Audit of referral pathways in the diagnosis of lung cancer: a pilot study

Geraldine Largey, Samantha Paubrey Chakraborty, Tracey Tobias, Peter Briggs, Danielle Mazza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This pilot study sought to describe the diagnostic pathways for patients with lung cancer and explore the feasibility of a medical record audit for this purpose. An audit of 25 medical records of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer was conducted, at a single outer metropolitan hospital in Victoria. Patients were presented to secondary care from general practice (n = 17, 68 ), the emergency department (n = 3, 12 ) or specialist rooms (n = 1, 4 ). Those who journeyed through general practice experienced the longest median intervals to diagnosis (20 days, interquartile range 747). The majority of patients (n = 15, 60 ) were referred by a specialist to a multidisciplinary team after a diagnosis had been confirmed but before treatment commenced. These patients waited a median of 20 days from their first specialist appointment to a multidisciplinary team appointment. This research illustrated that a variety of pathways to diagnosis exist. Critically, it requires patient data and additional auditing of primary, public and private health sector records to determine generalisability of findings and the effectiveness of a medical record audit as a data collection tool.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106 - 110
Number of pages5
JournalAustralian Journal of Primary Health
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this