Attracting junior doctors to rural centres

A national study of work-life conditions and satisfaction

Matthew Lennon, Belinda O’Sullivan, Matthew McGrail, Deborah Russell, Joseph Suttie, John Preddy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Junior doctors, in their first four years of medical work, are an important part of the health care team. Attracting and retaining these doctors to rural areas underpins the development of the future rural workforce. This is the first national-scale study about satisfaction of junior doctors, based on their work location, to inform recruitment and retention. Design: Repeat cross-sectional data 2008 and 2015, pooled for analysis. Setting: Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life survey. Participants: First responses of 4581 pre-vocational doctors working as interns up to their fourth postgraduate year. Main outcome measures: Differences between metropolitan and rural respondents in satisfaction and positivity on two inventories. Results: Overall work satisfaction was approximately 85% amongst rural and metropolitan junior doctors, but controlling for other factors rural junior doctors had significantly higher overall satisfaction. Rural junior doctors were significantly more satisfied with their work-life balance, ability to obtain desired leave and leave at short notice, personal study time and access to leisure interests compared with metropolitan junior doctors. Metropolitan junior doctors were more satisfied with the network of doctors supporting them and the opportunities for family. Conclusion: While both metropolitan and rural junior doctors are generally satisfied, many professional and personal aspects of satisfaction differ considerably by work location. In order to attract early career doctors, the benefits of rural work should be emphasised and perceived weaknesses mitigated.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Journal of Rural Health
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 17 Oct 2019

Keywords

  • health policy
  • health service development
  • recruitment and retention
  • rural workforce development
  • surveys

Cite this

@article{416e121b00f44f5c9e12cc9c142180cb,
title = "Attracting junior doctors to rural centres: A national study of work-life conditions and satisfaction",
abstract = "Objective: Junior doctors, in their first four years of medical work, are an important part of the health care team. Attracting and retaining these doctors to rural areas underpins the development of the future rural workforce. This is the first national-scale study about satisfaction of junior doctors, based on their work location, to inform recruitment and retention. Design: Repeat cross-sectional data 2008 and 2015, pooled for analysis. Setting: Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life survey. Participants: First responses of 4581 pre-vocational doctors working as interns up to their fourth postgraduate year. Main outcome measures: Differences between metropolitan and rural respondents in satisfaction and positivity on two inventories. Results: Overall work satisfaction was approximately 85{\%} amongst rural and metropolitan junior doctors, but controlling for other factors rural junior doctors had significantly higher overall satisfaction. Rural junior doctors were significantly more satisfied with their work-life balance, ability to obtain desired leave and leave at short notice, personal study time and access to leisure interests compared with metropolitan junior doctors. Metropolitan junior doctors were more satisfied with the network of doctors supporting them and the opportunities for family. Conclusion: While both metropolitan and rural junior doctors are generally satisfied, many professional and personal aspects of satisfaction differ considerably by work location. In order to attract early career doctors, the benefits of rural work should be emphasised and perceived weaknesses mitigated.",
keywords = "health policy, health service development, recruitment and retention, rural workforce development, surveys",
author = "Matthew Lennon and Belinda O’Sullivan and Matthew McGrail and Deborah Russell and Joseph Suttie and John Preddy",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1111/ajr.12577",
language = "English",
journal = "Australian Journal of Rural Health",
issn = "1038-5282",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Attracting junior doctors to rural centres : A national study of work-life conditions and satisfaction. / Lennon, Matthew; O’Sullivan, Belinda; McGrail, Matthew; Russell, Deborah; Suttie, Joseph; Preddy, John.

In: Australian Journal of Rural Health, 17.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attracting junior doctors to rural centres

T2 - A national study of work-life conditions and satisfaction

AU - Lennon, Matthew

AU - O’Sullivan, Belinda

AU - McGrail, Matthew

AU - Russell, Deborah

AU - Suttie, Joseph

AU - Preddy, John

PY - 2019/10/17

Y1 - 2019/10/17

N2 - Objective: Junior doctors, in their first four years of medical work, are an important part of the health care team. Attracting and retaining these doctors to rural areas underpins the development of the future rural workforce. This is the first national-scale study about satisfaction of junior doctors, based on their work location, to inform recruitment and retention. Design: Repeat cross-sectional data 2008 and 2015, pooled for analysis. Setting: Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life survey. Participants: First responses of 4581 pre-vocational doctors working as interns up to their fourth postgraduate year. Main outcome measures: Differences between metropolitan and rural respondents in satisfaction and positivity on two inventories. Results: Overall work satisfaction was approximately 85% amongst rural and metropolitan junior doctors, but controlling for other factors rural junior doctors had significantly higher overall satisfaction. Rural junior doctors were significantly more satisfied with their work-life balance, ability to obtain desired leave and leave at short notice, personal study time and access to leisure interests compared with metropolitan junior doctors. Metropolitan junior doctors were more satisfied with the network of doctors supporting them and the opportunities for family. Conclusion: While both metropolitan and rural junior doctors are generally satisfied, many professional and personal aspects of satisfaction differ considerably by work location. In order to attract early career doctors, the benefits of rural work should be emphasised and perceived weaknesses mitigated.

AB - Objective: Junior doctors, in their first four years of medical work, are an important part of the health care team. Attracting and retaining these doctors to rural areas underpins the development of the future rural workforce. This is the first national-scale study about satisfaction of junior doctors, based on their work location, to inform recruitment and retention. Design: Repeat cross-sectional data 2008 and 2015, pooled for analysis. Setting: Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life survey. Participants: First responses of 4581 pre-vocational doctors working as interns up to their fourth postgraduate year. Main outcome measures: Differences between metropolitan and rural respondents in satisfaction and positivity on two inventories. Results: Overall work satisfaction was approximately 85% amongst rural and metropolitan junior doctors, but controlling for other factors rural junior doctors had significantly higher overall satisfaction. Rural junior doctors were significantly more satisfied with their work-life balance, ability to obtain desired leave and leave at short notice, personal study time and access to leisure interests compared with metropolitan junior doctors. Metropolitan junior doctors were more satisfied with the network of doctors supporting them and the opportunities for family. Conclusion: While both metropolitan and rural junior doctors are generally satisfied, many professional and personal aspects of satisfaction differ considerably by work location. In order to attract early career doctors, the benefits of rural work should be emphasised and perceived weaknesses mitigated.

KW - health policy

KW - health service development

KW - recruitment and retention

KW - rural workforce development

KW - surveys

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074330182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajr.12577

DO - 10.1111/ajr.12577

M3 - Article

JO - Australian Journal of Rural Health

JF - Australian Journal of Rural Health

SN - 1038-5282

ER -