TY - JOUR
T1 - Associations between condom use and rectal or urethral chlamydia infection in men
AU - Hocking, Jane
AU - Fairley, Christopher K.
PY - 2006/4/1
Y1 - 2006/4/1
N2 - Objective: To investigate the association of condom use with chlamydia infection in men attending a large sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic in Australia. Study: Computerized records for all attendances between July 2002 and June 2003 were included and separate analyses were performed for men reporting male-to-male sexual contact (MSM) and for men reporting heterosexual contact only (non-MSM). Associations among age, condom use, and number of partners with chlamydia infection were assessed. Results: Chlamydia was diagnosed at a rate of 8.6 cases per 100 consultations (95% CI: 7.1,10.3) among MSM and at a rate of 6.8 cases per 100 consultations (95% CI: 5.9, 7.8) among non-MSM. Condom use was associated with a lower odds of rectal chlamydia but not urethral infection in MSM. Condom use was associated with lower odds of urethral chlamydia among non-MSM. Conclusions: The findings suggest that condoms do provide some protection against rectal chlamydia infection in MSM and chlamydial urethritis in non-MSM, but other factors may play an important role in the transmission of chlamydial urethritis in MSM.
AB - Objective: To investigate the association of condom use with chlamydia infection in men attending a large sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic in Australia. Study: Computerized records for all attendances between July 2002 and June 2003 were included and separate analyses were performed for men reporting male-to-male sexual contact (MSM) and for men reporting heterosexual contact only (non-MSM). Associations among age, condom use, and number of partners with chlamydia infection were assessed. Results: Chlamydia was diagnosed at a rate of 8.6 cases per 100 consultations (95% CI: 7.1,10.3) among MSM and at a rate of 6.8 cases per 100 consultations (95% CI: 5.9, 7.8) among non-MSM. Condom use was associated with a lower odds of rectal chlamydia but not urethral infection in MSM. Condom use was associated with lower odds of urethral chlamydia among non-MSM. Conclusions: The findings suggest that condoms do provide some protection against rectal chlamydia infection in MSM and chlamydial urethritis in non-MSM, but other factors may play an important role in the transmission of chlamydial urethritis in MSM.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645904195&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.olq.0000187209.02413.0c
DO - 10.1097/01.olq.0000187209.02413.0c
M3 - Article
C2 - 16505741
AN - SCOPUS:33645904195
VL - 33
SP - 256
EP - 258
JO - Sexually Transmitted Diseases
JF - Sexually Transmitted Diseases
SN - 0148-5717
IS - 4
ER -