Animal models in neonatal resuscitation research

What can they teach us?

Stuart B. Hooper, Arjan B. te Pas, Graeme R. Polglase, Myra Wyckoff

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleOtherpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Animal models have made and continue to make important contributions to neonatal medicine. For example, studies in fetal sheep have taught us much about the physiology of the fetal-to-neonatal transition. However, whereas animal models allow multiple factors to be investigated in a logical and systematic manner, no animal model is perfect for humans and so we need to understand the fundamental differences in physiology between the species in question and humans. Although most physiological systems are well conserved between species, some small differences exist and so wherever possible the knowledge generated from preclinical studies in animals should be tested in clinical trials. However, with the rise of evidence-based medicine the distinction between scientific knowledge generation and evidence gathering has been confused and the two have been lumped together. This misunderstands the contribution that scientific knowledge can provide. Science should be used to guide the gathering of evidence by informing the design of clinical trials, thereby increasing their likelihood of success. While scientific knowledge is not evidence, in the absence of evidence it is likely to be the best option for guiding clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)300-305
Number of pages6
JournalSeminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Animal models
  • Fetal-to-neonatal transition
  • Pigs
  • Rabbits
  • Rodents
  • Sheep

Cite this

@article{c16a90630a474df083d32365491c9e95,
title = "Animal models in neonatal resuscitation research: What can they teach us?",
abstract = "Animal models have made and continue to make important contributions to neonatal medicine. For example, studies in fetal sheep have taught us much about the physiology of the fetal-to-neonatal transition. However, whereas animal models allow multiple factors to be investigated in a logical and systematic manner, no animal model is perfect for humans and so we need to understand the fundamental differences in physiology between the species in question and humans. Although most physiological systems are well conserved between species, some small differences exist and so wherever possible the knowledge generated from preclinical studies in animals should be tested in clinical trials. However, with the rise of evidence-based medicine the distinction between scientific knowledge generation and evidence gathering has been confused and the two have been lumped together. This misunderstands the contribution that scientific knowledge can provide. Science should be used to guide the gathering of evidence by informing the design of clinical trials, thereby increasing their likelihood of success. While scientific knowledge is not evidence, in the absence of evidence it is likely to be the best option for guiding clinical practice.",
keywords = "Animal models, Fetal-to-neonatal transition, Pigs, Rabbits, Rodents, Sheep",
author = "Hooper, {Stuart B.} and {te Pas}, {Arjan B.} and Polglase, {Graeme R.} and Myra Wyckoff",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.siny.2018.07.002",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "300--305",
journal = "Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1744-165X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

Animal models in neonatal resuscitation research : What can they teach us? / Hooper, Stuart B.; te Pas, Arjan B.; Polglase, Graeme R.; Wyckoff, Myra.

In: Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.10.2018, p. 300-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Animal models in neonatal resuscitation research

T2 - What can they teach us?

AU - Hooper, Stuart B.

AU - te Pas, Arjan B.

AU - Polglase, Graeme R.

AU - Wyckoff, Myra

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Animal models have made and continue to make important contributions to neonatal medicine. For example, studies in fetal sheep have taught us much about the physiology of the fetal-to-neonatal transition. However, whereas animal models allow multiple factors to be investigated in a logical and systematic manner, no animal model is perfect for humans and so we need to understand the fundamental differences in physiology between the species in question and humans. Although most physiological systems are well conserved between species, some small differences exist and so wherever possible the knowledge generated from preclinical studies in animals should be tested in clinical trials. However, with the rise of evidence-based medicine the distinction between scientific knowledge generation and evidence gathering has been confused and the two have been lumped together. This misunderstands the contribution that scientific knowledge can provide. Science should be used to guide the gathering of evidence by informing the design of clinical trials, thereby increasing their likelihood of success. While scientific knowledge is not evidence, in the absence of evidence it is likely to be the best option for guiding clinical practice.

AB - Animal models have made and continue to make important contributions to neonatal medicine. For example, studies in fetal sheep have taught us much about the physiology of the fetal-to-neonatal transition. However, whereas animal models allow multiple factors to be investigated in a logical and systematic manner, no animal model is perfect for humans and so we need to understand the fundamental differences in physiology between the species in question and humans. Although most physiological systems are well conserved between species, some small differences exist and so wherever possible the knowledge generated from preclinical studies in animals should be tested in clinical trials. However, with the rise of evidence-based medicine the distinction between scientific knowledge generation and evidence gathering has been confused and the two have been lumped together. This misunderstands the contribution that scientific knowledge can provide. Science should be used to guide the gathering of evidence by informing the design of clinical trials, thereby increasing their likelihood of success. While scientific knowledge is not evidence, in the absence of evidence it is likely to be the best option for guiding clinical practice.

KW - Animal models

KW - Fetal-to-neonatal transition

KW - Pigs

KW - Rabbits

KW - Rodents

KW - Sheep

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049534503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.siny.2018.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.siny.2018.07.002

M3 - Review Article

VL - 23

SP - 300

EP - 305

JO - Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1744-165X

IS - 5

ER -