TY - JOUR
T1 - Alternative strategies for exercise critical power estimation in patients with COPD
AU - Malaguti, Carla
AU - Nery, Luiz E.
AU - Corso, Simone Dal
AU - De Fuccio, Marcelo Bicalho
AU - Lerario, Maria Cristina
AU - Cendon, Sonia
AU - Neder, J. Alberto
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This work was partially supported by research grants from Coordenadoria de Aperfeic¸ oamento do Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brazil. JA Neder is an established investigator of the CNPq (level II).
PY - 2006/1
Y1 - 2006/1
N2 - Exercise critical power (CP) has been shown to represent the highest sustainable work rate (WR) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Parameter estimation, however, depends on 4 high-intensity tests performed, on different days, to the limit of tolerance (Tlim. In order to establish a milder protocol that would be more suitable for disabled patients, we contrasted CP derived from 4, 3 and 2 tests (CP4, CP3 and CP2) in 8 males with moderate COPD. In addition, CP was calculated from 2 single-day tests performed on an inverse sequence (CP2AB and CP2BA): CP values within 5 W from CP4 were assumed as "clinically-acceptable"estimates. We found that [CP4-CP3] and [CP4-CP2] differences were within 5 W in 8 and 6 patients, respectively (95% confidence interval of the differences=-1.3 to 3.5 W and -11.5 to 6.5 W). There was a systematic decline on Tlim when an exercise bout was performed after a previous test on the same day (P<0.05). Consequently, substantial differences were found between CP4 and any of the CP estimates obtained from single-day tests. In conclusion, clinically-acceptable estimates of CP can be obtained by using 3 or, in most circumstances, 2 constant WR tests in patients with moderate COPD-provided that they are not performed on the same day.
AB - Exercise critical power (CP) has been shown to represent the highest sustainable work rate (WR) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Parameter estimation, however, depends on 4 high-intensity tests performed, on different days, to the limit of tolerance (Tlim. In order to establish a milder protocol that would be more suitable for disabled patients, we contrasted CP derived from 4, 3 and 2 tests (CP4, CP3 and CP2) in 8 males with moderate COPD. In addition, CP was calculated from 2 single-day tests performed on an inverse sequence (CP2AB and CP2BA): CP values within 5 W from CP4 were assumed as "clinically-acceptable"estimates. We found that [CP4-CP3] and [CP4-CP2] differences were within 5 W in 8 and 6 patients, respectively (95% confidence interval of the differences=-1.3 to 3.5 W and -11.5 to 6.5 W). There was a systematic decline on Tlim when an exercise bout was performed after a previous test on the same day (P<0.05). Consequently, substantial differences were found between CP4 and any of the CP estimates obtained from single-day tests. In conclusion, clinically-acceptable estimates of CP can be obtained by using 3 or, in most circumstances, 2 constant WR tests in patients with moderate COPD-provided that they are not performed on the same day.
KW - COPD
KW - Critical power
KW - Exercise capacity
KW - Oxygen consumption
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29544440812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00421-005-0064-x
DO - 10.1007/s00421-005-0064-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 16249920
AN - SCOPUS:29544440812
SN - 1439-6319
VL - 96
SP - 59
EP - 65
JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 1
ER -