Abstract
We present two studies to assess which physical factors influence 3D object movement tasks with various input devices. Since past research has shown that a mouse with suitable mapping techniques can serve as a good input device for some 3D object movement tasks, we also evaluate which characteristics of the mouse sustain its success. Our first study evaluates the effect of a supporting surface across orientation of input device movement and display orientation. A 3D tracking device was used in all conditions for consistency. The results of this study are inconclusive; no significant differences were found between the factors examined. The results of a second study show that the mouse outperforms the tracker for speed in all instances. The presence of support also improved accuracy when tracker movement is limited to 2D operation. A 3DOF movement mode performed worst overall.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 3DUI - IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces 2008 |
| Publisher | IEEE, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
| Pages | 43-50 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781424420476 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces 3DUI 2008 - Reno, United States of America Duration: 8 Mar 2008 → 9 Mar 2008 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/4472101/proceeding (Proceedings) |
Conference
| Conference | IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces 3DUI 2008 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | 3DUI 2008 |
| Country/Territory | United States of America |
| City | Reno |
| Period | 8/03/08 → 9/03/08 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- 3D manipulation
- Comparing devices
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver