An assessment of array types and processing algorithms for microtremor observations, via the COSMOS Blind Trials

Michael Asten, Alan Yong, Sebastiano Foti, Koichi Hayashi, Antony Martin, William J Stephenson, John F Cassidy, Jacie S Coleman

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractOther

Abstract

The blind trial studies conducted for the 2006 3rd International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology (Grenoble, France) and the 2015 Inter-comparison of methods for site PArameter and veloCIty proFIle charaCterization (InterPACIFIC) Workshop (Turin, Italy) evaluated the utility of microtremor array methods for characterizing seismic site conditions. These studies used a multiplicity of arrays but left an open question as to whether (and under what) conditions might sparse (low-cost) arrays be technically sufficient for the task.
In this study, the Consortium of Organizations for Strong Motion Observation Systems (COSMOS) blind trials used microtremor array data from four sites with geology ranging from deep alluvial valleys to an alpine valley. Data were incrementally released to approximately a dozen analysts in four phases: (1) 2-station linear arrays; (2) sparse triangular arrays; (3) complex nested triangular or circular arrays; (4) all available geological control including drill-hole data. While data from one site consisted of recordings from 3-component sensors, the other three sites consisted of data from vertical-component sensors only. The sites covered a range of noise source distributions, ranging from one site with a highly directional microtremor wave field, to others with distributed or omni-directional wave fields.

Here, we review the results based on the different processing algorithms (e.g., beam-forming, spatial autocorrelation, seismic interferometry) as applied by the analysts to the incrementally released data, and then compare the effectiveness between the differing wave-field distributions. The results of the study will aid in building an evidence-based consensus on preferred cost-effective arrays and processing methodology for future site-effect studies.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

Asten, M., Yong, A., Foti, S., Hayashi, K., Martin, A., Stephenson, W. J., ... Coleman, J. S. (2018). An assessment of array types and processing algorithms for microtremor observations, via the COSMOS Blind Trials.
Asten, Michael ; Yong, Alan ; Foti, Sebastiano ; Hayashi, Koichi ; Martin, Antony ; Stephenson, William J ; Cassidy, John F ; Coleman, Jacie S. / An assessment of array types and processing algorithms for microtremor observations, via the COSMOS Blind Trials. 1 p.
@conference{23ba1f0bacdb4caa8cb6df5a4b319c71,
title = "An assessment of array types and processing algorithms for microtremor observations, via the COSMOS Blind Trials",
abstract = "The blind trial studies conducted for the 2006 3rd International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology (Grenoble, France) and the 2015 Inter-comparison of methods for site PArameter and veloCIty proFIle charaCterization (InterPACIFIC) Workshop (Turin, Italy) evaluated the utility of microtremor array methods for characterizing seismic site conditions. These studies used a multiplicity of arrays but left an open question as to whether (and under what) conditions might sparse (low-cost) arrays be technically sufficient for the task.In this study, the Consortium of Organizations for Strong Motion Observation Systems (COSMOS) blind trials used microtremor array data from four sites with geology ranging from deep alluvial valleys to an alpine valley. Data were incrementally released to approximately a dozen analysts in four phases: (1) 2-station linear arrays; (2) sparse triangular arrays; (3) complex nested triangular or circular arrays; (4) all available geological control including drill-hole data. While data from one site consisted of recordings from 3-component sensors, the other three sites consisted of data from vertical-component sensors only. The sites covered a range of noise source distributions, ranging from one site with a highly directional microtremor wave field, to others with distributed or omni-directional wave fields.Here, we review the results based on the different processing algorithms (e.g., beam-forming, spatial autocorrelation, seismic interferometry) as applied by the analysts to the incrementally released data, and then compare the effectiveness between the differing wave-field distributions. The results of the study will aid in building an evidence-based consensus on preferred cost-effective arrays and processing methodology for future site-effect studies.",
author = "Michael Asten and Alan Yong and Sebastiano Foti and Koichi Hayashi and Antony Martin and Stephenson, {William J} and Cassidy, {John F} and Coleman, {Jacie S}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",

}

Asten, M, Yong, A, Foti, S, Hayashi, K, Martin, A, Stephenson, WJ, Cassidy, JF & Coleman, JS 2018, 'An assessment of array types and processing algorithms for microtremor observations, via the COSMOS Blind Trials'.

An assessment of array types and processing algorithms for microtremor observations, via the COSMOS Blind Trials. / Asten, Michael; Yong, Alan; Foti, Sebastiano; Hayashi, Koichi; Martin, Antony; Stephenson, William J; Cassidy, John F; Coleman, Jacie S.

2018.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractOther

TY - CONF

T1 - An assessment of array types and processing algorithms for microtremor observations, via the COSMOS Blind Trials

AU - Asten, Michael

AU - Yong, Alan

AU - Foti, Sebastiano

AU - Hayashi, Koichi

AU - Martin, Antony

AU - Stephenson, William J

AU - Cassidy, John F

AU - Coleman, Jacie S

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The blind trial studies conducted for the 2006 3rd International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology (Grenoble, France) and the 2015 Inter-comparison of methods for site PArameter and veloCIty proFIle charaCterization (InterPACIFIC) Workshop (Turin, Italy) evaluated the utility of microtremor array methods for characterizing seismic site conditions. These studies used a multiplicity of arrays but left an open question as to whether (and under what) conditions might sparse (low-cost) arrays be technically sufficient for the task.In this study, the Consortium of Organizations for Strong Motion Observation Systems (COSMOS) blind trials used microtremor array data from four sites with geology ranging from deep alluvial valleys to an alpine valley. Data were incrementally released to approximately a dozen analysts in four phases: (1) 2-station linear arrays; (2) sparse triangular arrays; (3) complex nested triangular or circular arrays; (4) all available geological control including drill-hole data. While data from one site consisted of recordings from 3-component sensors, the other three sites consisted of data from vertical-component sensors only. The sites covered a range of noise source distributions, ranging from one site with a highly directional microtremor wave field, to others with distributed or omni-directional wave fields.Here, we review the results based on the different processing algorithms (e.g., beam-forming, spatial autocorrelation, seismic interferometry) as applied by the analysts to the incrementally released data, and then compare the effectiveness between the differing wave-field distributions. The results of the study will aid in building an evidence-based consensus on preferred cost-effective arrays and processing methodology for future site-effect studies.

AB - The blind trial studies conducted for the 2006 3rd International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology (Grenoble, France) and the 2015 Inter-comparison of methods for site PArameter and veloCIty proFIle charaCterization (InterPACIFIC) Workshop (Turin, Italy) evaluated the utility of microtremor array methods for characterizing seismic site conditions. These studies used a multiplicity of arrays but left an open question as to whether (and under what) conditions might sparse (low-cost) arrays be technically sufficient for the task.In this study, the Consortium of Organizations for Strong Motion Observation Systems (COSMOS) blind trials used microtremor array data from four sites with geology ranging from deep alluvial valleys to an alpine valley. Data were incrementally released to approximately a dozen analysts in four phases: (1) 2-station linear arrays; (2) sparse triangular arrays; (3) complex nested triangular or circular arrays; (4) all available geological control including drill-hole data. While data from one site consisted of recordings from 3-component sensors, the other three sites consisted of data from vertical-component sensors only. The sites covered a range of noise source distributions, ranging from one site with a highly directional microtremor wave field, to others with distributed or omni-directional wave fields.Here, we review the results based on the different processing algorithms (e.g., beam-forming, spatial autocorrelation, seismic interferometry) as applied by the analysts to the incrementally released data, and then compare the effectiveness between the differing wave-field distributions. The results of the study will aid in building an evidence-based consensus on preferred cost-effective arrays and processing methodology for future site-effect studies.

M3 - Abstract

ER -