TY - JOUR
T1 - Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of cartilage lesions of the knee: A systematic review of randomized studies
AU - Vasiliadis, Haris
AU - Wasiak, Jason
AU - Salanti, Georgia
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI)
techniques are becoming more popular for the treatment of
full thickness cartilage lesions of the knee joint. However,
there is no systematic information for the efficacy of the new
generation ACI techniques compared to other treatment
options. A systematic review of the existing evidence from
randomized clinical trials of ACI treatment would contribute
to understanding the advantages and limitations of this
method and would inform the planning of future studies.
Using pre-defined criteria, we searched a number of electronic
databases to identify all the existing randomized
control trials of any type of ACI treatment. Risk of bias was
assessed and an analysis of the reported outcomes was
performed. Information on the clinical efficacy and safety of
ACI compared to other interventions was collected and
presented. Nine trials were identified with 626 patients.
Patients ranged from 15 to 52 years, and the size of treated
lesions was between 1 and 22 cm2. ACI was associated with
improvement in clinical outcomes compared to baseline.
However, the body of evidence did not suggest any superiority
of ACI over other treatments. Complication rates were
comparable between interventions except from an increased
rate of graft hypertrophies after ACI with periosteum. ACI is
an effective treatment for full thickness chondral defects of
the knee, providing an improvement of clinical outcomes.
However, there is insufficient data to say whether ACI is
superior to other treatment strategies. More high quality
studies and harmonization in the reported outcomes are
needed before specific suggestions for practice can be made.
AB - Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI)
techniques are becoming more popular for the treatment of
full thickness cartilage lesions of the knee joint. However,
there is no systematic information for the efficacy of the new
generation ACI techniques compared to other treatment
options. A systematic review of the existing evidence from
randomized clinical trials of ACI treatment would contribute
to understanding the advantages and limitations of this
method and would inform the planning of future studies.
Using pre-defined criteria, we searched a number of electronic
databases to identify all the existing randomized
control trials of any type of ACI treatment. Risk of bias was
assessed and an analysis of the reported outcomes was
performed. Information on the clinical efficacy and safety of
ACI compared to other interventions was collected and
presented. Nine trials were identified with 626 patients.
Patients ranged from 15 to 52 years, and the size of treated
lesions was between 1 and 22 cm2. ACI was associated with
improvement in clinical outcomes compared to baseline.
However, the body of evidence did not suggest any superiority
of ACI over other treatments. Complication rates were
comparable between interventions except from an increased
rate of graft hypertrophies after ACI with periosteum. ACI is
an effective treatment for full thickness chondral defects of
the knee, providing an improvement of clinical outcomes.
However, there is insufficient data to say whether ACI is
superior to other treatment strategies. More high quality
studies and harmonization in the reported outcomes are
needed before specific suggestions for practice can be made.
U2 - 10.1007/s00167-010-1050-3
DO - 10.1007/s00167-010-1050-3
M3 - Article
SN - 0942-2056
VL - 18
SP - 1645
EP - 1655
JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
IS - 12
ER -