Aligning ambulance dispatch priority to patient acuity

A methodology

Emily Andrew, Colin Jones, Michael Stephenson, Tony Walker, Stephen Bernard, Peter Cameron, Karen Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: In Victoria, Australia, Emergency Medical Service (EMS) demand has increased almost 5% per annum over the past 5 years. This may adversely affect response times to time-critical patients. Additionally, >55% of cases have received Code 1 (lights/sirens) responses. Primary telephone triage occurs using the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS); however, MPDS is reported to be highly sensitive, with common over-triage. The present study describes the methodology applied to better align the response allocated to MPDS determinant codes with patient acuity. Methods: Data between October 2013 and August 2014 were extracted from the Ambulance Victoria data warehouse. The decision to allocate MPDS determinant codes to a lower response priority and/or secondary triage was based on epidemiological profiling and, in some cases, expert panel review. Results: The review identified 105 MPDS codes receiving a Code 1 response as suitable for a Code 2 (urgent) response, and 221 Code 1 or 2 codes as suitable for secondary triage. Data analysis estimated a reduction in Code 1 responses by 28%, and an increase in the secondary triage caseload by 120%. Modelling also predicted a 2.6 percentage point improvement in the proportion of Code 1 cases attended within 15 min. Conclusion: Analysis of a large EMS dataset supported changes to the EMS response priority for a number of MPDS determinant codes. Such changes should improve the alignment between EMS response and patient acuity, and improve response times to time-critical patients. Other EMS with electronic data could consider testing this methodology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-410
Number of pages6
JournalEMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Keywords

  • emergency medical dispatch
  • emergency medical services
  • methods
  • patient acuity
  • triage

Cite this

@article{6aaaecb9a3104937ab614f59a66fb62b,
title = "Aligning ambulance dispatch priority to patient acuity: A methodology",
abstract = "Objective: In Victoria, Australia, Emergency Medical Service (EMS) demand has increased almost 5{\%} per annum over the past 5 years. This may adversely affect response times to time-critical patients. Additionally, >55{\%} of cases have received Code 1 (lights/sirens) responses. Primary telephone triage occurs using the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS); however, MPDS is reported to be highly sensitive, with common over-triage. The present study describes the methodology applied to better align the response allocated to MPDS determinant codes with patient acuity. Methods: Data between October 2013 and August 2014 were extracted from the Ambulance Victoria data warehouse. The decision to allocate MPDS determinant codes to a lower response priority and/or secondary triage was based on epidemiological profiling and, in some cases, expert panel review. Results: The review identified 105 MPDS codes receiving a Code 1 response as suitable for a Code 2 (urgent) response, and 221 Code 1 or 2 codes as suitable for secondary triage. Data analysis estimated a reduction in Code 1 responses by 28{\%}, and an increase in the secondary triage caseload by 120{\%}. Modelling also predicted a 2.6 percentage point improvement in the proportion of Code 1 cases attended within 15 min. Conclusion: Analysis of a large EMS dataset supported changes to the EMS response priority for a number of MPDS determinant codes. Such changes should improve the alignment between EMS response and patient acuity, and improve response times to time-critical patients. Other EMS with electronic data could consider testing this methodology.",
keywords = "emergency medical dispatch, emergency medical services, methods, patient acuity, triage",
author = "Emily Andrew and Colin Jones and Michael Stephenson and Tony Walker and Stephen Bernard and Peter Cameron and Karen Smith",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/1742-6723.13181",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "405--410",
journal = "EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia",
issn = "1742-6731",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Aligning ambulance dispatch priority to patient acuity : A methodology. / Andrew, Emily; Jones, Colin; Stephenson, Michael; Walker, Tony; Bernard, Stephen; Cameron, Peter; Smith, Karen.

In: EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, Vol. 31, No. 3, 06.2019, p. 405-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning ambulance dispatch priority to patient acuity

T2 - A methodology

AU - Andrew, Emily

AU - Jones, Colin

AU - Stephenson, Michael

AU - Walker, Tony

AU - Bernard, Stephen

AU - Cameron, Peter

AU - Smith, Karen

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Objective: In Victoria, Australia, Emergency Medical Service (EMS) demand has increased almost 5% per annum over the past 5 years. This may adversely affect response times to time-critical patients. Additionally, >55% of cases have received Code 1 (lights/sirens) responses. Primary telephone triage occurs using the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS); however, MPDS is reported to be highly sensitive, with common over-triage. The present study describes the methodology applied to better align the response allocated to MPDS determinant codes with patient acuity. Methods: Data between October 2013 and August 2014 were extracted from the Ambulance Victoria data warehouse. The decision to allocate MPDS determinant codes to a lower response priority and/or secondary triage was based on epidemiological profiling and, in some cases, expert panel review. Results: The review identified 105 MPDS codes receiving a Code 1 response as suitable for a Code 2 (urgent) response, and 221 Code 1 or 2 codes as suitable for secondary triage. Data analysis estimated a reduction in Code 1 responses by 28%, and an increase in the secondary triage caseload by 120%. Modelling also predicted a 2.6 percentage point improvement in the proportion of Code 1 cases attended within 15 min. Conclusion: Analysis of a large EMS dataset supported changes to the EMS response priority for a number of MPDS determinant codes. Such changes should improve the alignment between EMS response and patient acuity, and improve response times to time-critical patients. Other EMS with electronic data could consider testing this methodology.

AB - Objective: In Victoria, Australia, Emergency Medical Service (EMS) demand has increased almost 5% per annum over the past 5 years. This may adversely affect response times to time-critical patients. Additionally, >55% of cases have received Code 1 (lights/sirens) responses. Primary telephone triage occurs using the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS); however, MPDS is reported to be highly sensitive, with common over-triage. The present study describes the methodology applied to better align the response allocated to MPDS determinant codes with patient acuity. Methods: Data between October 2013 and August 2014 were extracted from the Ambulance Victoria data warehouse. The decision to allocate MPDS determinant codes to a lower response priority and/or secondary triage was based on epidemiological profiling and, in some cases, expert panel review. Results: The review identified 105 MPDS codes receiving a Code 1 response as suitable for a Code 2 (urgent) response, and 221 Code 1 or 2 codes as suitable for secondary triage. Data analysis estimated a reduction in Code 1 responses by 28%, and an increase in the secondary triage caseload by 120%. Modelling also predicted a 2.6 percentage point improvement in the proportion of Code 1 cases attended within 15 min. Conclusion: Analysis of a large EMS dataset supported changes to the EMS response priority for a number of MPDS determinant codes. Such changes should improve the alignment between EMS response and patient acuity, and improve response times to time-critical patients. Other EMS with electronic data could consider testing this methodology.

KW - emergency medical dispatch

KW - emergency medical services

KW - methods

KW - patient acuity

KW - triage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053493528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1742-6723.13181

DO - 10.1111/1742-6723.13181

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 405

EP - 410

JO - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

JF - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

SN - 1742-6731

IS - 3

ER -