Attenuated self-tickle sensation even under trajectory perturbation

George Haborym Van Doorn, Bryan Paton, Jacqui Lee Howell, Jakob Hohwy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The efference copy account of the tickle effect (i.e., our inability to tickle ourselves) predicts no tickle effect (i.e., an ability to tickle ourselves) when the trajectory of a tactile stimulus is perturbed relative to the associated movement, and there is evidence in support of this. The active inference account, however, predicts the tickle effect should survive trajectory perturbation. We test these accounts of the tickle effect under the hypothesis that previous findings are due to attentional modulation, and that the tickle effect will be found in a paradigm with no conscious attention directed to the trajectory perturbation. We thus expected to find support for active inference. Our first experiment confirms this hypothesis, while our second seeks to explain previous findings in terms of the modulation of the tickle sensation when there is awareness of, and different degrees of attention to, the spatial tactile and kinesthetic trajectories. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147 - 153
Number of pages7
JournalConsciousness and Cognition
Volume36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

Van Doorn, George Haborym ; Paton, Bryan ; Howell, Jacqui Lee ; Hohwy, Jakob. / Attenuated self-tickle sensation even under trajectory perturbation. In: Consciousness and Cognition. 2015 ; Vol. 36. pp. 147 - 153.
@article{af2b4ebb848e4b77a201d68d86e71008,
title = "Attenuated self-tickle sensation even under trajectory perturbation",
abstract = "The efference copy account of the tickle effect (i.e., our inability to tickle ourselves) predicts no tickle effect (i.e., an ability to tickle ourselves) when the trajectory of a tactile stimulus is perturbed relative to the associated movement, and there is evidence in support of this. The active inference account, however, predicts the tickle effect should survive trajectory perturbation. We test these accounts of the tickle effect under the hypothesis that previous findings are due to attentional modulation, and that the tickle effect will be found in a paradigm with no conscious attention directed to the trajectory perturbation. We thus expected to find support for active inference. Our first experiment confirms this hypothesis, while our second seeks to explain previous findings in terms of the modulation of the tickle sensation when there is awareness of, and different degrees of attention to, the spatial tactile and kinesthetic trajectories. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
author = "{Van Doorn}, {George Haborym} and Bryan Paton and Howell, {Jacqui Lee} and Jakob Hohwy",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.016",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "147 -- 153",
journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",
issn = "1053-8100",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Attenuated self-tickle sensation even under trajectory perturbation. / Van Doorn, George Haborym; Paton, Bryan; Howell, Jacqui Lee; Hohwy, Jakob.

In: Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 36, 2015, p. 147 - 153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attenuated self-tickle sensation even under trajectory perturbation

AU - Van Doorn, George Haborym

AU - Paton, Bryan

AU - Howell, Jacqui Lee

AU - Hohwy, Jakob

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The efference copy account of the tickle effect (i.e., our inability to tickle ourselves) predicts no tickle effect (i.e., an ability to tickle ourselves) when the trajectory of a tactile stimulus is perturbed relative to the associated movement, and there is evidence in support of this. The active inference account, however, predicts the tickle effect should survive trajectory perturbation. We test these accounts of the tickle effect under the hypothesis that previous findings are due to attentional modulation, and that the tickle effect will be found in a paradigm with no conscious attention directed to the trajectory perturbation. We thus expected to find support for active inference. Our first experiment confirms this hypothesis, while our second seeks to explain previous findings in terms of the modulation of the tickle sensation when there is awareness of, and different degrees of attention to, the spatial tactile and kinesthetic trajectories. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - The efference copy account of the tickle effect (i.e., our inability to tickle ourselves) predicts no tickle effect (i.e., an ability to tickle ourselves) when the trajectory of a tactile stimulus is perturbed relative to the associated movement, and there is evidence in support of this. The active inference account, however, predicts the tickle effect should survive trajectory perturbation. We test these accounts of the tickle effect under the hypothesis that previous findings are due to attentional modulation, and that the tickle effect will be found in a paradigm with no conscious attention directed to the trajectory perturbation. We thus expected to find support for active inference. Our first experiment confirms this hypothesis, while our second seeks to explain previous findings in terms of the modulation of the tickle sensation when there is awareness of, and different degrees of attention to, the spatial tactile and kinesthetic trajectories. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810015300039

U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.016

DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.016

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 147

EP - 153

JO - Consciousness and Cognition

JF - Consciousness and Cognition

SN - 1053-8100

ER -