TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of ventilation volumes, pressures and rates with the mechanical power of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome
T2 - exploring the impact of rate reduction
AU - Buiteman-Kruizinga, Laura A.
AU - van Meenen, David M.P.
AU - Neto, Ary Serpa
AU - Mazzinari, Guido
AU - Bos, Lieuwe D.J.
AU - van der Heiden, Pim L.J.
AU - Paulus, Frederique
AU - Schultz, Marcus J.
AU - for the NEBULAE, PReVENT and RELAx investigators
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Introduction: High mechanical power is associated with mortality in patients who are critically ill and require invasive ventilation. It remains uncertain which components of mechanical power – volume, pressure or rate – increase mechanical power the most. Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a database containing individual patient data from three randomised clinical trials of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary endpoint was mechanical power. We used linear regression; double stratification to create subgroups of participants; and mediation analysis to assess the impact of changes in volumes, pressures and rates on mechanical power. Results: A total of 1732 patients were included and analysed. The median (IQR [range]) mechanical power was 12.3 (9.3–17.1 [3.7–50.1]) J.min-1. In linear regression, respiratory rate (36%) and peak pressure (51%) explained most of the increase in mechanical power. Increasing quintiles of peak pressure stratified on constant levels of respiratory rate resulted in higher risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 2.2 (95%CI 1.8–2.6), p < 0.01), while decreasing quintiles of respiratory rate stratified on constant levels of peak pressure resulted in lower risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 0.2 (95%CI 0.2–0.3), p < 0.01). Mediation analysis showed that a reduction in respiratory rate, with the increase in tidal volume, partially mediates an effect of reduction in mechanical power (average causal mediation effect -0.10, 95%CI -0.12 to -0.09, p < 0.01), but still with a direct effect of tidal volume on mechanical power (average direct effect 0.15, 95%CI 0.11–0.19, p < 0.01). Discussion: In this cohort of patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome, pressure and respiratory rate were the most important determinants of mechanical power. The respiratory rate may be the most attractive ventilator setting to adjust when targeting a lower mechanical power.
AB - Introduction: High mechanical power is associated with mortality in patients who are critically ill and require invasive ventilation. It remains uncertain which components of mechanical power – volume, pressure or rate – increase mechanical power the most. Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a database containing individual patient data from three randomised clinical trials of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary endpoint was mechanical power. We used linear regression; double stratification to create subgroups of participants; and mediation analysis to assess the impact of changes in volumes, pressures and rates on mechanical power. Results: A total of 1732 patients were included and analysed. The median (IQR [range]) mechanical power was 12.3 (9.3–17.1 [3.7–50.1]) J.min-1. In linear regression, respiratory rate (36%) and peak pressure (51%) explained most of the increase in mechanical power. Increasing quintiles of peak pressure stratified on constant levels of respiratory rate resulted in higher risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 2.2 (95%CI 1.8–2.6), p < 0.01), while decreasing quintiles of respiratory rate stratified on constant levels of peak pressure resulted in lower risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 0.2 (95%CI 0.2–0.3), p < 0.01). Mediation analysis showed that a reduction in respiratory rate, with the increase in tidal volume, partially mediates an effect of reduction in mechanical power (average causal mediation effect -0.10, 95%CI -0.12 to -0.09, p < 0.01), but still with a direct effect of tidal volume on mechanical power (average direct effect 0.15, 95%CI 0.11–0.19, p < 0.01). Discussion: In this cohort of patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome, pressure and respiratory rate were the most important determinants of mechanical power. The respiratory rate may be the most attractive ventilator setting to adjust when targeting a lower mechanical power.
KW - driving pressure
KW - lung-protective ventilation
KW - mechanical power
KW - mechanical ventilation
KW - respiratory rate
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85215507401
U2 - 10.1111/anae.16537
DO - 10.1111/anae.16537
M3 - Article
C2 - 39938476
AN - SCOPUS:85215507401
SN - 0003-2409
VL - 80
SP - 533
EP - 542
JO - Anaesthesia
JF - Anaesthesia
IS - 5
ER -