Abstract
John Christman has recently objected to substantive conceptions of autonomy on the grounds that they introduce unwanted perfectionism into political thinking. I defend substantive conceptions of autonomy against Christman's critique on two fronts. First, I defend substantive conceptions of autonomy against the charge that their utilisation in political theory would result in the inappropriate exclusion from democratic respect of individuals in oppressive relations. Second, I defend substantive conceptions of autonomy from the charge that they fail the 'endorsement constraint', i.e. that incorporating a substantive conception of autonomy into the concept of the person at the heart of a political theory would be alienating for citizens.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 353-369 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Res Publica |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Autonomy
- Christman
- Liberalism
- Perfectionism