Are we prepared for Ebola and other viral haemorrhagic fevers?

Allen Cheuk-Seng Cheng, Heath Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOther

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As the current Ebola virus outbreak reaches record numbers in West Africa, Australia is developing guidelines and protocols for dealing with suspected cases. We ask two important questions. Could a centralised approach to this process improve our response? And, would not the best preparation for Australia and other developed countries be to provide both resources and expertise to affected countries, applying the principle of enlightened self-interest? There has been significant experience in dealing with outbreaks of Ebola virus since the initial description of the virus and the first two outbreaks in 1976, although several features of the current outbreak are unusual. Prior to this outbreak, 2,387 cases had been reported in 28 separate outbreaks, with a case fatality risk (CFR) of 66.7 .1. Of the five species of Ebola virus, three (Zaire, Sudan and Bundibugyo) have been associated with significant human to human transmission, with the other two (Tai Forest and Reston) associated with limited or no human disease. The current outbreak has been caused by a new emergence of the Zaire species.2 Several factors have contributed to this outbreak being the largest described. By early September 2014, cases had been reported in multiple regions in five countries and for the first time involved large urban centres. Even before the dramatic spread of late August and early September, the World Health Organization (WHO) had designated this outbreak as a public health emergency of international concern.3 This designation has been used twice previously for the 2009 influenza H1N1 (Swine Flu) pandemic and the 2014 resurgence of polio. It has legal implications, invoking measures for disease prevention, surveillance, control and response under the 2005 International Health Regulations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403 - 404
Number of pages2
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

Cheng, Allen Cheuk-Seng ; Kelly, Heath. / Are we prepared for Ebola and other viral haemorrhagic fevers?. In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2014 ; Vol. 38, No. 5. pp. 403 - 404.
@article{aab216df5f2248b4940b8d9a42f25e23,
title = "Are we prepared for Ebola and other viral haemorrhagic fevers?",
abstract = "As the current Ebola virus outbreak reaches record numbers in West Africa, Australia is developing guidelines and protocols for dealing with suspected cases. We ask two important questions. Could a centralised approach to this process improve our response? And, would not the best preparation for Australia and other developed countries be to provide both resources and expertise to affected countries, applying the principle of enlightened self-interest? There has been significant experience in dealing with outbreaks of Ebola virus since the initial description of the virus and the first two outbreaks in 1976, although several features of the current outbreak are unusual. Prior to this outbreak, 2,387 cases had been reported in 28 separate outbreaks, with a case fatality risk (CFR) of 66.7 .1. Of the five species of Ebola virus, three (Zaire, Sudan and Bundibugyo) have been associated with significant human to human transmission, with the other two (Tai Forest and Reston) associated with limited or no human disease. The current outbreak has been caused by a new emergence of the Zaire species.2 Several factors have contributed to this outbreak being the largest described. By early September 2014, cases had been reported in multiple regions in five countries and for the first time involved large urban centres. Even before the dramatic spread of late August and early September, the World Health Organization (WHO) had designated this outbreak as a public health emergency of international concern.3 This designation has been used twice previously for the 2009 influenza H1N1 (Swine Flu) pandemic and the 2014 resurgence of polio. It has legal implications, invoking measures for disease prevention, surveillance, control and response under the 2005 International Health Regulations.",
author = "Cheng, {Allen Cheuk-Seng} and Heath Kelly",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/1753-6405.12303",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "403 -- 404",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1753-6405",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Are we prepared for Ebola and other viral haemorrhagic fevers? / Cheng, Allen Cheuk-Seng; Kelly, Heath.

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2014, p. 403 - 404.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterOther

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are we prepared for Ebola and other viral haemorrhagic fevers?

AU - Cheng, Allen Cheuk-Seng

AU - Kelly, Heath

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - As the current Ebola virus outbreak reaches record numbers in West Africa, Australia is developing guidelines and protocols for dealing with suspected cases. We ask two important questions. Could a centralised approach to this process improve our response? And, would not the best preparation for Australia and other developed countries be to provide both resources and expertise to affected countries, applying the principle of enlightened self-interest? There has been significant experience in dealing with outbreaks of Ebola virus since the initial description of the virus and the first two outbreaks in 1976, although several features of the current outbreak are unusual. Prior to this outbreak, 2,387 cases had been reported in 28 separate outbreaks, with a case fatality risk (CFR) of 66.7 .1. Of the five species of Ebola virus, three (Zaire, Sudan and Bundibugyo) have been associated with significant human to human transmission, with the other two (Tai Forest and Reston) associated with limited or no human disease. The current outbreak has been caused by a new emergence of the Zaire species.2 Several factors have contributed to this outbreak being the largest described. By early September 2014, cases had been reported in multiple regions in five countries and for the first time involved large urban centres. Even before the dramatic spread of late August and early September, the World Health Organization (WHO) had designated this outbreak as a public health emergency of international concern.3 This designation has been used twice previously for the 2009 influenza H1N1 (Swine Flu) pandemic and the 2014 resurgence of polio. It has legal implications, invoking measures for disease prevention, surveillance, control and response under the 2005 International Health Regulations.

AB - As the current Ebola virus outbreak reaches record numbers in West Africa, Australia is developing guidelines and protocols for dealing with suspected cases. We ask two important questions. Could a centralised approach to this process improve our response? And, would not the best preparation for Australia and other developed countries be to provide both resources and expertise to affected countries, applying the principle of enlightened self-interest? There has been significant experience in dealing with outbreaks of Ebola virus since the initial description of the virus and the first two outbreaks in 1976, although several features of the current outbreak are unusual. Prior to this outbreak, 2,387 cases had been reported in 28 separate outbreaks, with a case fatality risk (CFR) of 66.7 .1. Of the five species of Ebola virus, three (Zaire, Sudan and Bundibugyo) have been associated with significant human to human transmission, with the other two (Tai Forest and Reston) associated with limited or no human disease. The current outbreak has been caused by a new emergence of the Zaire species.2 Several factors have contributed to this outbreak being the largest described. By early September 2014, cases had been reported in multiple regions in five countries and for the first time involved large urban centres. Even before the dramatic spread of late August and early September, the World Health Organization (WHO) had designated this outbreak as a public health emergency of international concern.3 This designation has been used twice previously for the 2009 influenza H1N1 (Swine Flu) pandemic and the 2014 resurgence of polio. It has legal implications, invoking measures for disease prevention, surveillance, control and response under the 2005 International Health Regulations.

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1753-6405.12303/pdf

U2 - 10.1111/1753-6405.12303

DO - 10.1111/1753-6405.12303

M3 - Letter

VL - 38

SP - 403

EP - 404

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

SN - 1753-6405

IS - 5

ER -