An assessment of the utility and functionality of wearable head impact sensors in Australian Football

Andrew S. McIntosh, Catherine Willmott, Declan A. Patton, Biswadev Mitra, James H. Brennan, Bleydy Dimech-Betancourt, Teresa S. Howard, Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the utility and functionality of the X-Patch® as a measurement tool to study head impact exposure in Australian Football. Accuracy, precision, reliability and validity were examined. Designs: Laboratory tests and prospective observational study. Methods: Laboratory tests on X-Patch® were undertaken using an instrumented Hybrid III head and neck and linear impactor. Differences between X-Patch® and reference data were analysed. Australian Football players wore the X-Patch® devices and games were video-recorded. Video recordings were analysed qualitatively for head impact events and these were correlated with X-Patch® head acceleration events. Wearability of the X-Patch® was assessed using the Comfort Rating Scale for Wearable Computers. Results: Laboratory head impacts, performed at multiple impact sites and velocities, identified significant correlations between headform-measured and device-measured kinematic parameters (p < 0.05 for all). On average, the X-Patch®-recorded peak linear acceleration (PLA) was 17% greater than the reference PLA, 28% less for peak rotational acceleration (PRA) and 101% greater for the Head Injury Criterion (HIC). For video analysis, 118 head acceleration events (HAE) were included with PLA ≥30 g across 53 players. Video recordings of X-Patch®-measured HAEs (PLA ≥30 g) determined that 31.4% were direct head impacts, 9.3% were indirect impacts, 44.1% were unknown or unclear and 15.3% were neither direct nor indirect head impacts. The X-Patch® system was deemed wearable by 95–100% of respondents. Conclusions: This study reinforces evidence that use of the current X-Patch® devices should be limited to research only and in conjunction with video analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)784-789
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume22
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Australian Football
  • Concussion
  • Head impact biomechanics
  • Sports injury
  • Wearable sensors

Cite this

@article{6831869df8be472c99fd25bbee0ee239,
title = "An assessment of the utility and functionality of wearable head impact sensors in Australian Football",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess the utility and functionality of the X-Patch{\circledR} as a measurement tool to study head impact exposure in Australian Football. Accuracy, precision, reliability and validity were examined. Designs: Laboratory tests and prospective observational study. Methods: Laboratory tests on X-Patch{\circledR} were undertaken using an instrumented Hybrid III head and neck and linear impactor. Differences between X-Patch{\circledR} and reference data were analysed. Australian Football players wore the X-Patch{\circledR} devices and games were video-recorded. Video recordings were analysed qualitatively for head impact events and these were correlated with X-Patch{\circledR} head acceleration events. Wearability of the X-Patch{\circledR} was assessed using the Comfort Rating Scale for Wearable Computers. Results: Laboratory head impacts, performed at multiple impact sites and velocities, identified significant correlations between headform-measured and device-measured kinematic parameters (p < 0.05 for all). On average, the X-Patch{\circledR}-recorded peak linear acceleration (PLA) was 17{\%} greater than the reference PLA, 28{\%} less for peak rotational acceleration (PRA) and 101{\%} greater for the Head Injury Criterion (HIC). For video analysis, 118 head acceleration events (HAE) were included with PLA ≥30 g across 53 players. Video recordings of X-Patch{\circledR}-measured HAEs (PLA ≥30 g) determined that 31.4{\%} were direct head impacts, 9.3{\%} were indirect impacts, 44.1{\%} were unknown or unclear and 15.3{\%} were neither direct nor indirect head impacts. The X-Patch{\circledR} system was deemed wearable by 95–100{\%} of respondents. Conclusions: This study reinforces evidence that use of the current X-Patch{\circledR} devices should be limited to research only and in conjunction with video analysis.",
keywords = "Australian Football, Concussion, Head impact biomechanics, Sports injury, Wearable sensors",
author = "McIntosh, {Andrew S.} and Catherine Willmott and Patton, {Declan A.} and Biswadev Mitra and Brennan, {James H.} and Bleydy Dimech-Betancourt and Howard, {Teresa S.} and Rosenfeld, {Jeffrey V.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2019.02.004",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "784--789",
journal = "Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

An assessment of the utility and functionality of wearable head impact sensors in Australian Football. / McIntosh, Andrew S.; Willmott, Catherine; Patton, Declan A.; Mitra, Biswadev; Brennan, James H.; Dimech-Betancourt, Bleydy; Howard, Teresa S.; Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V.

In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol. 22, No. 7, 01.07.2019, p. 784-789.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of the utility and functionality of wearable head impact sensors in Australian Football

AU - McIntosh, Andrew S.

AU - Willmott, Catherine

AU - Patton, Declan A.

AU - Mitra, Biswadev

AU - Brennan, James H.

AU - Dimech-Betancourt, Bleydy

AU - Howard, Teresa S.

AU - Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Objectives: To assess the utility and functionality of the X-Patch® as a measurement tool to study head impact exposure in Australian Football. Accuracy, precision, reliability and validity were examined. Designs: Laboratory tests and prospective observational study. Methods: Laboratory tests on X-Patch® were undertaken using an instrumented Hybrid III head and neck and linear impactor. Differences between X-Patch® and reference data were analysed. Australian Football players wore the X-Patch® devices and games were video-recorded. Video recordings were analysed qualitatively for head impact events and these were correlated with X-Patch® head acceleration events. Wearability of the X-Patch® was assessed using the Comfort Rating Scale for Wearable Computers. Results: Laboratory head impacts, performed at multiple impact sites and velocities, identified significant correlations between headform-measured and device-measured kinematic parameters (p < 0.05 for all). On average, the X-Patch®-recorded peak linear acceleration (PLA) was 17% greater than the reference PLA, 28% less for peak rotational acceleration (PRA) and 101% greater for the Head Injury Criterion (HIC). For video analysis, 118 head acceleration events (HAE) were included with PLA ≥30 g across 53 players. Video recordings of X-Patch®-measured HAEs (PLA ≥30 g) determined that 31.4% were direct head impacts, 9.3% were indirect impacts, 44.1% were unknown or unclear and 15.3% were neither direct nor indirect head impacts. The X-Patch® system was deemed wearable by 95–100% of respondents. Conclusions: This study reinforces evidence that use of the current X-Patch® devices should be limited to research only and in conjunction with video analysis.

AB - Objectives: To assess the utility and functionality of the X-Patch® as a measurement tool to study head impact exposure in Australian Football. Accuracy, precision, reliability and validity were examined. Designs: Laboratory tests and prospective observational study. Methods: Laboratory tests on X-Patch® were undertaken using an instrumented Hybrid III head and neck and linear impactor. Differences between X-Patch® and reference data were analysed. Australian Football players wore the X-Patch® devices and games were video-recorded. Video recordings were analysed qualitatively for head impact events and these were correlated with X-Patch® head acceleration events. Wearability of the X-Patch® was assessed using the Comfort Rating Scale for Wearable Computers. Results: Laboratory head impacts, performed at multiple impact sites and velocities, identified significant correlations between headform-measured and device-measured kinematic parameters (p < 0.05 for all). On average, the X-Patch®-recorded peak linear acceleration (PLA) was 17% greater than the reference PLA, 28% less for peak rotational acceleration (PRA) and 101% greater for the Head Injury Criterion (HIC). For video analysis, 118 head acceleration events (HAE) were included with PLA ≥30 g across 53 players. Video recordings of X-Patch®-measured HAEs (PLA ≥30 g) determined that 31.4% were direct head impacts, 9.3% were indirect impacts, 44.1% were unknown or unclear and 15.3% were neither direct nor indirect head impacts. The X-Patch® system was deemed wearable by 95–100% of respondents. Conclusions: This study reinforces evidence that use of the current X-Patch® devices should be limited to research only and in conjunction with video analysis.

KW - Australian Football

KW - Concussion

KW - Head impact biomechanics

KW - Sports injury

KW - Wearable sensors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064207906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.02.004

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 784

EP - 789

JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 7

ER -