Assessing distributed leadership for learning and teaching quality: a multi-institutional study

Angela Carbone, Julia Evans, Bella Ross, Steve Drew, Liam Phelan, Katherine Lindsay, Caroline Cottman, Sue Stoney, Jing Ye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Distributed leadership has been explored internationally as a leadership model that will promote and advance excellence in learning and teaching in higher education. This paper presents an assessment of how effectively distributed leadership was enabled at five Australian institutions implementing a collaborative teaching quality development scheme called the Peer Assisted Teaching Scheme. The Scheme brings together expertise from teams of academics, coordinators, and institutional learning and teaching portfolio holders to the shared goal of enhancing learning and teaching quality. A distributed leadership benchmarking tool was used to assess the Scheme’s effectiveness, and we found that (i) the Scheme is highly consistent with the distributed leadership benchmarks, and that (ii) the benchmarking tool is easily used in assessing the alignment (or otherwise) of teaching and learning quality initiatives with distributed leadership benchmarks. This paper will be of interest to those seeking to assess implementations of distributed leadership to improve teaching quality and leadership capacity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-196
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • Collaborative professional development;
  • higher education
  • peer assisted teaching scheme

Cite this