Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An insight into iTRAQ: Where do we stand now?

  • Caroline Evans Evans
  • , Josselin Noirel
  • , Saw Yen Ow
  • , Malinda Salim
  • , Ana G. Pereira-Medrano
  • , Narciso Couto
  • , Jagroop Pandhal
  • , Duncan L. Smith
  • , Trong Khoa Pham
  • , Esther Karunakaran
  • , Xin Zou
  • , Catherine A. Biggs
  • , Phillip C. Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification) technique is widely employed in proteomic workflows requiring relative quantification. Here, we review the iTRAQ literature; in particular, we focus on iTRAQ usage in relation to other commonly used quantitative techniques e.g. stable isotope labelling in culture (SILAC), label-free methods and selected reaction monitoring (SRM). As a result, we identify several issues arising with respect to iTRAQ. Perhaps frustratingly, iTRAQ's attractiveness has been undermined by a number of technical and analytical limitations: it may not be truly quantitative, as the changes in abundance reported will generally be underestimated. We discuss weaknesses and strengths of iTRAQ as a methodology for relative quantification in the light of this and other technical issues. We focus on technical developments targeted at iTRAQ accuracy and precision, use of 4-plex over 8-plex reagents and application of iTRAQ to post-translational modification (PTM) workflows. We also discuss iTRAQ in relation to label-free approaches, to which iTRAQ is losing ground. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1011-1027
Number of pages17
JournalAnalytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Volume404
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Isotopic impurities
  • ITRAQ
  • Label-free
  • Modelling
  • MS/MS instrumentation
  • PTMs
  • Ratio underestimation
  • Relative quantification
  • Shotgun proteomics
  • Statistical validation

Cite this