Audit market concentration, audit fees, and audit quality: evidence from China

Ting-Chiao Huang, Hsihui Chang, Jeng-Ren Chiou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)


We investigate the effects of audit market concentration on audit fees and audit quality in China, where competition is intense and the legal environment is relatively weak compared with developed countries. Analyzing 12,334 firm-year observations for the period 2001 to 2011, we find a significant positive relation between concentration and audit fees. Path analysis shows that concentration improves client earnings quality and reduces the need for auditors to issue modified audit opinions through increased audit fees. Additional analysis indicates that the increased audit fees and client earnings quality resulting from increased concentration are associated with a lower likelihood of executives and auditors being sanctioned by regulators for audit failures. Together, our results suggest that concentration improves audit quality indirectly through increased audit fees and this positive indirect effect offsets the negative direct effect of concentration on audit quality. By separating the direct and the indirect effect of concentration on audit quality, our study would explain why previous studies that do not have a separation document mixed evidence. Our findings inform regulators that actions taken to eliminate the indirect effect of concentration, for example restricting the upper bound of audit fees, could produce unintended outcomes such as decreased audit quality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-145
Number of pages25
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - May 2016


  • Audit fees
  • Audit market concentration
  • Audit quality
  • China

Cite this