Australian military primary care practitioners do not believe clinical practice guidelines are needed for postdeployment medically unexplained symptoms

Jon Adams, Alison Mackenzie, Ruth McLaughlin, Nicholas Burke, Sonya Bennett, Robyn Mobbs, Niki Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In Australia, little research has been undertaken on the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to assist with the impact of postdeployment ill-health including medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) and it has been unclear-whether such a development is desired by Australian primary care practitioners. In response an empirical investigation into the perceptions and experiences of 24 medical officers from the Australian military with regard to postdeployment ill-health, medically unexplained symptoms, and the potential development of CPGs in this area was undertaken. The analysis suggests that although MUS are accepted as common in general practice they are not perceived by practitioners to be as prevalent in the Australian Defense Forces. Although the medical officers do not perceive clinical practice guidelines as the best tool for managing MUS, there was interest in the development of practical tools to assist in the diagnosis of medically unexplained symptoms. The response by practitioners is of critical importance for the potential implementation of clinical practice guidelines in this area. Reprint &

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)392-397
Number of pages6
JournalMilitary Medicine
Volume174
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Cite this