avelumab Combined with Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: The Phase 2 ICE-PAC Clinical Trial

  • Edmond M. Kwan
  • , Lavinia Spain
  • , Angelyn Anton
  • , Chun L. Gan
  • , Linda Garrett
  • , Deborah Chang
  • , Elizabeth Liow
  • , Caitlin Bennett
  • , Tiantian Zheng
  • , Jianjun Yu
  • , Chao Dai
  • , Pan Du
  • , Shidong Jia
  • , Heidi Fettke
  • , Claire Abou-Seif
  • , Gargi Kothari
  • , Mark Shaw
  • , Phillip Parente
  • , Carmel Pezaro
  • , Ben Tran
  • Shankar Siva, Arun A. Azad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has produced modest results. High-dose radiotherapy may be synergistic with checkpoint inhibitors. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in mCRPC. Design, setting, and participants: From November 2017 to July 2019, this prospective phase 2 study enrolled 31 men with progressive mCRPC after at least one prior androgen receptor–directed therapy. Median follow-up was 18.0 mo. Intervention: Avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 wk for 24 wk (12 cycles). A single fraction of SABR (20 Gy) was administered to one or two disease sites within 5 d before the first and second avelumab treatments. Outcomes measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), defined as a confirmed complete or partial response of any duration, or stable disease/non–complete response/non–progressive disease for ≥6 mo (Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3–modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1). Secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. DCR and ORR were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson exact binomial method. Results and limitations: Thirty-one evaluable men were enrolled (median age 71 yr, 71% with ≥2 prior mCRPC therapy lines, 81% with >5 total metastases). The DCR was 48% (15/31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 30–67%) and ORR was 31% (five of 16; 95% CI 11–59%). The ORR in nonirradiated lesions was 33% (four of 12; 95% CI 10–65%). Median rPFS was 8.4 mo (95% CI 4.5–not reached [NR]) and median OS was 14.1 mo (95% CI 8.9–NR). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in six patients (16%), with three (10%) requiring high-dose corticosteroid therapy. Plasma androgen receptor alterations were associated with lower DCR (22% vs 71%, p = 0.13; Fisher's exact test). Limitations include the small sample size and the absence of a control arm. Conclusions: Avelumab with SABR demonstrated encouraging activity and acceptable toxicity in treatment-refractory mCRPC. This combination warrants further investigation. Patient summary: In this study of men with advanced and heavily pretreated prostate cancer, combining stereotactic radiotherapy with avelumab immunotherapy was safe and resulted in nearly half of patients experiencing cancer control for 6 months or longer. Stereotactic radiotherapy may potentially improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy in prostate cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-262
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume81
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Castration-resistant
  • Checkpoint inhibitor
  • Immunotherapy
  • Metastasis-directed therapy
  • Prostate cancer
  • Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy
  • Stereotactic body radiation therapy

Cite this