Abstract
The iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification) technique is widely employed in proteomic workflows requiring relative quantification. Here, we review the iTRAQ literature; in particular, we focus on iTRAQ usage in relation to other commonly used quantitative techniques e.g. stable isotope labelling in culture (SILAC), label-free methods and selected reaction monitoring (SRM). As a result, we identify several issues arising with respect to iTRAQ. Perhaps frustratingly, iTRAQ's attractiveness has been undermined by a number of technical and analytical limitations: it may not be truly quantitative, as the changes in abundance reported will generally be underestimated. We discuss weaknesses and strengths of iTRAQ as a methodology for relative quantification in the light of this and other technical issues. We focus on technical developments targeted at iTRAQ accuracy and precision, use of 4-plex over 8-plex reagents and application of iTRAQ to post-translational modification (PTM) workflows. We also discuss iTRAQ in relation to label-free approaches, to which iTRAQ is losing ground. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1011-1027 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry |
| Volume | 404 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Isotopic impurities
- ITRAQ
- Label-free
- Modelling
- MS/MS instrumentation
- PTMs
- Ratio underestimation
- Relative quantification
- Shotgun proteomics
- Statistical validation
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver