Australian clinical practice guideline for physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adult intensive care units

Carol L. Hodgson (Leading Author), Tessa Broadley (Leading Author), Michelle Paton, Alisa M. Higgins, Shannah Anderson, Sue Brennan, Catherine L. Granger, Naomi E. Hammond, Sherene Magana Cruz, Jenna K. Lang, I. Anne Leditschke, Neil R. Orford, Selina M. Parry, Bronwyn Price, Pam Taylor, Andrew A. Udy, Sally E. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The evidence base for research on physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in the intensive care unit has led to uncertainty about best practice. Objective: The objective of this guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinical decision-making for physical rehabilitation management of adults undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in Australian intensive care units. Methods: The guideline development group, comprising national representation of clinical experts, methodologists, and consumers, followed a rigorous process, adhering to Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for Guidelines, to create the recommendations. The guideline development group determined the scope of the guideline and defined the key clinical question. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate all available evidence based on the predefined outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using a restricted maximum likelihood approach, and results were summarised in an evidence profile. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence, and the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework was used to formulate recommendations. Summary of recommendations: Based on the evidence profile and GRADE Evidence to Decision framework, the group developed three conditional recommendations and 14 Good Clinical Practice statements to guide practice. The guideline provides conditional recommendations in favour of undertaking physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit whilst acknowledging the uncertainty of evidence. It was endorsed by four key professional organisations. Conclusion: The recommendations within this guideline were developed following best methodological practice. Despite the overall low certainty of evidence, the resulting guideline provides support to clinical decision-making, facilitates the translation of research into practice, and enhances the reach and impact of clinical research. Additionally, the guideline development group identified evidence gaps that could be addressed by future research. Trial registration: Not applicable.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101235
Number of pages8
JournalAustralian Critical Care
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Clinical practice guideline
  • Evidence based practice
  • GRADE
  • ICU
  • Mobilisation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this