Are patient responses to sensitive sexual health questions influenced by the sex of the practitioner?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a patient's responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour are influenced by the sex of their treating practitioner. Methods: An audit was conducted on the computerised medical records of all patients attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre through the walk-in triage system between January 2003 and July 2005. Patient responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour were analysed according to patient group (based upon the sex of their sexual partners) and the sex of the treating practitioner. Results: There was no significant difference in the reported number of sexual partners, condom use, sex overseas, injecting drug use, or commercial sex work based on the sex of the treating practitioner for the different patient groups. This held true whether clients were homosexual men (n = 1609, p>0.07), heterosexual men (n=4847, p>0.11), or women (n = 4910, p>0.08). Conclusions: The sex of the practitioner did not significantly influence patient responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-322
Number of pages2
JournalSexually Transmitted Infections
Volume82
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2006

Cite this

@article{585de3ac50654210b02f1e223b9cac96,
title = "Are patient responses to sensitive sexual health questions influenced by the sex of the practitioner?",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether a patient's responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour are influenced by the sex of their treating practitioner. Methods: An audit was conducted on the computerised medical records of all patients attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre through the walk-in triage system between January 2003 and July 2005. Patient responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour were analysed according to patient group (based upon the sex of their sexual partners) and the sex of the treating practitioner. Results: There was no significant difference in the reported number of sexual partners, condom use, sex overseas, injecting drug use, or commercial sex work based on the sex of the treating practitioner for the different patient groups. This held true whether clients were homosexual men (n = 1609, p>0.07), heterosexual men (n=4847, p>0.11), or women (n = 4910, p>0.08). Conclusions: The sex of the practitioner did not significantly influence patient responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour.",
author = "S. Ginige and Chen, {M. Y.} and Fairley, {Christopher K.}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/sti.2005.018069",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "321--322",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Infections",
issn = "1368-4973",
publisher = "BMJ Group",
number = "4",

}

Are patient responses to sensitive sexual health questions influenced by the sex of the practitioner? / Ginige, S.; Chen, M. Y.; Fairley, Christopher K.

In: Sexually Transmitted Infections, Vol. 82, No. 4, 01.08.2006, p. 321-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are patient responses to sensitive sexual health questions influenced by the sex of the practitioner?

AU - Ginige, S.

AU - Chen, M. Y.

AU - Fairley, Christopher K.

PY - 2006/8/1

Y1 - 2006/8/1

N2 - Objective: To determine whether a patient's responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour are influenced by the sex of their treating practitioner. Methods: An audit was conducted on the computerised medical records of all patients attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre through the walk-in triage system between January 2003 and July 2005. Patient responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour were analysed according to patient group (based upon the sex of their sexual partners) and the sex of the treating practitioner. Results: There was no significant difference in the reported number of sexual partners, condom use, sex overseas, injecting drug use, or commercial sex work based on the sex of the treating practitioner for the different patient groups. This held true whether clients were homosexual men (n = 1609, p>0.07), heterosexual men (n=4847, p>0.11), or women (n = 4910, p>0.08). Conclusions: The sex of the practitioner did not significantly influence patient responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour.

AB - Objective: To determine whether a patient's responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour are influenced by the sex of their treating practitioner. Methods: An audit was conducted on the computerised medical records of all patients attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre through the walk-in triage system between January 2003 and July 2005. Patient responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour were analysed according to patient group (based upon the sex of their sexual partners) and the sex of the treating practitioner. Results: There was no significant difference in the reported number of sexual partners, condom use, sex overseas, injecting drug use, or commercial sex work based on the sex of the treating practitioner for the different patient groups. This held true whether clients were homosexual men (n = 1609, p>0.07), heterosexual men (n=4847, p>0.11), or women (n = 4910, p>0.08). Conclusions: The sex of the practitioner did not significantly influence patient responses to sensitive questions about their sexual behaviour.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747195626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/sti.2005.018069

DO - 10.1136/sti.2005.018069

M3 - Article

C2 - 16877584

AN - SCOPUS:33747195626

VL - 82

SP - 321

EP - 322

JO - Sexually Transmitted Infections

JF - Sexually Transmitted Infections

SN - 1368-4973

IS - 4

ER -