Association between task performance and tender point pain threshold to pressure in normal subjects

Judith Farrell, Geoffrey O. Littlejohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Work action patterns associated with increase in pain sensitivity in healthy people may be valuable predictors of patterns which will cause pain in those with pre-existing low pain threshold. This study aimed to establish whether pain threshold to pressure [PPT], a measure of pain sensitivity, varies in association with task performance, particularly with tasks containing the ergonomic pain risk characteristics of frequent repetition and static muscle work. Method: Designated unilateral manual activity, bilateral manual activity and non-manual activity were examined sequentially. Pain threshold to pressure at two tender points [TeP] was measured bilaterally before and after two hours performance of three unilateral tasks varying in continuous light control and grasp-release; two bilateral tasks, varying in continuous holding, grasp-release and force exertion and one non-manual quiz game. Results: After the unilateral tasks, reduction in PPT at the TeP 2cm distal to the lateral epicondyle was shown on both the active and inactive side without difference in amount of change between tasks or sides. Probability of reduction was greater after grasp-pull-release than light continuous control and was lessened by alternation between these two. After each bilateral task, reduction was shown bilaterally at both TePs, probability at the site 2cm distal to the lateral epicondyle being higher after prolonged holding with repeated force than force following unresisted grasp and release. There was no PPT change after the non-manual task. Conclusion: In normal subjects repetition frequency, static muscle work and force can influence probability of reduced PPT on both the side used and contralateral side, and in fewer cases influence the size of that change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-47
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Musculoskeletal Pain
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jan 1997

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • clinical signs
  • repetitive work

Cite this

@article{c58475089a684b7290ef0eff54f88efc,
title = "Association between task performance and tender point pain threshold to pressure in normal subjects",
abstract = "Work action patterns associated with increase in pain sensitivity in healthy people may be valuable predictors of patterns which will cause pain in those with pre-existing low pain threshold. This study aimed to establish whether pain threshold to pressure [PPT], a measure of pain sensitivity, varies in association with task performance, particularly with tasks containing the ergonomic pain risk characteristics of frequent repetition and static muscle work. Method: Designated unilateral manual activity, bilateral manual activity and non-manual activity were examined sequentially. Pain threshold to pressure at two tender points [TeP] was measured bilaterally before and after two hours performance of three unilateral tasks varying in continuous light control and grasp-release; two bilateral tasks, varying in continuous holding, grasp-release and force exertion and one non-manual quiz game. Results: After the unilateral tasks, reduction in PPT at the TeP 2cm distal to the lateral epicondyle was shown on both the active and inactive side without difference in amount of change between tasks or sides. Probability of reduction was greater after grasp-pull-release than light continuous control and was lessened by alternation between these two. After each bilateral task, reduction was shown bilaterally at both TePs, probability at the site 2cm distal to the lateral epicondyle being higher after prolonged holding with repeated force than force following unresisted grasp and release. There was no PPT change after the non-manual task. Conclusion: In normal subjects repetition frequency, static muscle work and force can influence probability of reduced PPT on both the side used and contralateral side, and in fewer cases influence the size of that change.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, clinical signs, repetitive work",
author = "Judith Farrell and Littlejohn, {Geoffrey O.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1300/J094v05n01_03",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "19--47",
journal = "Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain",
issn = "1058-2452",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Association between task performance and tender point pain threshold to pressure in normal subjects. / Farrell, Judith; Littlejohn, Geoffrey O.

In: Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain, Vol. 5, No. 1, 07.01.1997, p. 19-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association between task performance and tender point pain threshold to pressure in normal subjects

AU - Farrell, Judith

AU - Littlejohn, Geoffrey O.

PY - 1997/1/7

Y1 - 1997/1/7

N2 - Work action patterns associated with increase in pain sensitivity in healthy people may be valuable predictors of patterns which will cause pain in those with pre-existing low pain threshold. This study aimed to establish whether pain threshold to pressure [PPT], a measure of pain sensitivity, varies in association with task performance, particularly with tasks containing the ergonomic pain risk characteristics of frequent repetition and static muscle work. Method: Designated unilateral manual activity, bilateral manual activity and non-manual activity were examined sequentially. Pain threshold to pressure at two tender points [TeP] was measured bilaterally before and after two hours performance of three unilateral tasks varying in continuous light control and grasp-release; two bilateral tasks, varying in continuous holding, grasp-release and force exertion and one non-manual quiz game. Results: After the unilateral tasks, reduction in PPT at the TeP 2cm distal to the lateral epicondyle was shown on both the active and inactive side without difference in amount of change between tasks or sides. Probability of reduction was greater after grasp-pull-release than light continuous control and was lessened by alternation between these two. After each bilateral task, reduction was shown bilaterally at both TePs, probability at the site 2cm distal to the lateral epicondyle being higher after prolonged holding with repeated force than force following unresisted grasp and release. There was no PPT change after the non-manual task. Conclusion: In normal subjects repetition frequency, static muscle work and force can influence probability of reduced PPT on both the side used and contralateral side, and in fewer cases influence the size of that change.

AB - Work action patterns associated with increase in pain sensitivity in healthy people may be valuable predictors of patterns which will cause pain in those with pre-existing low pain threshold. This study aimed to establish whether pain threshold to pressure [PPT], a measure of pain sensitivity, varies in association with task performance, particularly with tasks containing the ergonomic pain risk characteristics of frequent repetition and static muscle work. Method: Designated unilateral manual activity, bilateral manual activity and non-manual activity were examined sequentially. Pain threshold to pressure at two tender points [TeP] was measured bilaterally before and after two hours performance of three unilateral tasks varying in continuous light control and grasp-release; two bilateral tasks, varying in continuous holding, grasp-release and force exertion and one non-manual quiz game. Results: After the unilateral tasks, reduction in PPT at the TeP 2cm distal to the lateral epicondyle was shown on both the active and inactive side without difference in amount of change between tasks or sides. Probability of reduction was greater after grasp-pull-release than light continuous control and was lessened by alternation between these two. After each bilateral task, reduction was shown bilaterally at both TePs, probability at the site 2cm distal to the lateral epicondyle being higher after prolonged holding with repeated force than force following unresisted grasp and release. There was no PPT change after the non-manual task. Conclusion: In normal subjects repetition frequency, static muscle work and force can influence probability of reduced PPT on both the side used and contralateral side, and in fewer cases influence the size of that change.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - clinical signs

KW - repetitive work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031036338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J094v05n01_03

DO - 10.1300/J094v05n01_03

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031036338

VL - 5

SP - 19

EP - 47

JO - Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain

JF - Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain

SN - 1058-2452

IS - 1

ER -