Abstract
Purpose: Without accurate information, personal recovery will remain in the shadow of other clinical measures of the mental health experience, such as severity of symptoms and degree of risk. Methods: This study examined utility of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) to highlight personal recovery preferences and needs, from a service user perspective, within a sub-acute setting in Australia. Results: Fifty-seven QPRs were completed and the results were evaluated against the CHIME framework. The QPR highlighted the interpersonal and intrapersonal factors that support and impede personal recovery. Discussion: The QPR helps service users to identify and build on their own strengths and encourages clinicians to focus on service users’ personal aspirations, rather than predefined treatment goals. Conclusions: No single scale will provide a full picture of someone’s emotional wellbeing. A range of outcome measures should be used to get a more complete picture. The QPR could be standardized as one of the routine outcome measures used in Victorian mental health services.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 179–193 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work (United States) |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Mental health
- QPR
- recovery-oriented practice
- sub-acute
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver