TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of artificial intelligence methods to model the effect of grass curing level on spread rate of fires
AU - Khanmohammadi, Sadegh
AU - Cruz, Miguel G.
AU - Mohammadi Golafshani, Emadaldin
AU - Bai, Yu
AU - Arashpour, Mehrdad
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful for support from the fellow lab members.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Artificial intelligence (AI) enables new approaches to fire behaviour models of operational relevance, including prescribed burns. This is particularly important in modelling of processes that are poorly understood, such as live fuel's effect on fire propagation. The objective of this study was to apply AI algorithms to quantify the effect of the proportion of dead fuels in a senescing grassland, the curing level, on reducing the rate of fire spread relative to the fully cured condition. We applied three different machine learning (ML) models, regression trees, support vector regression (SVR) and Gene expression programming (GEP), two ensemble ML methods, Random Forest and GEP Forest, and non-linear regression analysis to an experimental fire dataset. Results show SVR and GEP as the best ML methods to model the curing level impact on fire spread. No differences in model fit were observed between the best ML methods and non-linear regression analysis.
AB - Artificial intelligence (AI) enables new approaches to fire behaviour models of operational relevance, including prescribed burns. This is particularly important in modelling of processes that are poorly understood, such as live fuel's effect on fire propagation. The objective of this study was to apply AI algorithms to quantify the effect of the proportion of dead fuels in a senescing grassland, the curing level, on reducing the rate of fire spread relative to the fully cured condition. We applied three different machine learning (ML) models, regression trees, support vector regression (SVR) and Gene expression programming (GEP), two ensemble ML methods, Random Forest and GEP Forest, and non-linear regression analysis to an experimental fire dataset. Results show SVR and GEP as the best ML methods to model the curing level impact on fire spread. No differences in model fit were observed between the best ML methods and non-linear regression analysis.
KW - Bushfire
KW - Feature importance
KW - Gene expression programming
KW - Grasslands
KW - Machine learning
KW - Remote regions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181901499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105930
DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105930
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85181901499
SN - 1364-8152
VL - 173
JO - Environmental Modelling and Software
JF - Environmental Modelling and Software
M1 - 105930
ER -