Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up

Robert D. Herbert, Jessica Kasza, Kari Bo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleOtherpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Randomised trials with long-term follow-up can provide estimates of the long-term effects of health interventions. However, analysis of long-term outcomes in randomised trials may be complicated by problems with the administration of treatment such as non-adherence, treatment switching and co-intervention, and problems obtaining outcome measurements arising from loss to follow-up and death of participants. Methods for dealing with these issues that involve conditioning on post-randomisation variables are unsatisfactory because they may involve the comparison of non-exchangeable groups and generate estimates that do not have a valid causal interpretation. We describe approaches to analysis that potentially provide estimates of causal effects when such issues arise. Brief descriptions are provided of the use of instrumental variable and propensity score methods in trials with imperfect adherence, marginal structural models and g-estimation in trials with treatment switching, mixed longitudinal models and multiple imputation in trials with loss to follow-up, and a sensitivity analysis that can be used when trial follow-up is truncated by death or other events. Clinical trialists might consider these methods both at the design and analysis stages of randomised trials with long-term follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Article number48
Number of pages9
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 May 2018

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Co-intervention
  • Long-term follow-up
  • Loss to follow-up
  • Non-compliance
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Treatment switching

Cite this

@article{808e8c32a06f43ee88efc9db1d85ece3,
title = "Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up",
abstract = "Randomised trials with long-term follow-up can provide estimates of the long-term effects of health interventions. However, analysis of long-term outcomes in randomised trials may be complicated by problems with the administration of treatment such as non-adherence, treatment switching and co-intervention, and problems obtaining outcome measurements arising from loss to follow-up and death of participants. Methods for dealing with these issues that involve conditioning on post-randomisation variables are unsatisfactory because they may involve the comparison of non-exchangeable groups and generate estimates that do not have a valid causal interpretation. We describe approaches to analysis that potentially provide estimates of causal effects when such issues arise. Brief descriptions are provided of the use of instrumental variable and propensity score methods in trials with imperfect adherence, marginal structural models and g-estimation in trials with treatment switching, mixed longitudinal models and multiple imputation in trials with loss to follow-up, and a sensitivity analysis that can be used when trial follow-up is truncated by death or other events. Clinical trialists might consider these methods both at the design and analysis stages of randomised trials with long-term follow-up.",
keywords = "Clinical trials, Co-intervention, Long-term follow-up, Loss to follow-up, Non-compliance, Randomized controlled trials, Treatment switching",
author = "Herbert, {Robert D.} and Jessica Kasza and Kari Bo",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/s12874-018-0499-5",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "BMC Medical Research Methodology",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up. / Herbert, Robert D.; Kasza, Jessica; Bo, Kari.

In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 48, 29.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up

AU - Herbert, Robert D.

AU - Kasza, Jessica

AU - Bo, Kari

PY - 2018/5/29

Y1 - 2018/5/29

N2 - Randomised trials with long-term follow-up can provide estimates of the long-term effects of health interventions. However, analysis of long-term outcomes in randomised trials may be complicated by problems with the administration of treatment such as non-adherence, treatment switching and co-intervention, and problems obtaining outcome measurements arising from loss to follow-up and death of participants. Methods for dealing with these issues that involve conditioning on post-randomisation variables are unsatisfactory because they may involve the comparison of non-exchangeable groups and generate estimates that do not have a valid causal interpretation. We describe approaches to analysis that potentially provide estimates of causal effects when such issues arise. Brief descriptions are provided of the use of instrumental variable and propensity score methods in trials with imperfect adherence, marginal structural models and g-estimation in trials with treatment switching, mixed longitudinal models and multiple imputation in trials with loss to follow-up, and a sensitivity analysis that can be used when trial follow-up is truncated by death or other events. Clinical trialists might consider these methods both at the design and analysis stages of randomised trials with long-term follow-up.

AB - Randomised trials with long-term follow-up can provide estimates of the long-term effects of health interventions. However, analysis of long-term outcomes in randomised trials may be complicated by problems with the administration of treatment such as non-adherence, treatment switching and co-intervention, and problems obtaining outcome measurements arising from loss to follow-up and death of participants. Methods for dealing with these issues that involve conditioning on post-randomisation variables are unsatisfactory because they may involve the comparison of non-exchangeable groups and generate estimates that do not have a valid causal interpretation. We describe approaches to analysis that potentially provide estimates of causal effects when such issues arise. Brief descriptions are provided of the use of instrumental variable and propensity score methods in trials with imperfect adherence, marginal structural models and g-estimation in trials with treatment switching, mixed longitudinal models and multiple imputation in trials with loss to follow-up, and a sensitivity analysis that can be used when trial follow-up is truncated by death or other events. Clinical trialists might consider these methods both at the design and analysis stages of randomised trials with long-term follow-up.

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Co-intervention

KW - Long-term follow-up

KW - Loss to follow-up

KW - Non-compliance

KW - Randomized controlled trials

KW - Treatment switching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047739739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12874-018-0499-5

DO - 10.1186/s12874-018-0499-5

M3 - Review Article

VL - 18

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

IS - 1

M1 - 48

ER -