Application of Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation Framework to the Development of Polycycstic Ovary Syndrome Guideline: A Case Study on Implementation

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleOtherpeer-review

Abstract

Implementation of healthcare guidelines, a set of recommendations aiming to optimize patient care, can be a complex process which is at risk of poor translation into practice. Failure to adopt new evidence-based healthcare findings can contribute to a large variation in care, potentially affecting outcomes for service users. Designed to avoid this issue, the Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI) knowledge translation framework was created to support the development and future implementation of clinical practice guidelines. The framework is distinguished by a focus on methodological rigor, stakeholder engagement, and partnership, leading to the coproduction of a guideline and research projects. In this article, we use the development of the International Evidence-based Guideline on the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (2018) as a case study to articulate the MCHRI knowledge translation framework. Specifically, this article discusses stakeholder engagement; development and codesign of evidence-based recommendations; implementation and knowledge generation; dissemination, translation, and scale up; and refinement/learning from evaluation. This case study demonstrates how hybrid frameworks, models, and theories for implementation, such as the MCHRI implementation framework, have their place in healthcare. The underlying principle that informs the framework is stakeholder engagement, including codesign, empowerment, and partnership.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-18
Number of pages6
JournalSeminars in Reproductive Medicine
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Guideline uptake
  • Implementation model
  • Translation

Cite this

@article{e4e8f8fef628481bae4677550c7db8c8,
title = "Application of Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation Framework to the Development of Polycycstic Ovary Syndrome Guideline: A Case Study on Implementation",
abstract = "Implementation of healthcare guidelines, a set of recommendations aiming to optimize patient care, can be a complex process which is at risk of poor translation into practice. Failure to adopt new evidence-based healthcare findings can contribute to a large variation in care, potentially affecting outcomes for service users. Designed to avoid this issue, the Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI) knowledge translation framework was created to support the development and future implementation of clinical practice guidelines. The framework is distinguished by a focus on methodological rigor, stakeholder engagement, and partnership, leading to the coproduction of a guideline and research projects. In this article, we use the development of the International Evidence-based Guideline on the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (2018) as a case study to articulate the MCHRI knowledge translation framework. Specifically, this article discusses stakeholder engagement; development and codesign of evidence-based recommendations; implementation and knowledge generation; dissemination, translation, and scale up; and refinement/learning from evaluation. This case study demonstrates how hybrid frameworks, models, and theories for implementation, such as the MCHRI implementation framework, have their place in healthcare. The underlying principle that informs the framework is stakeholder engagement, including codesign, empowerment, and partnership.",
keywords = "Guideline uptake, Implementation model, Translation",
author = "Tracy Robinson and Helen Skouteris and Angela Melder and Cate Bailey and Heather Morris and Rhonda Garad and Teede, {Helena J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0038-1667311",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "13--18",
journal = "Seminars in Reproductive Medicine",
issn = "1526-8004",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation Framework to the Development of Polycycstic Ovary Syndrome Guideline

T2 - A Case Study on Implementation

AU - Robinson, Tracy

AU - Skouteris, Helen

AU - Melder, Angela

AU - Bailey, Cate

AU - Morris, Heather

AU - Garad, Rhonda

AU - Teede, Helena J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Implementation of healthcare guidelines, a set of recommendations aiming to optimize patient care, can be a complex process which is at risk of poor translation into practice. Failure to adopt new evidence-based healthcare findings can contribute to a large variation in care, potentially affecting outcomes for service users. Designed to avoid this issue, the Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI) knowledge translation framework was created to support the development and future implementation of clinical practice guidelines. The framework is distinguished by a focus on methodological rigor, stakeholder engagement, and partnership, leading to the coproduction of a guideline and research projects. In this article, we use the development of the International Evidence-based Guideline on the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (2018) as a case study to articulate the MCHRI knowledge translation framework. Specifically, this article discusses stakeholder engagement; development and codesign of evidence-based recommendations; implementation and knowledge generation; dissemination, translation, and scale up; and refinement/learning from evaluation. This case study demonstrates how hybrid frameworks, models, and theories for implementation, such as the MCHRI implementation framework, have their place in healthcare. The underlying principle that informs the framework is stakeholder engagement, including codesign, empowerment, and partnership.

AB - Implementation of healthcare guidelines, a set of recommendations aiming to optimize patient care, can be a complex process which is at risk of poor translation into practice. Failure to adopt new evidence-based healthcare findings can contribute to a large variation in care, potentially affecting outcomes for service users. Designed to avoid this issue, the Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI) knowledge translation framework was created to support the development and future implementation of clinical practice guidelines. The framework is distinguished by a focus on methodological rigor, stakeholder engagement, and partnership, leading to the coproduction of a guideline and research projects. In this article, we use the development of the International Evidence-based Guideline on the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (2018) as a case study to articulate the MCHRI knowledge translation framework. Specifically, this article discusses stakeholder engagement; development and codesign of evidence-based recommendations; implementation and knowledge generation; dissemination, translation, and scale up; and refinement/learning from evaluation. This case study demonstrates how hybrid frameworks, models, and theories for implementation, such as the MCHRI implementation framework, have their place in healthcare. The underlying principle that informs the framework is stakeholder engagement, including codesign, empowerment, and partnership.

KW - Guideline uptake

KW - Implementation model

KW - Translation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053279332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0038-1667311

DO - 10.1055/s-0038-1667311

M3 - Review Article

VL - 36

SP - 13

EP - 18

JO - Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

JF - Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

SN - 1526-8004

IS - 1

ER -