Are We Objective? A Study into the Effectiveness of Risk Measurement in the Water Industry

Anna Kosovac, Brian Davidson, Hector Malano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A survey of 77 water practitioners within Melbourne, Australia, highlighted the lack of objectiveness within current risk scoring processes. Each water authority adopted similar processes, all of which adhere to the ISO31000 standard on Risk Management, and these were tested within this study to determine the “objective” nature of technical risk assessments such as these. The outcome of the study indicated that current risk measurement approaches cannot be seen as objective. This is due to the high variation in risk scores between individuals, which indicates a level of subjectivity. The study confirms previous research that has been undertaken in assessing the effectiveness of risk matrices. This research is novel in its testing of the water sector’s risk measuring practices and may be of value to other industries that utilize similar risk approaches. This research posits whether this subjectivity is due to inherent bias of either a psychological or cultural risk nature that could produce the varied scores.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
JournalSustainability
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • risk assessment
  • water
  • decision-making

Cite this

Kosovac, Anna ; Davidson, Brian ; Malano, Hector. / Are We Objective? A Study into the Effectiveness of Risk Measurement in the Water Industry. In: Sustainability. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 5.
@article{05453022a03848bcb079b35c5898e0cb,
title = "Are We Objective? A Study into the Effectiveness of Risk Measurement in the Water Industry",
abstract = "A survey of 77 water practitioners within Melbourne, Australia, highlighted the lack of objectiveness within current risk scoring processes. Each water authority adopted similar processes, all of which adhere to the ISO31000 standard on Risk Management, and these were tested within this study to determine the “objective” nature of technical risk assessments such as these. The outcome of the study indicated that current risk measurement approaches cannot be seen as objective. This is due to the high variation in risk scores between individuals, which indicates a level of subjectivity. The study confirms previous research that has been undertaken in assessing the effectiveness of risk matrices. This research is novel in its testing of the water sector’s risk measuring practices and may be of value to other industries that utilize similar risk approaches. This research posits whether this subjectivity is due to inherent bias of either a psychological or cultural risk nature that could produce the varied scores.",
keywords = "risk assessment, water, decision-making",
author = "Anna Kosovac and Brian Davidson and Hector Malano",
year = "2019",
doi = "/10.3390/su11051279",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "5",

}

Are We Objective? A Study into the Effectiveness of Risk Measurement in the Water Industry. / Kosovac, Anna; Davidson, Brian; Malano, Hector.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are We Objective? A Study into the Effectiveness of Risk Measurement in the Water Industry

AU - Kosovac, Anna

AU - Davidson, Brian

AU - Malano, Hector

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - A survey of 77 water practitioners within Melbourne, Australia, highlighted the lack of objectiveness within current risk scoring processes. Each water authority adopted similar processes, all of which adhere to the ISO31000 standard on Risk Management, and these were tested within this study to determine the “objective” nature of technical risk assessments such as these. The outcome of the study indicated that current risk measurement approaches cannot be seen as objective. This is due to the high variation in risk scores between individuals, which indicates a level of subjectivity. The study confirms previous research that has been undertaken in assessing the effectiveness of risk matrices. This research is novel in its testing of the water sector’s risk measuring practices and may be of value to other industries that utilize similar risk approaches. This research posits whether this subjectivity is due to inherent bias of either a psychological or cultural risk nature that could produce the varied scores.

AB - A survey of 77 water practitioners within Melbourne, Australia, highlighted the lack of objectiveness within current risk scoring processes. Each water authority adopted similar processes, all of which adhere to the ISO31000 standard on Risk Management, and these were tested within this study to determine the “objective” nature of technical risk assessments such as these. The outcome of the study indicated that current risk measurement approaches cannot be seen as objective. This is due to the high variation in risk scores between individuals, which indicates a level of subjectivity. The study confirms previous research that has been undertaken in assessing the effectiveness of risk matrices. This research is novel in its testing of the water sector’s risk measuring practices and may be of value to other industries that utilize similar risk approaches. This research posits whether this subjectivity is due to inherent bias of either a psychological or cultural risk nature that could produce the varied scores.

KW - risk assessment

KW - water

KW - decision-making

U2 - /10.3390/su11051279

DO - /10.3390/su11051279

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 5

ER -