Appropriateness of adult plain abdominal radiograph requesting in a regional Emergency Department

Michelle Fernandez, Simon Craig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Although commonly ordered, abdominal x-rays are thought to be overused and unhelpful in many emergency department patients. Our objectives were to evaluate the appropriateness of plain abdominal X-ray (AXR) requests in adult patients presenting to a Victorian regional emergency department (ED). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all adult patients with a plain AXR requested by ED medical staff members in a regional healthcare centre in Victoria, Australia in 2016. Patient demographics, ED disposition and any further imaging results were extracted from the medical record. Indications for X-ray and clinician seniority were determined from the radiology request slips signed by the treating emergency doctor. Appropriateness of imaging was determined by comparing the indication for abdominal radiograph to local evidence-based guidelines. Results: One hundred and nine episodes of plain AXR requests met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 40 were considered inappropriate according to clinical guidelines. Overall, 36% (39/109) had normal or non-specific findings and 42% (46/109) demonstrated faecal loading, while 22% (24/109) identified pathology. Thirty-three patients had further imaging, mostly with computed tomography (CT). Junior staff members were responsible for most of the AXR requests. Conclusion: In our regional hospital ED, over one third of AXRs requested for adult patients were inappropriate according to clinical guidelines. AXRs have a low diagnostic yield and frequently do not reduce the need for further imaging. The use of a clinical practice guideline and education of junior medical staff may increase the appropriate use of plain AXRs in the regional ED setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-182
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
Volume63
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • abdominal X-ray
  • emergency department
  • guideline

Cite this

@article{7cbb0ba1c03b4615b8d1eb05f520ae0d,
title = "Appropriateness of adult plain abdominal radiograph requesting in a regional Emergency Department",
abstract = "Introduction: Although commonly ordered, abdominal x-rays are thought to be overused and unhelpful in many emergency department patients. Our objectives were to evaluate the appropriateness of plain abdominal X-ray (AXR) requests in adult patients presenting to a Victorian regional emergency department (ED). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all adult patients with a plain AXR requested by ED medical staff members in a regional healthcare centre in Victoria, Australia in 2016. Patient demographics, ED disposition and any further imaging results were extracted from the medical record. Indications for X-ray and clinician seniority were determined from the radiology request slips signed by the treating emergency doctor. Appropriateness of imaging was determined by comparing the indication for abdominal radiograph to local evidence-based guidelines. Results: One hundred and nine episodes of plain AXR requests met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 40 were considered inappropriate according to clinical guidelines. Overall, 36{\%} (39/109) had normal or non-specific findings and 42{\%} (46/109) demonstrated faecal loading, while 22{\%} (24/109) identified pathology. Thirty-three patients had further imaging, mostly with computed tomography (CT). Junior staff members were responsible for most of the AXR requests. Conclusion: In our regional hospital ED, over one third of AXRs requested for adult patients were inappropriate according to clinical guidelines. AXRs have a low diagnostic yield and frequently do not reduce the need for further imaging. The use of a clinical practice guideline and education of junior medical staff may increase the appropriate use of plain AXRs in the regional ED setting.",
keywords = "abdominal X-ray, emergency department, guideline",
author = "Michelle Fernandez and Simon Craig",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1754-9485.12847",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "175--182",
journal = "Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology",
issn = "1754-9477",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Appropriateness of adult plain abdominal radiograph requesting in a regional Emergency Department. / Fernandez, Michelle; Craig, Simon.

In: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, Vol. 63, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 175-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appropriateness of adult plain abdominal radiograph requesting in a regional Emergency Department

AU - Fernandez, Michelle

AU - Craig, Simon

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Introduction: Although commonly ordered, abdominal x-rays are thought to be overused and unhelpful in many emergency department patients. Our objectives were to evaluate the appropriateness of plain abdominal X-ray (AXR) requests in adult patients presenting to a Victorian regional emergency department (ED). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all adult patients with a plain AXR requested by ED medical staff members in a regional healthcare centre in Victoria, Australia in 2016. Patient demographics, ED disposition and any further imaging results were extracted from the medical record. Indications for X-ray and clinician seniority were determined from the radiology request slips signed by the treating emergency doctor. Appropriateness of imaging was determined by comparing the indication for abdominal radiograph to local evidence-based guidelines. Results: One hundred and nine episodes of plain AXR requests met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 40 were considered inappropriate according to clinical guidelines. Overall, 36% (39/109) had normal or non-specific findings and 42% (46/109) demonstrated faecal loading, while 22% (24/109) identified pathology. Thirty-three patients had further imaging, mostly with computed tomography (CT). Junior staff members were responsible for most of the AXR requests. Conclusion: In our regional hospital ED, over one third of AXRs requested for adult patients were inappropriate according to clinical guidelines. AXRs have a low diagnostic yield and frequently do not reduce the need for further imaging. The use of a clinical practice guideline and education of junior medical staff may increase the appropriate use of plain AXRs in the regional ED setting.

AB - Introduction: Although commonly ordered, abdominal x-rays are thought to be overused and unhelpful in many emergency department patients. Our objectives were to evaluate the appropriateness of plain abdominal X-ray (AXR) requests in adult patients presenting to a Victorian regional emergency department (ED). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all adult patients with a plain AXR requested by ED medical staff members in a regional healthcare centre in Victoria, Australia in 2016. Patient demographics, ED disposition and any further imaging results were extracted from the medical record. Indications for X-ray and clinician seniority were determined from the radiology request slips signed by the treating emergency doctor. Appropriateness of imaging was determined by comparing the indication for abdominal radiograph to local evidence-based guidelines. Results: One hundred and nine episodes of plain AXR requests met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 40 were considered inappropriate according to clinical guidelines. Overall, 36% (39/109) had normal or non-specific findings and 42% (46/109) demonstrated faecal loading, while 22% (24/109) identified pathology. Thirty-three patients had further imaging, mostly with computed tomography (CT). Junior staff members were responsible for most of the AXR requests. Conclusion: In our regional hospital ED, over one third of AXRs requested for adult patients were inappropriate according to clinical guidelines. AXRs have a low diagnostic yield and frequently do not reduce the need for further imaging. The use of a clinical practice guideline and education of junior medical staff may increase the appropriate use of plain AXRs in the regional ED setting.

KW - abdominal X-ray

KW - emergency department

KW - guideline

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059837291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1754-9485.12847

DO - 10.1111/1754-9485.12847

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 175

EP - 182

JO - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

JF - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

SN - 1754-9477

IS - 2

ER -