Alternative Conceptions: Turning Adversity into Advantage

Annalize Ferreira, Miriam Lemmer, Richard Gunstone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

While a vast body of research has identified difficulties in students’ understanding about forces and acceleration and their related alternative conceptions, far less research suggests ways to use students’ alternative conceptions to enhance conceptual understanding of a specific fundamental concept. This study focused on distinguishing between students’ conceptual understanding of the Newtonian concept of gravitational acceleration being the same for all objects and students’ alternative conception that heavy objects fall faster. A multiple choice questionnaire was distributed to first year physics students for three consecutive years at a university in South Africa. The results indicate that changing the direction of motion and the physics quantity asked in paired questions revealed practically significant inconsistencies in students’ reasoning and conceptions. This research contributes to the body of knowledge in proposing how the alternative conception of mass-related gravitational acceleration can be used in instruction to enhance conceptual understanding of the force–mass–acceleration relationship. Understanding of this relationship not only promotes conceptual understanding of the basic Newtonian concepts of the laws of motion which forms the critical foundation on which more advanced physics courses are built, but also contributes towards students’ perception of physics as a set of coherent ideas applicable in all contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalResearch in Science Education
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 4 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Alternative conceptions
  • Conceptual understanding
  • Direction of motion
  • Force and acceleration
  • Threshold concepts

Cite this

@article{a8d687b6c95647bcafc1c27cc91ddfaa,
title = "Alternative Conceptions: Turning Adversity into Advantage",
abstract = "While a vast body of research has identified difficulties in students’ understanding about forces and acceleration and their related alternative conceptions, far less research suggests ways to use students’ alternative conceptions to enhance conceptual understanding of a specific fundamental concept. This study focused on distinguishing between students’ conceptual understanding of the Newtonian concept of gravitational acceleration being the same for all objects and students’ alternative conception that heavy objects fall faster. A multiple choice questionnaire was distributed to first year physics students for three consecutive years at a university in South Africa. The results indicate that changing the direction of motion and the physics quantity asked in paired questions revealed practically significant inconsistencies in students’ reasoning and conceptions. This research contributes to the body of knowledge in proposing how the alternative conception of mass-related gravitational acceleration can be used in instruction to enhance conceptual understanding of the force–mass–acceleration relationship. Understanding of this relationship not only promotes conceptual understanding of the basic Newtonian concepts of the laws of motion which forms the critical foundation on which more advanced physics courses are built, but also contributes towards students’ perception of physics as a set of coherent ideas applicable in all contexts.",
keywords = "Alternative conceptions, Conceptual understanding, Direction of motion, Force and acceleration, Threshold concepts",
author = "Annalize Ferreira and Miriam Lemmer and Richard Gunstone",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11165-017-9638-y",
language = "English",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "Research in Science Education",
issn = "0157-244X",
publisher = "Springer-Praxis",

}

Alternative Conceptions : Turning Adversity into Advantage. / Ferreira, Annalize; Lemmer, Miriam; Gunstone, Richard.

In: Research in Science Education, 04.08.2017, p. 1-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternative Conceptions

T2 - Turning Adversity into Advantage

AU - Ferreira, Annalize

AU - Lemmer, Miriam

AU - Gunstone, Richard

PY - 2017/8/4

Y1 - 2017/8/4

N2 - While a vast body of research has identified difficulties in students’ understanding about forces and acceleration and their related alternative conceptions, far less research suggests ways to use students’ alternative conceptions to enhance conceptual understanding of a specific fundamental concept. This study focused on distinguishing between students’ conceptual understanding of the Newtonian concept of gravitational acceleration being the same for all objects and students’ alternative conception that heavy objects fall faster. A multiple choice questionnaire was distributed to first year physics students for three consecutive years at a university in South Africa. The results indicate that changing the direction of motion and the physics quantity asked in paired questions revealed practically significant inconsistencies in students’ reasoning and conceptions. This research contributes to the body of knowledge in proposing how the alternative conception of mass-related gravitational acceleration can be used in instruction to enhance conceptual understanding of the force–mass–acceleration relationship. Understanding of this relationship not only promotes conceptual understanding of the basic Newtonian concepts of the laws of motion which forms the critical foundation on which more advanced physics courses are built, but also contributes towards students’ perception of physics as a set of coherent ideas applicable in all contexts.

AB - While a vast body of research has identified difficulties in students’ understanding about forces and acceleration and their related alternative conceptions, far less research suggests ways to use students’ alternative conceptions to enhance conceptual understanding of a specific fundamental concept. This study focused on distinguishing between students’ conceptual understanding of the Newtonian concept of gravitational acceleration being the same for all objects and students’ alternative conception that heavy objects fall faster. A multiple choice questionnaire was distributed to first year physics students for three consecutive years at a university in South Africa. The results indicate that changing the direction of motion and the physics quantity asked in paired questions revealed practically significant inconsistencies in students’ reasoning and conceptions. This research contributes to the body of knowledge in proposing how the alternative conception of mass-related gravitational acceleration can be used in instruction to enhance conceptual understanding of the force–mass–acceleration relationship. Understanding of this relationship not only promotes conceptual understanding of the basic Newtonian concepts of the laws of motion which forms the critical foundation on which more advanced physics courses are built, but also contributes towards students’ perception of physics as a set of coherent ideas applicable in all contexts.

KW - Alternative conceptions

KW - Conceptual understanding

KW - Direction of motion

KW - Force and acceleration

KW - Threshold concepts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026846337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11165-017-9638-y

DO - 10.1007/s11165-017-9638-y

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - Research in Science Education

JF - Research in Science Education

SN - 0157-244X

ER -