An empirical model of the Gaia DR3 selection function

Tristan Cantat-Gaudin, Morgan Fouesneau, Hans Walter Rix, Anthony G.A. Brown, Alfred Castro-Ginard, Zuzanna Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Ronald Drimmel, David W. Hogg, Andrew R. Casey, Shourya Khanna, Semyeong Oh, Adrian M. Price-Whelan, Vasily Belokurov, Andrew K. Saydjari, G. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interpreting and modelling astronomical catalogues requires an understanding of the catalogues’ completeness or selection function: what properties determine an object’s probability of being including in the catalogue? Here we set out to empirically quantify the completeness of the overall catalogue of Gaia’s third data release (DR3). This task is not straightforward because Gaia is the all-sky optical survey with the highest angular resolution to date and no consistent ground truth exists to allow direct comparisons. However, well-characterised deeper imaging enables an empirical assessment of Gaia’s G-band completeness across parts of the sky. On this basis, we devised a simple analytical completeness model of Gaia as a function of the observed G magnitude and position over the sky, which accounts for both the effects of crowding and the complex Gaia scanning law. Our model only depends on a single quantity: the median magnitude M10 in a patch of the sky of catalogued sources with astrometric_matchd_transits 10. We note that M10 reflects elementary completeness decisions in the Gaia pipeline and is computable from the Gaia DR3 catalogue itself and therefore applicable across the whole sky. We calibrated our model using the Dark Energy Camera Plane Survey (DECaPS) and tested its predictions against Hubble Space Telescope observations of globular clusters. We found that our model predicts Gaia’s completeness values to a few per cent (RMS) across the sky. We make the model available as a part of the gaiaunlimited Python package built and maintained by the GaiaUnlimited project.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberA55
Number of pages20
JournalAstronomy & Astrophysics
Volume669
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2023

Keywords

  • Astrometry
  • Catalogs
  • Methods: data analysis
  • Methods: statistical

Cite this