Associations between number of consecutive night shifts and impairment of neurobehavioral performance during a subsequent simulated night shift

Michelle Magee, Tracey L Sletten, Sally A Ferguson, Ronald R Grunstein, Clare Anderson, David J Kennaway, Steven W Lockley, Shanthakumar MW Rajaratnam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate sleep and circadian phase in the relationships between neurobehavioral performance and the number of consecutive shifts worked.

METHODS: Thirty-four shift workers [20 men, mean age 31.8 (SD 10.9) years] worked 2-7 consecutive night shifts immediately prior to a laboratory-based, simulated night shift. For 7 days prior, participants worked their usual shift sequence, and sleep was assessed with logs and actigraphy. Participants completed a 10-minute auditory psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) at the start (~21:00 hours) and end (~07:00 hours) of the simulated night shift. Mean reaction times (RT), number of lapses and RT distribution was compared between those who worked 2-3 consecutive night shifts versus those who worked 4-7 shifts.

RESULTS: Following 4-7 shifts, night shift workers had significantly longer mean RT at the start and end of shift, compared to those who worked 2-3 shifts. The slowest and fastest 10% RT were significantly slower at the start, but not end, of shift among participants who worked 4-7 nights. Those working 4-7 nights also demonstrated a broader RT distribution at the start and end of shift and had significantly slower RT based on cumulative distribution analysis (5 (th), 25 (th), 50 (th), 75 (th)percentiles at the start of shift; 75th percentile at the end of shift). No group differences in sleep parameters were found for 7 days and 24 hours prior to the simulated night shift.

CONCLUSION: A greater number of consecutive night shifts has a negative impact on neurobehavioral performance, likely due to cognitive slowing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-227
Number of pages11
JournalScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016

Keywords

  • circadian rhythm
  • circadian phase
  • shift work
  • shift worker
  • sleep
  • sustained attention

Cite this

@article{d67fb185263c41ba83fbb319182ce3ca,
title = "Associations between number of consecutive night shifts and impairment of neurobehavioral performance during a subsequent simulated night shift",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate sleep and circadian phase in the relationships between neurobehavioral performance and the number of consecutive shifts worked.METHODS: Thirty-four shift workers [20 men, mean age 31.8 (SD 10.9) years] worked 2-7 consecutive night shifts immediately prior to a laboratory-based, simulated night shift. For 7 days prior, participants worked their usual shift sequence, and sleep was assessed with logs and actigraphy. Participants completed a 10-minute auditory psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) at the start (~21:00 hours) and end (~07:00 hours) of the simulated night shift. Mean reaction times (RT), number of lapses and RT distribution was compared between those who worked 2-3 consecutive night shifts versus those who worked 4-7 shifts.RESULTS: Following 4-7 shifts, night shift workers had significantly longer mean RT at the start and end of shift, compared to those who worked 2-3 shifts. The slowest and fastest 10{\%} RT were significantly slower at the start, but not end, of shift among participants who worked 4-7 nights. Those working 4-7 nights also demonstrated a broader RT distribution at the start and end of shift and had significantly slower RT based on cumulative distribution analysis (5 (th), 25 (th), 50 (th), 75 (th)percentiles at the start of shift; 75th percentile at the end of shift). No group differences in sleep parameters were found for 7 days and 24 hours prior to the simulated night shift.CONCLUSION: A greater number of consecutive night shifts has a negative impact on neurobehavioral performance, likely due to cognitive slowing.",
keywords = "circadian rhythm, circadian phase, shift work, shift worker, sleep, sustained attention",
author = "Michelle Magee and Sletten, {Tracey L} and Ferguson, {Sally A} and Grunstein, {Ronald R} and Clare Anderson and Kennaway, {David J} and Lockley, {Steven W} and Rajaratnam, {Shanthakumar MW}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5271/sjweh.3560",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "217--227",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health",
issn = "0355-3140",
publisher = "Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health",
number = "3",

}

Associations between number of consecutive night shifts and impairment of neurobehavioral performance during a subsequent simulated night shift. / Magee, Michelle; Sletten, Tracey L; Ferguson, Sally A; Grunstein, Ronald R; Anderson, Clare; Kennaway, David J; Lockley, Steven W; Rajaratnam, Shanthakumar MW.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, Vol. 42, No. 3, 01.05.2016, p. 217-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Associations between number of consecutive night shifts and impairment of neurobehavioral performance during a subsequent simulated night shift

AU - Magee, Michelle

AU - Sletten, Tracey L

AU - Ferguson, Sally A

AU - Grunstein, Ronald R

AU - Anderson, Clare

AU - Kennaway, David J

AU - Lockley, Steven W

AU - Rajaratnam, Shanthakumar MW

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate sleep and circadian phase in the relationships between neurobehavioral performance and the number of consecutive shifts worked.METHODS: Thirty-four shift workers [20 men, mean age 31.8 (SD 10.9) years] worked 2-7 consecutive night shifts immediately prior to a laboratory-based, simulated night shift. For 7 days prior, participants worked their usual shift sequence, and sleep was assessed with logs and actigraphy. Participants completed a 10-minute auditory psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) at the start (~21:00 hours) and end (~07:00 hours) of the simulated night shift. Mean reaction times (RT), number of lapses and RT distribution was compared between those who worked 2-3 consecutive night shifts versus those who worked 4-7 shifts.RESULTS: Following 4-7 shifts, night shift workers had significantly longer mean RT at the start and end of shift, compared to those who worked 2-3 shifts. The slowest and fastest 10% RT were significantly slower at the start, but not end, of shift among participants who worked 4-7 nights. Those working 4-7 nights also demonstrated a broader RT distribution at the start and end of shift and had significantly slower RT based on cumulative distribution analysis (5 (th), 25 (th), 50 (th), 75 (th)percentiles at the start of shift; 75th percentile at the end of shift). No group differences in sleep parameters were found for 7 days and 24 hours prior to the simulated night shift.CONCLUSION: A greater number of consecutive night shifts has a negative impact on neurobehavioral performance, likely due to cognitive slowing.

AB - OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate sleep and circadian phase in the relationships between neurobehavioral performance and the number of consecutive shifts worked.METHODS: Thirty-four shift workers [20 men, mean age 31.8 (SD 10.9) years] worked 2-7 consecutive night shifts immediately prior to a laboratory-based, simulated night shift. For 7 days prior, participants worked their usual shift sequence, and sleep was assessed with logs and actigraphy. Participants completed a 10-minute auditory psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) at the start (~21:00 hours) and end (~07:00 hours) of the simulated night shift. Mean reaction times (RT), number of lapses and RT distribution was compared between those who worked 2-3 consecutive night shifts versus those who worked 4-7 shifts.RESULTS: Following 4-7 shifts, night shift workers had significantly longer mean RT at the start and end of shift, compared to those who worked 2-3 shifts. The slowest and fastest 10% RT were significantly slower at the start, but not end, of shift among participants who worked 4-7 nights. Those working 4-7 nights also demonstrated a broader RT distribution at the start and end of shift and had significantly slower RT based on cumulative distribution analysis (5 (th), 25 (th), 50 (th), 75 (th)percentiles at the start of shift; 75th percentile at the end of shift). No group differences in sleep parameters were found for 7 days and 24 hours prior to the simulated night shift.CONCLUSION: A greater number of consecutive night shifts has a negative impact on neurobehavioral performance, likely due to cognitive slowing.

KW - circadian rhythm

KW - circadian phase

KW - shift work

KW - shift worker

KW - sleep

KW - sustained attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015941673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5271/sjweh.3560

DO - 10.5271/sjweh.3560

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 217

EP - 227

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

SN - 0355-3140

IS - 3

ER -