TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing distributed leadership for learning and teaching quality
T2 - a multi-institutional study
AU - Carbone, Angela
AU - Evans, Julia
AU - Ross, Bella
AU - Drew, Steve
AU - Phelan, Liam
AU - Lindsay, Katherine
AU - Cottman, Caroline
AU - Stoney, Sue
AU - Ye, Jing
PY - 2017/3/4
Y1 - 2017/3/4
N2 - Distributed leadership has been explored internationally as a leadership model that will promote and advance excellence in learning and teaching in higher education. This paper presents an assessment of how effectively distributed leadership was enabled at five Australian institutions implementing a collaborative teaching quality development scheme called the Peer Assisted Teaching Scheme. The Scheme brings together expertise from teams of academics, coordinators, and institutional learning and teaching portfolio holders to the shared goal of enhancing learning and teaching quality. A distributed leadership benchmarking tool was used to assess the Scheme’s effectiveness, and we found that (i) the Scheme is highly consistent with the distributed leadership benchmarks, and that (ii) the benchmarking tool is easily used in assessing the alignment (or otherwise) of teaching and learning quality initiatives with distributed leadership benchmarks. This paper will be of interest to those seeking to assess implementations of distributed leadership to improve teaching quality and leadership capacity.
AB - Distributed leadership has been explored internationally as a leadership model that will promote and advance excellence in learning and teaching in higher education. This paper presents an assessment of how effectively distributed leadership was enabled at five Australian institutions implementing a collaborative teaching quality development scheme called the Peer Assisted Teaching Scheme. The Scheme brings together expertise from teams of academics, coordinators, and institutional learning and teaching portfolio holders to the shared goal of enhancing learning and teaching quality. A distributed leadership benchmarking tool was used to assess the Scheme’s effectiveness, and we found that (i) the Scheme is highly consistent with the distributed leadership benchmarks, and that (ii) the benchmarking tool is easily used in assessing the alignment (or otherwise) of teaching and learning quality initiatives with distributed leadership benchmarks. This paper will be of interest to those seeking to assess implementations of distributed leadership to improve teaching quality and leadership capacity.
KW - Collaborative professional development;
KW - higher education
KW - peer assisted teaching scheme
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011961337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1360080X.2017.1276629
DO - 10.1080/1360080X.2017.1276629
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85011961337
VL - 39
SP - 183
EP - 196
JO - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
JF - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
SN - 1360-080X
IS - 2
ER -