Assessing the sensitivity of biodiversity indices used to inform fire management

Katherine M. Giljohann, Luke T. Kelly, Jemima Connell, Michael F. Clarke, Rohan H. Clarke, Tracey J. Regan, Michael A. McCarthy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

1. Biodiversity indices are widely used to summarise changes in the distribution and abundance of multiple species and measure progress towards management targets. However, the sensitivity of biodiversity indices to the data, landscape classification and conservation values underpinning them are rarely interrogated. There are limited studies to help scientists and land managers use biodiversity indices in the presence of fire and vegetation succession.
2. The geometric mean of species’ relative abundance or occurrence (G) is a biodiversity index that can be used to determine the mix of post-fire vegetation that maximizes biodiversity. We explored the sensitivity of G to i) type of biodiversity data, ii) representation of ecosystem states, iii) expression of conservation values and iv) uncertainty in species’ response to landscape structure. Our case study is an area of fire-prone woodland in southern Australia where G is used in fire management planning. We analysed three data sets to determine the fire responses of 170 bird, mammal and reptile species.
3. G and fire management targets were sensitive to the species included in the analysis. The optimal mix of vegetation successional states for threatened birds was more narrowly defined than the optimal mix for all species combined. G was less sensitive to successional classification (i.e. number of states); although classifications of increasing complexity provided additional insights into desirable levels of heterogeneity.
4. Weighting species by conservation status or endemism influenced the mix of vegetation states that maximized biodiversity. When a higher value was placed on threatened species the importance of late successional vegetation was emphasized.
5. Representing variation in individual species’ response to vegetation structure made it clearer when a decrease in G was likely to reflect a significant reduction in species occurrences.
6. Synthesis and applications. Data, models and conservation values can be combined using biodiversity indices to make robust environmental decisions. Combining different types of biodiversity data using composite indices, such as the geometric mean, can improve the coverage and relevance of biodiversity indices. We recommend that evaluation of biodiversity indices for fire management verify how index assumptions align with management objectives, consider the relative merits of different types of biodiversity data, test sensitivity of ecosystem state definitions and incorporate conservation values through species weightings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461-471
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • classification
  • decision-making
  • fire
  • geometric mean
  • indicators
  • management
  • optimization
  • policy
  • relative abundance
  • weighting

Cite this

Giljohann, K. M., Kelly, L. T., Connell, J., Clarke, M. F., Clarke, R. H., Regan, T. J., & McCarthy, M. A. (2018). Assessing the sensitivity of biodiversity indices used to inform fire management. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55(2), 461-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13006
Giljohann, Katherine M. ; Kelly, Luke T. ; Connell, Jemima ; Clarke, Michael F. ; Clarke, Rohan H. ; Regan, Tracey J. ; McCarthy, Michael A. / Assessing the sensitivity of biodiversity indices used to inform fire management. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018 ; Vol. 55, No. 2. pp. 461-471.
@article{016d8b2b4edb404a9e4b82dcd6c5f3a5,
title = "Assessing the sensitivity of biodiversity indices used to inform fire management",
abstract = "1. Biodiversity indices are widely used to summarise changes in the distribution and abundance of multiple species and measure progress towards management targets. However, the sensitivity of biodiversity indices to the data, landscape classification and conservation values underpinning them are rarely interrogated. There are limited studies to help scientists and land managers use biodiversity indices in the presence of fire and vegetation succession.2. The geometric mean of species’ relative abundance or occurrence (G) is a biodiversity index that can be used to determine the mix of post-fire vegetation that maximizes biodiversity. We explored the sensitivity of G to i) type of biodiversity data, ii) representation of ecosystem states, iii) expression of conservation values and iv) uncertainty in species’ response to landscape structure. Our case study is an area of fire-prone woodland in southern Australia where G is used in fire management planning. We analysed three data sets to determine the fire responses of 170 bird, mammal and reptile species.3. G and fire management targets were sensitive to the species included in the analysis. The optimal mix of vegetation successional states for threatened birds was more narrowly defined than the optimal mix for all species combined. G was less sensitive to successional classification (i.e. number of states); although classifications of increasing complexity provided additional insights into desirable levels of heterogeneity.4. Weighting species by conservation status or endemism influenced the mix of vegetation states that maximized biodiversity. When a higher value was placed on threatened species the importance of late successional vegetation was emphasized.5. Representing variation in individual species’ response to vegetation structure made it clearer when a decrease in G was likely to reflect a significant reduction in species occurrences.6. Synthesis and applications. Data, models and conservation values can be combined using biodiversity indices to make robust environmental decisions. Combining different types of biodiversity data using composite indices, such as the geometric mean, can improve the coverage and relevance of biodiversity indices. We recommend that evaluation of biodiversity indices for fire management verify how index assumptions align with management objectives, consider the relative merits of different types of biodiversity data, test sensitivity of ecosystem state definitions and incorporate conservation values through species weightings.",
keywords = "classification, decision-making, fire, geometric mean, indicators, management, optimization, policy, relative abundance, weighting",
author = "Giljohann, {Katherine M.} and Kelly, {Luke T.} and Jemima Connell and Clarke, {Michael F.} and Clarke, {Rohan H.} and Regan, {Tracey J.} and McCarthy, {Michael A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13006",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "461--471",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Giljohann, KM, Kelly, LT, Connell, J, Clarke, MF, Clarke, RH, Regan, TJ & McCarthy, MA 2018, 'Assessing the sensitivity of biodiversity indices used to inform fire management' Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 461-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13006

Assessing the sensitivity of biodiversity indices used to inform fire management. / Giljohann, Katherine M.; Kelly, Luke T.; Connell, Jemima; Clarke, Michael F.; Clarke, Rohan H.; Regan, Tracey J.; McCarthy, Michael A.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 55, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 461-471.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the sensitivity of biodiversity indices used to inform fire management

AU - Giljohann, Katherine M.

AU - Kelly, Luke T.

AU - Connell, Jemima

AU - Clarke, Michael F.

AU - Clarke, Rohan H.

AU - Regan, Tracey J.

AU - McCarthy, Michael A.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - 1. Biodiversity indices are widely used to summarise changes in the distribution and abundance of multiple species and measure progress towards management targets. However, the sensitivity of biodiversity indices to the data, landscape classification and conservation values underpinning them are rarely interrogated. There are limited studies to help scientists and land managers use biodiversity indices in the presence of fire and vegetation succession.2. The geometric mean of species’ relative abundance or occurrence (G) is a biodiversity index that can be used to determine the mix of post-fire vegetation that maximizes biodiversity. We explored the sensitivity of G to i) type of biodiversity data, ii) representation of ecosystem states, iii) expression of conservation values and iv) uncertainty in species’ response to landscape structure. Our case study is an area of fire-prone woodland in southern Australia where G is used in fire management planning. We analysed three data sets to determine the fire responses of 170 bird, mammal and reptile species.3. G and fire management targets were sensitive to the species included in the analysis. The optimal mix of vegetation successional states for threatened birds was more narrowly defined than the optimal mix for all species combined. G was less sensitive to successional classification (i.e. number of states); although classifications of increasing complexity provided additional insights into desirable levels of heterogeneity.4. Weighting species by conservation status or endemism influenced the mix of vegetation states that maximized biodiversity. When a higher value was placed on threatened species the importance of late successional vegetation was emphasized.5. Representing variation in individual species’ response to vegetation structure made it clearer when a decrease in G was likely to reflect a significant reduction in species occurrences.6. Synthesis and applications. Data, models and conservation values can be combined using biodiversity indices to make robust environmental decisions. Combining different types of biodiversity data using composite indices, such as the geometric mean, can improve the coverage and relevance of biodiversity indices. We recommend that evaluation of biodiversity indices for fire management verify how index assumptions align with management objectives, consider the relative merits of different types of biodiversity data, test sensitivity of ecosystem state definitions and incorporate conservation values through species weightings.

AB - 1. Biodiversity indices are widely used to summarise changes in the distribution and abundance of multiple species and measure progress towards management targets. However, the sensitivity of biodiversity indices to the data, landscape classification and conservation values underpinning them are rarely interrogated. There are limited studies to help scientists and land managers use biodiversity indices in the presence of fire and vegetation succession.2. The geometric mean of species’ relative abundance or occurrence (G) is a biodiversity index that can be used to determine the mix of post-fire vegetation that maximizes biodiversity. We explored the sensitivity of G to i) type of biodiversity data, ii) representation of ecosystem states, iii) expression of conservation values and iv) uncertainty in species’ response to landscape structure. Our case study is an area of fire-prone woodland in southern Australia where G is used in fire management planning. We analysed three data sets to determine the fire responses of 170 bird, mammal and reptile species.3. G and fire management targets were sensitive to the species included in the analysis. The optimal mix of vegetation successional states for threatened birds was more narrowly defined than the optimal mix for all species combined. G was less sensitive to successional classification (i.e. number of states); although classifications of increasing complexity provided additional insights into desirable levels of heterogeneity.4. Weighting species by conservation status or endemism influenced the mix of vegetation states that maximized biodiversity. When a higher value was placed on threatened species the importance of late successional vegetation was emphasized.5. Representing variation in individual species’ response to vegetation structure made it clearer when a decrease in G was likely to reflect a significant reduction in species occurrences.6. Synthesis and applications. Data, models and conservation values can be combined using biodiversity indices to make robust environmental decisions. Combining different types of biodiversity data using composite indices, such as the geometric mean, can improve the coverage and relevance of biodiversity indices. We recommend that evaluation of biodiversity indices for fire management verify how index assumptions align with management objectives, consider the relative merits of different types of biodiversity data, test sensitivity of ecosystem state definitions and incorporate conservation values through species weightings.

KW - classification

KW - decision-making

KW - fire

KW - geometric mean

KW - indicators

KW - management

KW - optimization

KW - policy

KW - relative abundance

KW - weighting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041959569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13006

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13006

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 461

EP - 471

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 2

ER -