Assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity by medical record review compared with direct standardized evaluation

Anita E. Wluka, Matthew H. Liang, Alison J. Partridge, Anne H. Fossel, Elizabeth A. Wright, Robert A. Lew, Elizabeth W. Karlson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. Clinical studies of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often necessitate assessment of previous disease activity, which is sometimes only possible by retrospective evaluation of information from the medical record. Using the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), the present study compared an assessment of disease activity obtained by chart abstraction with a direct clinical assessment. Methods. A chart SLAM was obtained using information abstracted from the clinic notes of 46 patients with SLE who were being followed up at a referral center. Chart SLAM scores were compared with SLAM scores derived from an independent assessor's direct clinical evaluation. Results. Direct SLAM and chart SLAM scores were correlated (r = 0.67 by Spearman's rank correlation, P = 0.0001). Chart review scores for disease activity tended to be lower, but to an inconsistent degree, reflecting both under- and overestimation of disease activity. The overall misclassification rate on a 3-category scale (mild, moderate, or severe activity) was 59%. Conclusion. Although chart SLAM scores were highly correlated with direct SLAM scores, misclassification of disease activity by chart review cannot be rectified. Thus, in research, medical record review should not be used as a proxy for the direct SLAM, nor should it be considered comparable with clinical assessments in the analysis of disease activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-61
Number of pages5
JournalArthritis and Rheumatism
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1997
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Wluka, Anita E. ; Liang, Matthew H. ; Partridge, Alison J. ; Fossel, Anne H. ; Wright, Elizabeth A. ; Lew, Robert A. ; Karlson, Elizabeth W. / Assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity by medical record review compared with direct standardized evaluation. In: Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1997 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 57-61.
@article{0384444f2a3943768760dcbb348acb1c,
title = "Assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity by medical record review compared with direct standardized evaluation",
abstract = "Objective. Clinical studies of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often necessitate assessment of previous disease activity, which is sometimes only possible by retrospective evaluation of information from the medical record. Using the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), the present study compared an assessment of disease activity obtained by chart abstraction with a direct clinical assessment. Methods. A chart SLAM was obtained using information abstracted from the clinic notes of 46 patients with SLE who were being followed up at a referral center. Chart SLAM scores were compared with SLAM scores derived from an independent assessor's direct clinical evaluation. Results. Direct SLAM and chart SLAM scores were correlated (r = 0.67 by Spearman's rank correlation, P = 0.0001). Chart review scores for disease activity tended to be lower, but to an inconsistent degree, reflecting both under- and overestimation of disease activity. The overall misclassification rate on a 3-category scale (mild, moderate, or severe activity) was 59{\%}. Conclusion. Although chart SLAM scores were highly correlated with direct SLAM scores, misclassification of disease activity by chart review cannot be rectified. Thus, in research, medical record review should not be used as a proxy for the direct SLAM, nor should it be considered comparable with clinical assessments in the analysis of disease activity.",
author = "Wluka, {Anita E.} and Liang, {Matthew H.} and Partridge, {Alison J.} and Fossel, {Anne H.} and Wright, {Elizabeth A.} and Lew, {Robert A.} and Karlson, {Elizabeth W.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/art.1780400109",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "57--61",
journal = "Arthritis and Rheumatology",
issn = "2326-5191",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity by medical record review compared with direct standardized evaluation. / Wluka, Anita E.; Liang, Matthew H.; Partridge, Alison J.; Fossel, Anne H.; Wright, Elizabeth A.; Lew, Robert A.; Karlson, Elizabeth W.

In: Arthritis and Rheumatism, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.1997, p. 57-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity by medical record review compared with direct standardized evaluation

AU - Wluka, Anita E.

AU - Liang, Matthew H.

AU - Partridge, Alison J.

AU - Fossel, Anne H.

AU - Wright, Elizabeth A.

AU - Lew, Robert A.

AU - Karlson, Elizabeth W.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Objective. Clinical studies of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often necessitate assessment of previous disease activity, which is sometimes only possible by retrospective evaluation of information from the medical record. Using the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), the present study compared an assessment of disease activity obtained by chart abstraction with a direct clinical assessment. Methods. A chart SLAM was obtained using information abstracted from the clinic notes of 46 patients with SLE who were being followed up at a referral center. Chart SLAM scores were compared with SLAM scores derived from an independent assessor's direct clinical evaluation. Results. Direct SLAM and chart SLAM scores were correlated (r = 0.67 by Spearman's rank correlation, P = 0.0001). Chart review scores for disease activity tended to be lower, but to an inconsistent degree, reflecting both under- and overestimation of disease activity. The overall misclassification rate on a 3-category scale (mild, moderate, or severe activity) was 59%. Conclusion. Although chart SLAM scores were highly correlated with direct SLAM scores, misclassification of disease activity by chart review cannot be rectified. Thus, in research, medical record review should not be used as a proxy for the direct SLAM, nor should it be considered comparable with clinical assessments in the analysis of disease activity.

AB - Objective. Clinical studies of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often necessitate assessment of previous disease activity, which is sometimes only possible by retrospective evaluation of information from the medical record. Using the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), the present study compared an assessment of disease activity obtained by chart abstraction with a direct clinical assessment. Methods. A chart SLAM was obtained using information abstracted from the clinic notes of 46 patients with SLE who were being followed up at a referral center. Chart SLAM scores were compared with SLAM scores derived from an independent assessor's direct clinical evaluation. Results. Direct SLAM and chart SLAM scores were correlated (r = 0.67 by Spearman's rank correlation, P = 0.0001). Chart review scores for disease activity tended to be lower, but to an inconsistent degree, reflecting both under- and overestimation of disease activity. The overall misclassification rate on a 3-category scale (mild, moderate, or severe activity) was 59%. Conclusion. Although chart SLAM scores were highly correlated with direct SLAM scores, misclassification of disease activity by chart review cannot be rectified. Thus, in research, medical record review should not be used as a proxy for the direct SLAM, nor should it be considered comparable with clinical assessments in the analysis of disease activity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031020292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/art.1780400109

DO - 10.1002/art.1780400109

M3 - Article

C2 - 9008600

AN - SCOPUS:0031020292

VL - 40

SP - 57

EP - 61

JO - Arthritis and Rheumatology

JF - Arthritis and Rheumatology

SN - 2326-5191

IS - 1

ER -