Abstract
Artificial intelligence has recently gained popularity across different medical fields to aid in the detection of diseases based on pathology samples or medical imaging findings. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a key assessment tool for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The role of machine learning and artificial intelligence to increase detection of brain abnormalities in TLE remains inconclusive. We used support vector machine (SV) and deep learning (DL) models based on region of interest (ROI-based) structural (n = 336) and diffusion (n = 863) brain MRI data from patients with TLE with (“lesional”) and without (“non-lesional”) radiographic features suggestive of underlying hippocampal sclerosis from the multinational (multi-center) ENIGMA-Epilepsy consortium. Our data showed that models to identify TLE performed better or similar (68–75%) compared to models to lateralize the side of TLE (56–73%, except structural-based) based on diffusion data with the opposite pattern seen for structural data (67–75% to diagnose vs. 83% to lateralize). In other aspects, structural and diffusion-based models showed similar classification accuracies. Our classification models for patients with hippocampal sclerosis were more accurate (68–76%) than models that stratified non-lesional patients (53–62%). Overall, SV and DL models performed similarly with several instances in which SV mildly outperformed DL. We discuss the relative performance of these models with ROI-level data and the implications for future applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in epilepsy care.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 102765 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | NeuroImage: Clinical |
Volume | 31 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- Artificial inteligence
- Epilepsy
- Machine learning
- Temporal lobe epilepsy
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: NeuroImage: Clinical, Vol. 31, 102765, 2021.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial intelligence for classification of temporal lobe epilepsy with ROI-level MRI data
T2 - A worldwide ENIGMA-Epilepsy study
AU - Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel
AU - Munsell, Brent C.
AU - Alhusaini, Saud
AU - Alvim, Marina K.M.
AU - Bargalló, Núria
AU - Bender, Benjamin
AU - Bernasconi, Andrea
AU - Bernasconi, Neda
AU - Bernhardt, Boris
AU - Blackmon, Karen
AU - Caligiuri, Maria Eugenia
AU - Cendes, Fernando
AU - Concha, Luis
AU - Desmond, Patricia M.
AU - Devinsky, Orrin
AU - Doherty, Colin P.
AU - Domin, Martin
AU - Duncan, John S.
AU - Focke, Niels K.
AU - Gambardella, Antonio
AU - Gong, Bo
AU - Guerrini, Renzo
AU - Hatton, Sean N.
AU - Kälviäinen, Reetta
AU - Keller, Simon S.
AU - Kochunov, Peter
AU - Kotikalapudi, Raviteja
AU - Kreilkamp, Barbara A.K.
AU - Labate, Angelo
AU - Langner, Soenke
AU - Larivière, Sara
AU - Lenge, Matteo
AU - Lui, Elaine
AU - Martin, Pascal
AU - Mascalchi, Mario
AU - Meletti, Stefano
AU - O'Brien, Terence J.
AU - Pardoe, Heath R.
AU - Pariente, Jose C.
AU - Xian Rao, Jun
AU - Richardson, Mark P.
AU - Rodríguez-Cruces, Raúl
AU - Rüber, Theodor
AU - Sinclair, Ben
AU - Soltanian-Zadeh, Hamid
AU - Stein, Dan J.
AU - Striano, Pasquale
AU - Taylor, Peter N.
AU - Thomas, Rhys H.
AU - Elisabetta Vaudano, Anna
AU - Vivash, Lucy
AU - von Podewills, Felix
AU - Vos, Sjoerd B.
AU - Weber, Bernd
AU - Yao, Yi
AU - Lin Yasuda, Clarissa
AU - Zhang, Junsong
AU - Thompson, Paul M.
AU - Sisodiya, Sanjay M.
AU - McDonald, Carrie R.
AU - Bonilha, Leonardo
AU - ENIGMA-Epilepsy Working Group
N1 - Funding Information: S.La. is funded by CIHR. P.M. was supported by the PATE program (F1315030) of the University of Tübingen. S.M. is supported by Italian Ministry of Health funding grant NET-2013-02355313. T.J. is supported by NHMRC Program Grant. M.R. is supported by Medical Research Council programme grant (MR/K013998/1); Medical Research Council Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders (MR/N026063/1); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsely NHS Foundation Trust. R.R.-C. is supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS-291486). D.J.S. is supported by SA Medical Research Council. Work developed within the framework of the DINOGMI Department of Excellence of MIUR 2018–2022 (legge 232 del 2016). R.H.T. is supported by Epilepsy Research UK. C.L.Y. is supported by FAPESP - BRAINN (2013/07599-3); CNPQ (403726/2016-6). J.S.Z. is supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 61772440). C.R.M. is supported by NIH R01 NS065838; R21 NS107739. L.B. is supported by R01NS110347 (NIH/NINDS). A.A. holds an MRC eMedLab Medical Bioinformatics Career Development Fellowship; this work was partly supported by the Medical Research Council [grant number MR/L016311/ 1]. R.W. received support from the Swiss League Against Epilepsy. Core funding for ENIGMA was provided by the NIH Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) program under consortium grant U54 EB020403. The Bern research centre was funded by Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 180365). This work was partly undertaken at UCLH/UCL, which received a proportion of funding from the Department of Health’s NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme. The work was also supported by the Epilepsy Society, UK. We are grateful to the Wolfson Trust and the Epilepsy Society for supporting the Epilepsy Society MRI scanner. The UNICAMP research centre was funded by FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation); Contract grant number: 2013/07559-3. Lastly, we are grateful for software development and high-performance computing work performed by UNC Chapel Hill graduate research assistant Kyuyeon Kim. Funding Information: B.C.M. is supported by NINDS R21 NS107739-01A1. M.K.M.A. is supported by FAPESP 15/17066-0. A.B. is supported by CIHR MOP-57840. N.Be. is supported by CIHR MOP-123520; CIHR MOP-130516. B.Ber. acknowledges research support from NSERC (Discovery-1304413), CIHR (FDN-154298), Azrieli Center for Autism Research of the Montreal Neurological Institute (ACAR), SickKids Foundation (NI17-039), and salary support from FRQS (Chercheur Boursier Junior 1). L.C. is supported by Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT 181508, 232676, 251216, and 280283); UNAM-DGAPA (IB201712). O.D. is supported by Finding A Cure for Epilepsy and Seizures (FACES). J.S.D. is supported by NIHR. Funding Information: S.S.K. is supported by Medical Research Council (MR/S00355X/1 and MR/K023152/1) and Epilepsy Research UK (1085). P.K. is supported by S10OD023696; R01EB015611. Funding Information: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: B.Ben. is the cofounder of AIRAmed GmbH, a company that offers brain segmentation. N.K.F. holds Honoraria from Bial, Eisai, Philips/EGI, UCB. D.J.S. has received research grants or consultance honoraria from Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Servier, and Takeda. P.S. received speaker fees from and is on advisory boards for Biomarin, Zogenyx, GW Pharmaceuticals; research funding by ENECTA BV, GW Pharmaceuticals, Kolfarma srl., Eisai. P.M.T. received a research grant from Biogen, Inc., and was a paid consultant for Kairos Venture Capital, Inc., USA, for projects unrelated to this work. M.G. received fees and travel support from Bial Pharmaceutical and Netlé Health Science outside the submitted work. Funding Information: N.K.F. is supported by DFG FO750/5-1. R.Kä. is supported by Saastamoinen Foundation. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Artificial intelligence has recently gained popularity across different medical fields to aid in the detection of diseases based on pathology samples or medical imaging findings. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a key assessment tool for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The role of machine learning and artificial intelligence to increase detection of brain abnormalities in TLE remains inconclusive. We used support vector machine (SV) and deep learning (DL) models based on region of interest (ROI-based) structural (n = 336) and diffusion (n = 863) brain MRI data from patients with TLE with (“lesional”) and without (“non-lesional”) radiographic features suggestive of underlying hippocampal sclerosis from the multinational (multi-center) ENIGMA-Epilepsy consortium. Our data showed that models to identify TLE performed better or similar (68–75%) compared to models to lateralize the side of TLE (56–73%, except structural-based) based on diffusion data with the opposite pattern seen for structural data (67–75% to diagnose vs. 83% to lateralize). In other aspects, structural and diffusion-based models showed similar classification accuracies. Our classification models for patients with hippocampal sclerosis were more accurate (68–76%) than models that stratified non-lesional patients (53–62%). Overall, SV and DL models performed similarly with several instances in which SV mildly outperformed DL. We discuss the relative performance of these models with ROI-level data and the implications for future applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in epilepsy care.
AB - Artificial intelligence has recently gained popularity across different medical fields to aid in the detection of diseases based on pathology samples or medical imaging findings. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a key assessment tool for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The role of machine learning and artificial intelligence to increase detection of brain abnormalities in TLE remains inconclusive. We used support vector machine (SV) and deep learning (DL) models based on region of interest (ROI-based) structural (n = 336) and diffusion (n = 863) brain MRI data from patients with TLE with (“lesional”) and without (“non-lesional”) radiographic features suggestive of underlying hippocampal sclerosis from the multinational (multi-center) ENIGMA-Epilepsy consortium. Our data showed that models to identify TLE performed better or similar (68–75%) compared to models to lateralize the side of TLE (56–73%, except structural-based) based on diffusion data with the opposite pattern seen for structural data (67–75% to diagnose vs. 83% to lateralize). In other aspects, structural and diffusion-based models showed similar classification accuracies. Our classification models for patients with hippocampal sclerosis were more accurate (68–76%) than models that stratified non-lesional patients (53–62%). Overall, SV and DL models performed similarly with several instances in which SV mildly outperformed DL. We discuss the relative performance of these models with ROI-level data and the implications for future applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in epilepsy care.
KW - Artificial inteligence
KW - Epilepsy
KW - Machine learning
KW - Temporal lobe epilepsy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111563148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102765
DO - 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102765
M3 - Article
C2 - 34339947
AN - SCOPUS:85111563148
SN - 2213-1582
VL - 31
JO - NeuroImage: Clinical
JF - NeuroImage: Clinical
M1 - 102765
ER -