Assigned versus assumed

towards a contemporary, detailed understanding of subsidiary autonomy

Andrew Cavanagh, Susan Freeman, Paul Kalfadellis, Kendall Herbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper critically documents the rise of autonomy in subsidiary management literature, and develops an agenda for future research in this key area. Integrating and updating the seminal works of Paterson and Brock (2002) and Young and Tavares (2004), the paper begins with a critical review of subsidiary autonomy within the streams of subsidiary management literature. This leads to an assessment of the key contemporary issues requiring further investigation. These issues center around two key types of autonomy: assigned and assumed. We argue these types represent a more accurate, in-depth conceptualization of subsidiary autonomy, and also have significant implications for key related topics, including subsidiary development. This is depicted in an integrative model that draws upon agency theory, the network model of the MNE, the decision process perspective and the bundling model in presenting a revised view of subsidiary autonomy, and offers a basis for further research within the field.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1168-1183
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Business Review
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Agency theory
  • Bundling model
  • Decision process perspective
  • Literature review
  • Network model
  • Subsidiary autonomy

Cite this

@article{d20d31fb0fb24b829437b72a16dcc546,
title = "Assigned versus assumed: towards a contemporary, detailed understanding of subsidiary autonomy",
abstract = "This paper critically documents the rise of autonomy in subsidiary management literature, and develops an agenda for future research in this key area. Integrating and updating the seminal works of Paterson and Brock (2002) and Young and Tavares (2004), the paper begins with a critical review of subsidiary autonomy within the streams of subsidiary management literature. This leads to an assessment of the key contemporary issues requiring further investigation. These issues center around two key types of autonomy: assigned and assumed. We argue these types represent a more accurate, in-depth conceptualization of subsidiary autonomy, and also have significant implications for key related topics, including subsidiary development. This is depicted in an integrative model that draws upon agency theory, the network model of the MNE, the decision process perspective and the bundling model in presenting a revised view of subsidiary autonomy, and offers a basis for further research within the field.",
keywords = "Agency theory, Bundling model, Decision process perspective, Literature review, Network model, Subsidiary autonomy",
author = "Andrew Cavanagh and Susan Freeman and Paul Kalfadellis and Kendall Herbert",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.04.007",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1168--1183",
journal = "International Business Review",
issn = "0969-5931",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Assigned versus assumed : towards a contemporary, detailed understanding of subsidiary autonomy. / Cavanagh, Andrew; Freeman, Susan; Kalfadellis, Paul; Herbert, Kendall.

In: International Business Review, Vol. 26, No. 6, 12.2017, p. 1168-1183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assigned versus assumed

T2 - towards a contemporary, detailed understanding of subsidiary autonomy

AU - Cavanagh, Andrew

AU - Freeman, Susan

AU - Kalfadellis, Paul

AU - Herbert, Kendall

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - This paper critically documents the rise of autonomy in subsidiary management literature, and develops an agenda for future research in this key area. Integrating and updating the seminal works of Paterson and Brock (2002) and Young and Tavares (2004), the paper begins with a critical review of subsidiary autonomy within the streams of subsidiary management literature. This leads to an assessment of the key contemporary issues requiring further investigation. These issues center around two key types of autonomy: assigned and assumed. We argue these types represent a more accurate, in-depth conceptualization of subsidiary autonomy, and also have significant implications for key related topics, including subsidiary development. This is depicted in an integrative model that draws upon agency theory, the network model of the MNE, the decision process perspective and the bundling model in presenting a revised view of subsidiary autonomy, and offers a basis for further research within the field.

AB - This paper critically documents the rise of autonomy in subsidiary management literature, and develops an agenda for future research in this key area. Integrating and updating the seminal works of Paterson and Brock (2002) and Young and Tavares (2004), the paper begins with a critical review of subsidiary autonomy within the streams of subsidiary management literature. This leads to an assessment of the key contemporary issues requiring further investigation. These issues center around two key types of autonomy: assigned and assumed. We argue these types represent a more accurate, in-depth conceptualization of subsidiary autonomy, and also have significant implications for key related topics, including subsidiary development. This is depicted in an integrative model that draws upon agency theory, the network model of the MNE, the decision process perspective and the bundling model in presenting a revised view of subsidiary autonomy, and offers a basis for further research within the field.

KW - Agency theory

KW - Bundling model

KW - Decision process perspective

KW - Literature review

KW - Network model

KW - Subsidiary autonomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018926131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.04.007

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1168

EP - 1183

JO - International Business Review

JF - International Business Review

SN - 0969-5931

IS - 6

ER -