An evaluation of debt agreements in Australia

Vivien Chen, Lucinda O'Brien, Ian Ramsay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In the 20 years since their introduction, debt agreements have become the fastest growing form of personal insolvency in Australia, comprising 41.5 per cent of all personal insolvencies in 2016. Debt agreements were introduced to provide debtors respite from financial stress through arrangements with creditors and to provide a viable alternative to bankruptcy. Law reformers posited that their low cost, and the avoidance of some of the consequences of bankruptcy, were among their key benefits. The article draws on three sources of empirical data to evaluate the debt agreement system and its impact on Australian debtors: statistics published by the Australian Financial Security Authority, a survey of individuals who entered into debt agreements or declared bankruptcy between 2010 and 2015, and interviews with a range of industry stakeholders. The article considers the extent to which debt agreements are achieving their objectives and examines concerns that debt agreements may be causing harm, particularly to vulnerable debtors on low incomes. The authors propose a series of reforms to enhance the efficiency of debt agreements.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-197
Number of pages47
JournalMonash University Law Review
Volume44
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

Chen, V., O'Brien, L., & Ramsay, I. (2018). An evaluation of debt agreements in Australia. Monash University Law Review, 44(1), 151-197.
Chen, Vivien ; O'Brien, Lucinda ; Ramsay, Ian . / An evaluation of debt agreements in Australia. In: Monash University Law Review. 2018 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 151-197.
@article{128b440865fc415983717a84288b49b2,
title = "An evaluation of debt agreements in Australia",
abstract = "In the 20 years since their introduction, debt agreements have become the fastest growing form of personal insolvency in Australia, comprising 41.5 per cent of all personal insolvencies in 2016. Debt agreements were introduced to provide debtors respite from financial stress through arrangements with creditors and to provide a viable alternative to bankruptcy. Law reformers posited that their low cost, and the avoidance of some of the consequences of bankruptcy, were among their key benefits. The article draws on three sources of empirical data to evaluate the debt agreement system and its impact on Australian debtors: statistics published by the Australian Financial Security Authority, a survey of individuals who entered into debt agreements or declared bankruptcy between 2010 and 2015, and interviews with a range of industry stakeholders. The article considers the extent to which debt agreements are achieving their objectives and examines concerns that debt agreements may be causing harm, particularly to vulnerable debtors on low incomes. The authors propose a series of reforms to enhance the efficiency of debt agreements.",
author = "Vivien Chen and Lucinda O'Brien and Ian Ramsay",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "151--197",
journal = "Monash University Law Review",
issn = "0311-3140",
number = "1",

}

Chen, V, O'Brien, L & Ramsay, I 2018, 'An evaluation of debt agreements in Australia' Monash University Law Review, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 151-197.

An evaluation of debt agreements in Australia. / Chen, Vivien; O'Brien, Lucinda; Ramsay, Ian .

In: Monash University Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2018, p. 151-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of debt agreements in Australia

AU - Chen, Vivien

AU - O'Brien, Lucinda

AU - Ramsay, Ian

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In the 20 years since their introduction, debt agreements have become the fastest growing form of personal insolvency in Australia, comprising 41.5 per cent of all personal insolvencies in 2016. Debt agreements were introduced to provide debtors respite from financial stress through arrangements with creditors and to provide a viable alternative to bankruptcy. Law reformers posited that their low cost, and the avoidance of some of the consequences of bankruptcy, were among their key benefits. The article draws on three sources of empirical data to evaluate the debt agreement system and its impact on Australian debtors: statistics published by the Australian Financial Security Authority, a survey of individuals who entered into debt agreements or declared bankruptcy between 2010 and 2015, and interviews with a range of industry stakeholders. The article considers the extent to which debt agreements are achieving their objectives and examines concerns that debt agreements may be causing harm, particularly to vulnerable debtors on low incomes. The authors propose a series of reforms to enhance the efficiency of debt agreements.

AB - In the 20 years since their introduction, debt agreements have become the fastest growing form of personal insolvency in Australia, comprising 41.5 per cent of all personal insolvencies in 2016. Debt agreements were introduced to provide debtors respite from financial stress through arrangements with creditors and to provide a viable alternative to bankruptcy. Law reformers posited that their low cost, and the avoidance of some of the consequences of bankruptcy, were among their key benefits. The article draws on three sources of empirical data to evaluate the debt agreement system and its impact on Australian debtors: statistics published by the Australian Financial Security Authority, a survey of individuals who entered into debt agreements or declared bankruptcy between 2010 and 2015, and interviews with a range of industry stakeholders. The article considers the extent to which debt agreements are achieving their objectives and examines concerns that debt agreements may be causing harm, particularly to vulnerable debtors on low incomes. The authors propose a series of reforms to enhance the efficiency of debt agreements.

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 151

EP - 197

JO - Monash University Law Review

JF - Monash University Law Review

SN - 0311-3140

IS - 1

ER -