Are youth mentoring programs good value-for-money? An evaluation of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Melbourne program

Marjory Moodie; Jane Fisher

doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-41

Are youth mentoring programs good value-for-money? An evaluation of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Melbourne program

Marjory Moodie, Jane Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) program matches vulnerable young people with a trained, supervised adult volunteer as mentor. The young people are typically seriously disadvantaged, with multiple psychosocial problems. Methods Threshold analysis was undertaken to determine whether investment in the program was a worthwhile use of limited public funds. The potential cost savings were based on US estimates of life-time costs associated with high-risk youth who drop out-of-school and become adult criminals. The intervention was modelled for children aged 10a??14 years residing in Melbourne in 2004.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1 - 9
Number of pages	9
Journal	BMC Public Health
Volume	9
Issue number	Art. No: 41
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-41
Publication status	Published - 2009
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1186/1471-2458-9-41

RM sElocation

Cite this

@article{77316c50d8bf4195acfce2b466c20321,

title = "Are youth mentoring programs good value-for-money? An evaluation of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Melbourne program",

abstract = "Background The Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) program matches vulnerable young people with a trained, supervised adult volunteer as mentor. The young people are typically seriously disadvantaged, with multiple psychosocial problems. Methods Threshold analysis was undertaken to determine whether investment in the program was a worthwhile use of limited public funds. The potential cost savings were based on US estimates of life-time costs associated with high-risk youth who drop out-of-school and become adult criminals. The intervention was modelled for children aged 10a??14 years residing in Melbourne in 2004.",

author = "Marjory Moodie and Jane Fisher",

year = "2009",

doi = "10.1186/1471-2458-9-41",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

pages = "1 -- 9",

journal = "BMC Public Health",

issn = "1471-2458",

publisher = "BioMed Central",

number = "Art. No: 41",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are youth mentoring programs good value-for-money? An evaluation of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Melbourne program

AU - Moodie, Marjory

AU - Fisher, Jane

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Background The Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) program matches vulnerable young people with a trained, supervised adult volunteer as mentor. The young people are typically seriously disadvantaged, with multiple psychosocial problems. Methods Threshold analysis was undertaken to determine whether investment in the program was a worthwhile use of limited public funds. The potential cost savings were based on US estimates of life-time costs associated with high-risk youth who drop out-of-school and become adult criminals. The intervention was modelled for children aged 10a??14 years residing in Melbourne in 2004.

AB - Background The Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) program matches vulnerable young people with a trained, supervised adult volunteer as mentor. The young people are typically seriously disadvantaged, with multiple psychosocial problems. Methods Threshold analysis was undertaken to determine whether investment in the program was a worthwhile use of limited public funds. The potential cost savings were based on US estimates of life-time costs associated with high-risk youth who drop out-of-school and become adult criminals. The intervention was modelled for children aged 10a??14 years residing in Melbourne in 2004.

UR - http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2458-9-41.pdf

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-9-41

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-9-41

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - Art. No: 41

ER -