An efficient market? Going public in London, 1891–1911

Sturla Fjesme, Neal Galpin, Lyndon Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There have been claims that British capital was not well deployed in Victorian Britain. There was, allegedly, a lack of support for new and dynamic companies in comparison to the situation in Germany and the US. We find no evidence to support these claims. The London Stock Exchange welcomed young, old, domestic, and foreign firms. It provided funds to firms in old, existing industries as well as patenting firms in ‘new-tech’ industries at similar costs of capital. If investors did show a preference for older and foreign firms, it was because those firms offered investors better long-run performance. In addition, we show some evidence that investors who worked in the same industry and lived close to the firm going public were allotted more shares in high-quality initial public offerings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1008-1027
Number of pages20
JournalEconomic History Review
Volume72
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Cite this