TY - JOUR
T1 - An Economic Model of Gambling Behaviour
T2 - A Two-Stage Approach
AU - Cameron, Lachlan
AU - Ride, Jemimah
AU - Devlin, Nancy
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to acknowledge the Australian Commonwealth Government who provide funding for the PhD of Lachlan Cameron through the Research Training Program Scholarship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Gambling can cause significant harms and these can result in a net negative utility from participation, although lower levels of participation have potential benefits and can yield positive net utility. It is therefore important to understand and distinguish between these two stages of gambling behaviour. Currently, economic models have had limited focus on explaining why someone would gamble despite it yielding a negative utility. Here, we present a two-stage model, motivated by empirical literature and intuitive assumptions, that improves on existing economic models by distinguishing between the likelihood of gambling participation and of gambling that yields a negative utility. The model’s predictions are empirically testable, consistent with existing literature, and add new insights. The model’s ability to distinguish between the two stages helps to inform interventions that aim to reduce the prevalence of gambling-related harm while avoiding the need for restrictive approaches that aim to eliminate gambling altogether.
AB - Gambling can cause significant harms and these can result in a net negative utility from participation, although lower levels of participation have potential benefits and can yield positive net utility. It is therefore important to understand and distinguish between these two stages of gambling behaviour. Currently, economic models have had limited focus on explaining why someone would gamble despite it yielding a negative utility. Here, we present a two-stage model, motivated by empirical literature and intuitive assumptions, that improves on existing economic models by distinguishing between the likelihood of gambling participation and of gambling that yields a negative utility. The model’s predictions are empirically testable, consistent with existing literature, and add new insights. The model’s ability to distinguish between the two stages helps to inform interventions that aim to reduce the prevalence of gambling-related harm while avoiding the need for restrictive approaches that aim to eliminate gambling altogether.
KW - Addiction
KW - Cognitive bias
KW - Decision making
KW - Gambling participation
KW - Gambling-related harm
KW - Intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134647714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10899-022-10146-2
DO - 10.1007/s10899-022-10146-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 35867267
AN - SCOPUS:85134647714
SN - 1573-3602
VL - 40
SP - 65
EP - 81
JO - Journal of Gambling Studies
JF - Journal of Gambling Studies
IS - 1
ER -