Assessing distributed leadership for learning and teaching quality: a multi-institutional study

Angela Carbone, Julia Evans, Bella Ross, Steve Drew, Liam Phelan, Katherine Lindsay, Caroline Cottman, Sue Stoney, Jing Ye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Distributed leadership has been explored internationally as a leadership model that will promote and advance excellence in learning and teaching in higher education. This paper presents an assessment of how effectively distributed leadership was enabled at five Australian institutions implementing a collaborative teaching quality development scheme called the Peer Assisted Teaching Scheme. The Scheme brings together expertise from teams of academics, coordinators, and institutional learning and teaching portfolio holders to the shared goal of enhancing learning and teaching quality. A distributed leadership benchmarking tool was used to assess the Scheme’s effectiveness, and we found that (i) the Scheme is highly consistent with the distributed leadership benchmarks, and that (ii) the benchmarking tool is easily used in assessing the alignment (or otherwise) of teaching and learning quality initiatives with distributed leadership benchmarks. This paper will be of interest to those seeking to assess implementations of distributed leadership to improve teaching quality and leadership capacity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-196
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • Collaborative professional development;
  • higher education
  • peer assisted teaching scheme

Cite this

Carbone, Angela ; Evans, Julia ; Ross, Bella ; Drew, Steve ; Phelan, Liam ; Lindsay, Katherine ; Cottman, Caroline ; Stoney, Sue ; Ye, Jing. / Assessing distributed leadership for learning and teaching quality : a multi-institutional study. In: Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2017 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 183-196.
@article{fcd07dfaa949426da97b9ae19c6616a8,
title = "Assessing distributed leadership for learning and teaching quality: a multi-institutional study",
abstract = "Distributed leadership has been explored internationally as a leadership model that will promote and advance excellence in learning and teaching in higher education. This paper presents an assessment of how effectively distributed leadership was enabled at five Australian institutions implementing a collaborative teaching quality development scheme called the Peer Assisted Teaching Scheme. The Scheme brings together expertise from teams of academics, coordinators, and institutional learning and teaching portfolio holders to the shared goal of enhancing learning and teaching quality. A distributed leadership benchmarking tool was used to assess the Scheme’s effectiveness, and we found that (i) the Scheme is highly consistent with the distributed leadership benchmarks, and that (ii) the benchmarking tool is easily used in assessing the alignment (or otherwise) of teaching and learning quality initiatives with distributed leadership benchmarks. This paper will be of interest to those seeking to assess implementations of distributed leadership to improve teaching quality and leadership capacity.",
keywords = "Collaborative professional development;, higher education, peer assisted teaching scheme",
author = "Angela Carbone and Julia Evans and Bella Ross and Steve Drew and Liam Phelan and Katherine Lindsay and Caroline Cottman and Sue Stoney and Jing Ye",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/1360080X.2017.1276629",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "183--196",
journal = "Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management",
issn = "1360-080X",
publisher = "Brunner-Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Assessing distributed leadership for learning and teaching quality : a multi-institutional study. / Carbone, Angela; Evans, Julia; Ross, Bella; Drew, Steve; Phelan, Liam; Lindsay, Katherine; Cottman, Caroline; Stoney, Sue; Ye, Jing.

In: Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 39, No. 2, 04.03.2017, p. 183-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing distributed leadership for learning and teaching quality

T2 - a multi-institutional study

AU - Carbone, Angela

AU - Evans, Julia

AU - Ross, Bella

AU - Drew, Steve

AU - Phelan, Liam

AU - Lindsay, Katherine

AU - Cottman, Caroline

AU - Stoney, Sue

AU - Ye, Jing

PY - 2017/3/4

Y1 - 2017/3/4

N2 - Distributed leadership has been explored internationally as a leadership model that will promote and advance excellence in learning and teaching in higher education. This paper presents an assessment of how effectively distributed leadership was enabled at five Australian institutions implementing a collaborative teaching quality development scheme called the Peer Assisted Teaching Scheme. The Scheme brings together expertise from teams of academics, coordinators, and institutional learning and teaching portfolio holders to the shared goal of enhancing learning and teaching quality. A distributed leadership benchmarking tool was used to assess the Scheme’s effectiveness, and we found that (i) the Scheme is highly consistent with the distributed leadership benchmarks, and that (ii) the benchmarking tool is easily used in assessing the alignment (or otherwise) of teaching and learning quality initiatives with distributed leadership benchmarks. This paper will be of interest to those seeking to assess implementations of distributed leadership to improve teaching quality and leadership capacity.

AB - Distributed leadership has been explored internationally as a leadership model that will promote and advance excellence in learning and teaching in higher education. This paper presents an assessment of how effectively distributed leadership was enabled at five Australian institutions implementing a collaborative teaching quality development scheme called the Peer Assisted Teaching Scheme. The Scheme brings together expertise from teams of academics, coordinators, and institutional learning and teaching portfolio holders to the shared goal of enhancing learning and teaching quality. A distributed leadership benchmarking tool was used to assess the Scheme’s effectiveness, and we found that (i) the Scheme is highly consistent with the distributed leadership benchmarks, and that (ii) the benchmarking tool is easily used in assessing the alignment (or otherwise) of teaching and learning quality initiatives with distributed leadership benchmarks. This paper will be of interest to those seeking to assess implementations of distributed leadership to improve teaching quality and leadership capacity.

KW - Collaborative professional development;

KW - higher education

KW - peer assisted teaching scheme

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011961337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1360080X.2017.1276629

DO - 10.1080/1360080X.2017.1276629

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 183

EP - 196

JO - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

JF - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

SN - 1360-080X

IS - 2

ER -