An introduction to the Emergency Department Adult Clinical Escalation protocol: ED-ACE

Eoin Coughlan, Una Geary, Abel Wakai, Ronan O'Sullivan, John Browne, Eilish McAuliffe, Marie Ward, Fiona McDaid, Conor Deasy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of the study This study demonstrates how a participatory action research approach was used to address the challenge of the early and effective detection of the deteriorating patient in the ED setting. The approach enabled a systematic approach to patient monitoring and escalation of care to be developed to address the wide-ranging spectrum of undifferentiated presentations and the phases of ED care from triage to patient admission. This paper presents a longitudinal patient monitoring system, which aims to provide monitoring and escalation of care, where necessary, of adult patients from triage to admission to hospital in a manner that is feasible in the unique ED environment. Methods An action research approach was taken to designing a longitudinal patient monitoring system appropriate for the ED. While the first draft protocol for post-triage monitoring and escalation was designed by a core research group, six clinical sites were included in iterative cycles of planning, action, reviewing and further planning. Reasons for refining the system at each site were collated and the protocol was adjusted accordingly before commencing the process at the next site. Results The ED Adult Clinical Escalation longitudinal patient monitoring system (ED-ACE) evolved through iterative cycles of design and testing to include: (1) a monitoring chart for adult patients; (2) a standardised approach to the monitoring and reassessment of patients after triage until they are assessed by a clinician; (3) the ISBAR (I=Identify, S=Situation, B=Background, A=Assessment, R=Recommendation) tool for interprofessional communication relating to clinical escalation; (4) a template for prescribing a patientspecific monitoring plan to be used by treating clinicians to guide patient monitoring from the time the patient is assessed until when they leave the ED and (5) a protocol for clinical escalation prompted by single physiological triggers and clinical concern. Conclusions This tool offers a link in the 'Chain of Prevention' between the Manchester Triage System and ward-based early warning scores taking account of the importance of standardisation, while being sufficiently adaptable for the unique working environment and patient population in the ED.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)608-612
Number of pages5
JournalEmergency Medicine Journal
Volume34
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2017
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Coughlan, Eoin ; Geary, Una ; Wakai, Abel ; O'Sullivan, Ronan ; Browne, John ; McAuliffe, Eilish ; Ward, Marie ; McDaid, Fiona ; Deasy, Conor. / An introduction to the Emergency Department Adult Clinical Escalation protocol : ED-ACE. In: Emergency Medicine Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 34, No. 9. pp. 608-612.
@article{9638d4cb442f4cc3a46287f8eff73adc,
title = "An introduction to the Emergency Department Adult Clinical Escalation protocol: ED-ACE",
abstract = "Purpose of the study This study demonstrates how a participatory action research approach was used to address the challenge of the early and effective detection of the deteriorating patient in the ED setting. The approach enabled a systematic approach to patient monitoring and escalation of care to be developed to address the wide-ranging spectrum of undifferentiated presentations and the phases of ED care from triage to patient admission. This paper presents a longitudinal patient monitoring system, which aims to provide monitoring and escalation of care, where necessary, of adult patients from triage to admission to hospital in a manner that is feasible in the unique ED environment. Methods An action research approach was taken to designing a longitudinal patient monitoring system appropriate for the ED. While the first draft protocol for post-triage monitoring and escalation was designed by a core research group, six clinical sites were included in iterative cycles of planning, action, reviewing and further planning. Reasons for refining the system at each site were collated and the protocol was adjusted accordingly before commencing the process at the next site. Results The ED Adult Clinical Escalation longitudinal patient monitoring system (ED-ACE) evolved through iterative cycles of design and testing to include: (1) a monitoring chart for adult patients; (2) a standardised approach to the monitoring and reassessment of patients after triage until they are assessed by a clinician; (3) the ISBAR (I=Identify, S=Situation, B=Background, A=Assessment, R=Recommendation) tool for interprofessional communication relating to clinical escalation; (4) a template for prescribing a patientspecific monitoring plan to be used by treating clinicians to guide patient monitoring from the time the patient is assessed until when they leave the ED and (5) a protocol for clinical escalation prompted by single physiological triggers and clinical concern. Conclusions This tool offers a link in the 'Chain of Prevention' between the Manchester Triage System and ward-based early warning scores taking account of the importance of standardisation, while being sufficiently adaptable for the unique working environment and patient population in the ED.",
author = "Eoin Coughlan and Una Geary and Abel Wakai and Ronan O'Sullivan and John Browne and Eilish McAuliffe and Marie Ward and Fiona McDaid and Conor Deasy",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/emermed-2015-205611",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "608--612",
journal = "Emergency Medicine Journal",
issn = "1472-0205",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
number = "9",

}

Coughlan, E, Geary, U, Wakai, A, O'Sullivan, R, Browne, J, McAuliffe, E, Ward, M, McDaid, F & Deasy, C 2017, 'An introduction to the Emergency Department Adult Clinical Escalation protocol: ED-ACE' Emergency Medicine Journal, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 608-612. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2015-205611

An introduction to the Emergency Department Adult Clinical Escalation protocol : ED-ACE. / Coughlan, Eoin; Geary, Una; Wakai, Abel; O'Sullivan, Ronan; Browne, John; McAuliffe, Eilish; Ward, Marie; McDaid, Fiona; Deasy, Conor.

In: Emergency Medicine Journal, Vol. 34, No. 9, 01.09.2017, p. 608-612.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An introduction to the Emergency Department Adult Clinical Escalation protocol

T2 - ED-ACE

AU - Coughlan, Eoin

AU - Geary, Una

AU - Wakai, Abel

AU - O'Sullivan, Ronan

AU - Browne, John

AU - McAuliffe, Eilish

AU - Ward, Marie

AU - McDaid, Fiona

AU - Deasy, Conor

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Purpose of the study This study demonstrates how a participatory action research approach was used to address the challenge of the early and effective detection of the deteriorating patient in the ED setting. The approach enabled a systematic approach to patient monitoring and escalation of care to be developed to address the wide-ranging spectrum of undifferentiated presentations and the phases of ED care from triage to patient admission. This paper presents a longitudinal patient monitoring system, which aims to provide monitoring and escalation of care, where necessary, of adult patients from triage to admission to hospital in a manner that is feasible in the unique ED environment. Methods An action research approach was taken to designing a longitudinal patient monitoring system appropriate for the ED. While the first draft protocol for post-triage monitoring and escalation was designed by a core research group, six clinical sites were included in iterative cycles of planning, action, reviewing and further planning. Reasons for refining the system at each site were collated and the protocol was adjusted accordingly before commencing the process at the next site. Results The ED Adult Clinical Escalation longitudinal patient monitoring system (ED-ACE) evolved through iterative cycles of design and testing to include: (1) a monitoring chart for adult patients; (2) a standardised approach to the monitoring and reassessment of patients after triage until they are assessed by a clinician; (3) the ISBAR (I=Identify, S=Situation, B=Background, A=Assessment, R=Recommendation) tool for interprofessional communication relating to clinical escalation; (4) a template for prescribing a patientspecific monitoring plan to be used by treating clinicians to guide patient monitoring from the time the patient is assessed until when they leave the ED and (5) a protocol for clinical escalation prompted by single physiological triggers and clinical concern. Conclusions This tool offers a link in the 'Chain of Prevention' between the Manchester Triage System and ward-based early warning scores taking account of the importance of standardisation, while being sufficiently adaptable for the unique working environment and patient population in the ED.

AB - Purpose of the study This study demonstrates how a participatory action research approach was used to address the challenge of the early and effective detection of the deteriorating patient in the ED setting. The approach enabled a systematic approach to patient monitoring and escalation of care to be developed to address the wide-ranging spectrum of undifferentiated presentations and the phases of ED care from triage to patient admission. This paper presents a longitudinal patient monitoring system, which aims to provide monitoring and escalation of care, where necessary, of adult patients from triage to admission to hospital in a manner that is feasible in the unique ED environment. Methods An action research approach was taken to designing a longitudinal patient monitoring system appropriate for the ED. While the first draft protocol for post-triage monitoring and escalation was designed by a core research group, six clinical sites were included in iterative cycles of planning, action, reviewing and further planning. Reasons for refining the system at each site were collated and the protocol was adjusted accordingly before commencing the process at the next site. Results The ED Adult Clinical Escalation longitudinal patient monitoring system (ED-ACE) evolved through iterative cycles of design and testing to include: (1) a monitoring chart for adult patients; (2) a standardised approach to the monitoring and reassessment of patients after triage until they are assessed by a clinician; (3) the ISBAR (I=Identify, S=Situation, B=Background, A=Assessment, R=Recommendation) tool for interprofessional communication relating to clinical escalation; (4) a template for prescribing a patientspecific monitoring plan to be used by treating clinicians to guide patient monitoring from the time the patient is assessed until when they leave the ED and (5) a protocol for clinical escalation prompted by single physiological triggers and clinical concern. Conclusions This tool offers a link in the 'Chain of Prevention' between the Manchester Triage System and ward-based early warning scores taking account of the importance of standardisation, while being sufficiently adaptable for the unique working environment and patient population in the ED.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85001821016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/emermed-2015-205611

DO - 10.1136/emermed-2015-205611

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 608

EP - 612

JO - Emergency Medicine Journal

JF - Emergency Medicine Journal

SN - 1472-0205

IS - 9

ER -